Attorney on call · 24/7 · Risk-free consultation
212 300 5196
SECTION B · PROCEDURAL STAGE · B10

Asking for more time, properly.

The rule permits temporary delay and limited extensions for good cause, with written notice of the reason. Institutions grant far more of these than respondents request - because most respondents never ask, and the ones who do ask verbally leave no record.
ASK IN WRITING, ALWAYS
A phone call to a coordinator that produces an extension is worth having and worthless later. The same request in an email is both.
WHICH RULES GOVERN YOUR CASE The 2020 Title IX regulations. The 2024 rewrite was vacated and does not apply.
RULE TRACKER →
THE BRIEFING · EXTENSIONS AND GOOD CAUSE

Time is the cheapest advantage available to a respondent, and it is the one most consistently left on the table.

What the rule allows.

A grievance process must have reasonably prompt timeframes, and it may include temporary delays or limited extensions of time for good cause, with written notice to both parties of the delay and the reasons for it. The rule gives examples: concurrent law enforcement activity, the unavailability of a party, witness or advisor, and the need for language assistance or disability accommodation.

Why asking matters more than the answer.

A written request creates three things regardless of outcome. If granted, the additional time is real. If refused, the refusal is documented with a date and a stated reason, which becomes procedural material where the compression affected preparation. And either way the file shows a respondent engaging with the process properly rather than delaying it.

The two windows worth extending.

The evidence review period and the report review period. Both are ten-day minimums, both produce the most leveraged documents in the process, and both are frequently squeezed by a production that arrived late or ran to hundreds of pages. An extension request citing the volume of the production, filed within a day of receiving it, is difficult to refuse.

What makes a request fail.

Vagueness and timing. A general assertion that more time is needed, made close to a deadline, reads as avoidance. A specific request identifying the fact that makes the current period insufficient, proposing a defined number of days, offering to continue with other steps meanwhile, and filed early, reads as diligence - and is granted at a materially higher rate.

Why you should call us.

If you are scrolling through search results trying to find someone to defend you, your search is over. You have found Spodek Law Group P.C. - and we are not your average defense firm. We know a thing or two about defending the accused in campus cases - and in the criminal courts that run alongside them. Over 50 years of combined experience, some of the toughest cases in the country, and we have come out on top. We have seen it all, and we empathise with you. We understand how frightening this is, and we have a legal team who can fight and win.

Unlike other attorneys who care about their reputation with the administrators and the prosecutors, our only goal is getting you the best outcome. We owe loyalty to only you. Our lawyers listen to you, your fears, and your goals. We care about your story, and that is where the work begins - by understanding and listening to you.

On billing, we are transparent about our fees, and there are no surprises. Choosing a lawyer is a big deal and cost is a real issue, so we are committed to being your champion irrespective of your ability to pay. Our firm has a simple belief: lawyers should only take on clients whom they can truly help. Many firms are mills that take every case through the door. We do not.

Working with us starts with a risk-free consultation, in person or over the phone. You can ask us anything, for as long as it takes, and we encourage you to ask the tough questions. We are available 24/7, we practise coast to coast, and every client has direct access to a partner. Call 212 300 5196 - an attorney answers.

GENERAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE. YOUR SCHOOL’S POLICY AND YOUR FACTS DECIDE EVERYTHING - AND THE CONSULTATION IS FREE. Skip reading - just call →
WHAT COUNTS AS GOOD CAUSE
Six grounds.
Named in the rule or accepted in practice. Each needs documenting rather than asserting.
CAUSE 01
Concurrent law enforcement activity
Named in the rule. The strongest ground available.
EXPRESS
CAUSE 02
Party or witness unavailability
Illness, travel, or an unavoidable academic commitment.
ACCEPTED
CAUSE 03
Advisor unavailability
Including a newly engaged advisor needing preparation time.
COMMON
CAUSE 04
Accommodation needs
Disability accommodations or language assistance. Named in the rule.
EXPRESS
CAUSE 05
Volume of evidence
A late or very large production genuinely requires more than ten days.
REASONABLE
CAUSE 06
Exam periods and breaks
Not a rule ground, but institutions routinely accommodate it.
ASK ANYWAY
The ten-day windows are floors. The evidence review and report review periods are minimums of ten days, not targets. An extension request with a stated reason, made early, is frequently granted - and those two documents are the most consequential filings in the process.
WHAT THE REQUEST CONTAINS
Four elements.
Specific requests are granted. General ones are refused.
01The provision
Quote the policy’s good-cause language and the regulation permitting delay.
02The reason, documented
Not “I need more time” but the fact that makes the current period insufficient.
03A defined period
A specific number of days, with a date. Open-ended requests are refused.
04What continues meanwhile
Offer to proceed with other steps. It reads as good faith rather than delay.
KEEP READING · THE TITLE IX SET
Where this page hands you off.
No page on this site is a dead end. These are the next questions people ask after this one, in the order they usually ask them.
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
FIG. - THE PRINCIPAL
THE LAWYER THE PRESS CALLS
You've seen the defense on Netflix. This is the firm behind it.

