Attorney on call · 24/7 · Risk-free consultation
212 300 5196
SECTION B · PROCEDURAL STAGE · B23

Reading a determination letter for appealable error.

The determination letter is not just an outcome. It is a regulated document that must contain specific elements, and reading it line by line against those requirements is how appeals are built - on a clock that is frequently ten days or fewer.
CALENDAR IT FIRST
Before reading it properly, find the appeal deadline and diarise it. Windows of three to ten days are common and they are enforced strictly.
WHICH RULES GOVERN YOUR CASE The 2020 Title IX regulations. The 2024 rewrite was vacated and does not apply.
RULE TRACKER →
THE BRIEFING · THE DETERMINATION LETTER

A determination letter is a regulated document with mandatory contents. Most respondents read it once, for the outcome. Read properly, against the requirements, it is the map of the appeal.

The required contents.

The rule specifies what a written determination must include: identification of the allegations, a description of the procedural steps taken, findings of fact supporting the determination, conclusions applying the code of conduct to the facts, a statement of and rationale for the result as to each allegation, any disciplinary sanctions and whether remedies will be provided, and the procedures and permissible bases for appeal.

Where letters fall short.

The most common defect is the absence of findings of fact. A letter that summarises what each party said and then announces a conclusion has not made findings and has not applied the policy to them. Others rest on conduct that never appeared in the notice, treat a respondent’s non-participation as corroborative, rely on material the institution declined to produce, or state a standard of proof different from the one the policy adopts. Each of these is visible on the face of the document and each is a procedural ground.

The clock, and what to do with it.

Appeal windows are short - three to ten days is typical - and they run from the date of the letter rather than from when it was read or understood. The deadline is calendared before the letter is analysed. Then the letter is read against the requirements, the defects listed with the specific text at issue, and the appeal drafted around the ground that has both a documented departure and a demonstrable effect on the outcome.

Why you should call us.

If you are scrolling through search results trying to find someone to defend you, your search is over. You have found Spodek Law Group P.C. - and we are not your average defense firm. We know a thing or two about defending the accused in campus cases - and in the criminal courts that run alongside them. Over 50 years of combined experience, some of the toughest cases in the country, and we have come out on top. We have seen it all, and we empathise with you. We understand how frightening this is, and we have a legal team who can fight and win.

Unlike other attorneys who care about their reputation with the administrators and the prosecutors, our only goal is getting you the best outcome. We owe loyalty to only you. Our lawyers listen to you, your fears, and your goals. We care about your story, and that is where the work begins - by understanding and listening to you.

On billing, we are transparent about our fees, and there are no surprises. Choosing a lawyer is a big deal and cost is a real issue, so we are committed to being your champion irrespective of your ability to pay. Our firm has a simple belief: lawyers should only take on clients whom they can truly help. Many firms are mills that take every case through the door. We do not.

Working with us starts with a risk-free consultation, in person or over the phone. You can ask us anything, for as long as it takes, and we encourage you to ask the tough questions. We are available 24/7, we practise coast to coast, and every client has direct access to a partner. Call 212 300 5196 - an attorney answers.

GENERAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE. YOUR SCHOOL’S POLICY AND YOUR FACTS DECIDE EVERYTHING - AND THE CONSULTATION IS FREE. Skip reading - just call →
WHAT THE LETTER MUST CONTAIN
Six required elements.
Each omission is a procedural argument. Compare the letter against this list before anything else.
REQ 01
The allegations
Identification of the allegations potentially constituting sexual harassment.
CHECK SCOPE
REQ 02
The procedural steps
Notifications, interviews, evidence gathering, methods of notice, and hearings held.
AUDIT IT
REQ 03
Findings of fact
Findings applied to the facts - not a recital of the allegations restated as conclusions.
MOST COMMON GAP
REQ 04
Conclusions on the code
Application of the policy to the facts found, provision by provision.
ELEMENT ANALYSIS
REQ 05
Rationale for each result
A stated reason for the result on each allegation, plus sanctions and remedies.
READ CLOSELY
REQ 06
Appeal information
The procedures and permissible bases for either party to appeal.
THE CLOCK
The most frequent defect. A letter that recites the competing accounts and announces a conclusion, without findings of fact and without applying the policy to those findings, has not done what the rule requires. That is procedural irregularity, and it is visible on the face of the document.
READING IT FOR ERROR
Five things to look for.
This is the checklist we work through the day a determination arrives.
01Conduct never noticed
A finding resting on conduct that was not in the notice of allegations.
02Silence treated as evidence
Any reliance on non-participation, which departs from the presumption.
03Excluded evidence relied on
Material the school refused to produce, appearing in the reasoning.
04The standard misstated
A letter reciting the wrong standard of proof, or applying it inconsistently.
05Sanction without rationale
Sanctions imposed with no stated reason, which many policies require.
KEEP READING · THE TITLE IX SET
Where this page hands you off.
No page on this site is a dead end. These are the next questions people ask after this one, in the order they usually ask them.
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
FIG. - THE PRINCIPAL
THE LAWYER THE PRESS CALLS
You've seen the defense on Netflix. This is the firm behind it.

