Attorney on call · 24/7 · Risk-free consultation
212 300 5196
SECTION E · CONSEQUENCES · E09

Scholarship and eligibility consequences for athletes.

An athlete under investigation faces consequences that arrive before any finding and outside the conduct process entirely: a suspension from competition imposed by a coach, an athletic department removal, a scholarship non-renewal, and an eligibility clock that does not stop while the case runs.
THE TIMING PROBLEM
Eligibility years and scholarship periods are fixed. A season lost to an interim measure is not recoverable by winning the hearing eight weeks later.
WHICH RULES GOVERN YOUR CASE The 2020 Title IX regulations. The 2024 rewrite was vacated and does not apply.
RULE TRACKER →
THE BRIEFING · ATHLETES AND CAMPUS DISCIPLINE

For an athlete, the campus process is rarely the first consequence. A coach or athletic department decision arrives within days, before any finding, and it operates outside the conduct system with little or no procedure attached.

Why the interim removal is the case.

Eligibility is finite and seasons are fixed. A suspension from competition imposed as a supportive measure and lifted after a hearing eight weeks later has already cost a season that cannot be recovered. That makes the challenge to the interim measure the most valuable work available - and the strongest argument is that removal from competition does nothing to restore or preserve anyone’s equal access to education, which is what the regulation requires of a supportive measure.

Three separate decision-makers.

The Title IX office runs the grievance process. The athletic department decides participation. The financial aid office decides scholarship renewal, which for athletic aid is typically an annual award with its own appeal procedure. These are frequently conflated by families and never by the institution - each needs to be addressed on its own terms and within its own deadline.

Publicity, and the coach conversation.

Athlete matters attract attention, which increases the likelihood of police involvement and of the case reaching people with reporting obligations. Nothing said to a coach, a trainer, or an academic advisor is privileged, and many of them are mandatory reporters under institutional policy or the Clery Act. The conversation an athlete has with a coach in the first days is frequently the first document in the file.

Why you should call us.

If you are scrolling through search results trying to find someone to defend you, your search is over. You have found Spodek Law Group P.C. - and we are not your average defense firm. We know a thing or two about defending the accused in campus cases - and in the criminal courts that run alongside them. Over 50 years of combined experience, some of the toughest cases in the country, and we have come out on top. We have seen it all, and we empathise with you. We understand how frightening this is, and we have a legal team who can fight and win.

Unlike other attorneys who care about their reputation with the administrators and the prosecutors, our only goal is getting you the best outcome. We owe loyalty to only you. Our lawyers listen to you, your fears, and your goals. We care about your story, and that is where the work begins - by understanding and listening to you.

On billing, we are transparent about our fees, and there are no surprises. Choosing a lawyer is a big deal and cost is a real issue, so we are committed to being your champion irrespective of your ability to pay. Our firm has a simple belief: lawyers should only take on clients whom they can truly help. Many firms are mills that take every case through the door. We do not.

Working with us starts with a risk-free consultation, in person or over the phone. You can ask us anything, for as long as it takes, and we encourage you to ask the tough questions. We are available 24/7, we practise coast to coast, and every client has direct access to a partner. Call 212 300 5196 - an attorney answers.

GENERAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE. YOUR SCHOOL’S POLICY AND YOUR FACTS DECIDE EVERYTHING - AND THE CONSULTATION IS FREE. Skip reading - just call →
FIVE CONSEQUENCES, NONE REQUIRING A FINDING
What happens before anything is decided.
Each of these operates independently of the Title IX process, and each is addressed differently.
HIT 01
Competition suspension
Imposed by a coach or department, often immediately, and generally not appealable through the conduct process.
NO FINDING NEEDED
HIT 02
Team removal
A separate departmental decision with its own procedure, or none.
DEPARTMENTAL
HIT 03
Scholarship non-renewal
Athletic aid is typically annual. Non-renewal is a distinct decision with its own appeal route.
ANNUAL AWARD
HIT 04
Eligibility clock
Continues to run. A lost season is a lost year of a finite allocation.
IRRECOVERABLE
HIT 05
Transfer consequences
Conduct history affects transfer prospects and, at the next institution, eligibility questions.
DOWNSTREAM
Where the argument is actually made. Athletic suspension imposed as a supportive measure is challengeable - it does nothing to restore anyone’s educational access and functions purely as a penalty before adjudication. That objection, made in writing citing the non-punitive requirement, is one of the strongest available.
WHAT WE DO IN ATHLETE CASES
Four priorities.
Speed matters more here than in any other category except immigration status.
01Challenge the interim removal first
Before the hearing, in writing, on the non-punitive requirement. A season is at stake.
02Separate the aid decision
Scholarship non-renewal has its own procedure and appeal. It is not part of the conduct case.
03Compress the timeline
Request expedition where a competition period is running. Institutions can move faster than they do.
04Protect the criminal track
Athlete cases attract publicity and police attention. Nothing said to a coach is privileged.
KEEP READING · THE TITLE IX SET
Where this page hands you off.
No page on this site is a dead end. These are the next questions people ask after this one, in the order they usually ask them.
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
FIG. - THE PRINCIPAL
THE LAWYER THE PRESS CALLS
You've seen the defense on Netflix. This is the firm behind it.