Todd A. Spodek is a second-generation trial lawyer whose defense of Anna Delvey became Netflix's Inventing Anna. He appears on Fox News and CNN as a legal analyst, authored "My Advice to Diddy" in The Spectator, and is quoted by the Associated Press when the biggest federal cases break. The record behind the profile: a complete acquittal in a $26M money-laundering trial, RICO charges carrying a 10-year minimum dismissed, and 6 months on a $12M Ponzi case.

Why this firm.

SPODEK LAW GROUP P.C. · EST. 1976
01
Second generation, since 1976

Thousands of clients across five decades. We have dealt with your issue before.

02
Loyalty to only you

No allegiance to prosecutors or judges. The client is the only constituency.

03
Nationwide, fully online

A complete client portal - documents, invoices, communications - coast to coast.

04
Selective by design

We only take clients we can truly help - and every accepted case gets the whole bench.

THE FIRM FILM · 00:45 · WHO WE ARE
ALL APPEARANCES →
45 SECONDS INSIDE THE FIRM

See who fights for you before you ever call.

Who we are, how we work, and why clients nationwide trust us with their future - in under a minute.

The Spodek Law Group P.C. bench

The team on your case.

EVERY ACCEPTED CASE GETS THE WHOLE BENCH · 24/7
Meet the bench →
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER
Todd A. Spodek
The Netflix defense · Fox & CNN analyst
Ralph P. Franco, Jr.
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Ralph P. Franco, Jr.
Court appearances · case strategy
Alex Zhik
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Alex Zhik
Criminal defense · client strategy
Jeremy Feigenbaum, working the file
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Jeremy Feigenbaum
Motions · investigations
Claire Banks
ASSOCIATE
Claire Banks
Federal motions · S.D.N.Y. & E.D.N.Y.
Joseph Alter
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Joseph Alter
Trial practice · not guilty on all counts, 2025
RB
OF-COUNSEL
Rajesh Barua
Immigration · removal defense
CL
OF-COUNSEL
Chad Lewin
Los Angeles · 23+ years
50+ years combined
Second generation, since 1976. Selective by design - loyal to only you.
PUT THEM ON YOUR CASE →

How your case unfolds.

THE FULL PROCESS →
01 · TODAY
The consultation

Risk-free, in person or by phone. Ask anything, for as long as it takes. Strategy starts the same day.

02
Investigation & evidence

Witnesses, reports, footage, experts - building the record that pokes holes in theirs.

03
Motions, negotiation - or trial

Suppress, dismiss, negotiate from strength. And if trial is the advantage - we are unafraid.

★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"The best lawyer anyone could ask for. Todd changed our lives."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
FROM THE RECORD · S.D.N.Y. & BEYOND
Acquittal$26M money laundering
DismissedRICO - 10-year mandatory minimum
6 months$12M Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
RISK FREE · CONFIDENTIAL · 24/7

Get ahead of the case.

Answered within 24 hours, guaranteed. Some stories are better told out loud -

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02Free, confidential consultation - ask us anything, regardless of how long it takes. 03Strategy starts the same day - and you hold the senior partner's cell number.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL
24/7
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
01
02
03
04
05
EVERYTHING YOU SHARE IS PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE FROM THE FIRST WORD.