Todd A. Spodek is a second-generation trial lawyer whose defense of Anna Delvey became Netflix's Inventing Anna. He appears on Fox News and CNN as a legal analyst, authored "My Advice to Diddy" in The Spectator, and is quoted by the Associated Press when the biggest federal cases break. The record behind the profile: a complete acquittal in a $26M money-laundering trial, RICO charges carrying a 10-year minimum dismissed, and 6 months on a $12M Ponzi case.

Why this firm.

SPODEK LAW GROUP P.C. · EST. 1976
01
Second generation, since 1976

Thousands of clients across five decades. We have dealt with your issue before.

02
Loyalty to only you

No allegiance to prosecutors or judges. The client is the only constituency.

03
Nationwide, fully online

A complete client portal - documents, invoices, communications - coast to coast.

04
Selective by design

We only take clients we can truly help - and every accepted case gets the whole bench.

THE FIRM FILM · 00:45 · WHO WE ARE
ALL APPEARANCES →
45 SECONDS INSIDE THE FIRM

See who fights for you before you ever call.

Who we are, how we work, and why clients nationwide trust us with their future - in under a minute.

The Spodek Law Group P.C. bench

The team on your case.

EVERY ACCEPTED CASE GETS THE WHOLE BENCH · 24/7
Meet the bench →
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER
Todd A. Spodek
The Netflix defense · Fox & CNN analyst
Ralph P. Franco, Jr.
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Ralph P. Franco, Jr.
Court appearances · case strategy
Alex Zhik
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Alex Zhik
Criminal defense · client strategy
Jeremy Feigenbaum, working the file
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Jeremy Feigenbaum
Motions · investigations
Claire Banks
ASSOCIATE
Claire Banks
Federal motions · S.D.N.Y. & E.D.N.Y.
Joseph Alter
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Joseph Alter
Trial practice · not guilty on all counts, 2025
RB
OF-COUNSEL
Rajesh Barua
Immigration · removal defense
CL
OF-COUNSEL
Chad Lewin
Los Angeles · 23+ years
50+ years combined
Second generation, since 1976. Selective by design - loyal to only you.
PUT THEM ON YOUR CASE →

How your case unfolds.

THE FULL PROCESS →
01 · TODAY
The consultation

Risk-free, in person or by phone. Ask anything, for as long as it takes. Strategy starts the same day.

02
Investigation & evidence

Witnesses, reports, footage, experts - building the record that pokes holes in theirs.

03
Motions, negotiation - or trial

Suppress, dismiss, negotiate from strength. And if trial is the advantage - we are unafraid.

★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"The best lawyer anyone could ask for. Todd changed our lives."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
FROM THE RECORD · S.D.N.Y. & BEYOND
Acquittal$26M money laundering
DismissedRICO - 10-year mandatory minimum
6 months$12M Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
RISK FREE · CONFIDENTIAL · 24/7

Get ahead of the case.

Answered within 24 hours, guaranteed. Some stories are better told out loud -

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02Free, confidential consultation - ask us anything, regardless of how long it takes. 03Strategy starts the same day - and you hold the senior partner's cell number.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL
24/7
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
01
02
03
04
05
EVERYTHING YOU SHARE IS PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE FROM THE FIRST WORD.