Todd A. Spodek is a second-generation trial lawyer whose defense of Anna Delvey became Netflix's Inventing Anna. He appears on Fox News and CNN as a legal analyst, authored "My Advice to Diddy" in The Spectator, and is quoted by the Associated Press when the biggest federal cases break. The record behind the profile: a complete acquittal in a $26M money-laundering trial, RICO charges carrying a 10-year minimum dismissed, and 6 months on a $12M Ponzi case.

Why this firm.

SPODEK LAW GROUP P.C. · EST. 1976
01
Second generation, since 1976

Thousands of clients across five decades. We have dealt with your issue before.

02
Loyalty to only you

No allegiance to prosecutors or judges. The client is the only constituency.

03
Nationwide, fully online

A complete client portal - documents, invoices, communications - coast to coast.

04
Selective by design

We only take clients we can truly help - and every accepted case gets the whole bench.

THE FIRM FILM · 00:45 · WHO WE ARE
ALL APPEARANCES →
45 SECONDS INSIDE THE FIRM

See who fights for you before you ever call.

Who we are, how we work, and why clients nationwide trust us with their future - in under a minute.

The Spodek Law Group P.C. bench

The team on your case.

EVERY ACCEPTED CASE GETS THE WHOLE BENCH · 24/7
Meet the bench →
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER
Todd A. Spodek
The Netflix defense · Fox & CNN analyst
Ralph P. Franco, Jr.
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Ralph P. Franco, Jr.
Court appearances · case strategy
Alex Zhik
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Alex Zhik
Criminal defense · client strategy
Jeremy Feigenbaum, working the file
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Jeremy Feigenbaum
Motions · investigations
Claire Banks
ASSOCIATE
Claire Banks
Federal motions · S.D.N.Y. & E.D.N.Y.
Joseph Alter
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Joseph Alter
Trial practice · not guilty on all counts, 2025
RB
OF-COUNSEL
Rajesh Barua
Immigration · removal defense
CL
OF-COUNSEL
Chad Lewin
Los Angeles · 23+ years
50+ years combined
Second generation, since 1976. Selective by design - loyal to only you.
PUT THEM ON YOUR CASE →

How your case unfolds.

THE FULL PROCESS →
01 · TODAY
The consultation

Risk-free, in person or by phone. Ask anything, for as long as it takes. Strategy starts the same day.

02
Investigation & evidence

Witnesses, reports, footage, experts - building the record that pokes holes in theirs.

03
Motions, negotiation - or trial

Suppress, dismiss, negotiate from strength. And if trial is the advantage - we are unafraid.

★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"The best lawyer anyone could ask for. Todd changed our lives."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
FROM THE RECORD · S.D.N.Y. & BEYOND
Acquittal$26M money laundering
DismissedRICO - 10-year mandatory minimum
6 months$12M Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
RISK FREE · CONFIDENTIAL · 24/7

Get ahead of the case.

Answered within 24 hours, guaranteed. Some stories are better told out loud -

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02Free, confidential consultation - ask us anything, regardless of how long it takes. 03Strategy starts the same day - and you hold the senior partner's cell number.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL
24/7
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
01
02
03
04
05
EVERYTHING YOU SHARE IS PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE FROM THE FIRST WORD.