Attorney on call · 24/7 · Risk-free consultation
212 300 5196
FROM THE DEFENSE DESK

DIVORCE AND FAMILY LAW

6 MIN READ

BY

NYC Emotional Distress Divorce Lawyers

Emotional distress can be a contributing factor for irreparable differences, which can be a way to file for a divorce. If you feel your spouse is being cruel,...

Risk free · Confidential · No obligation

Tell us what you’re facing. The consultation is free, confidential, and answered within 24 hours - or call directly:

212 300 5196

After you reach out

01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02Free, confidential consultation - ask us anything, regardless of how long it takes. 03Strategy starts the same day - and you hold the senior partner’s cell number.

★★★★★1,100+ five-star Google reviews
Super Lawyers · 2020-25Avvo · “Superb”Second generation · Since 1976
As seen on Netflix · CNN · Fox News · NY Post

50+

Years, combined

1,100+

Five-star reviews

1976

Second generation, since

Acquitted.

$26M MONEY LAUNDERING

Dismissed.

RICO · 10-YEAR MINIMUM FACED

Six months.

$12M PONZI · YEARS ASKED
ALL RESULTS →

Netflix · 2022 · Created by Shonda Rhimes

You’ve seen the show. This is the real defense.

Netflix’s Inventing Anna dramatized Todd Spodek’s defense of Anna Delvey - the “fake heiress” who captivated New York. Todd is portrayed by Arian Moayed of Succession; the strategy on screen is the strategy he argued in the real courtroom.

“Just like Sinatra had to do it his way, Anna had to do it her way.

Todd’s opening statement · The Sorokin trial, 2019

#1

Most watched on Netflix

196

Countries streaming

320M+

Hours viewed

Bring this defense to your case → Read the Anna Delvey file →
Inventing Anna on Netflix - Todd Spodek's Anna Delvey defense dramatized
The official trailer · Inventing Anna Todd portrayed by Arian Moayed

Emotional distress can be a contributing factor for irreparable differences, which can be a way to file for a divorce. If you feel your spouse is being cruel, that can be interpreted by the court -as a sign of domestic violence. Contrary to popular belief, any type of repetitive - abusive - or inhumane treatment, is considered domestic violence. Typically, cruelty in this manner is thought of as physical - but it can also be emotional harm as well - such violent language, verbal abuse, or threats.

As a result, if you feel there is emotional distress - this may be a sign of domestic violence, which is definitely grounds for divorce! Courts look out for signs of domestic violence and cruelty in marriages all the time. Examples of cruelty, which can lead to emotional distress, are:

-Physical attacks

-Continous rage, anger, screaming, or yelling

-Constant belittling, or criticizing , of the spouse

-Flaunting an adulterous relationship

-Falsely accusing the spouse of actions

-Failing to tell the spouse pertinent information - which is important for the safety of the spouse

At the end of the day, the unifying element is the fact there is a disconnect between the spouses - and there is signs of inhumane treatment - which is negatively impacting one, or more, of the spouses. Divorces where cruelty/domestic violence is in question can be hard to prove. In order to support your divorce case, our NYC divorce lawyers highly recommend you keep things like police reports, medical records, text messages, emails, and any other evidence which can help demonstrate the abuse you have been suffering.

In some states, cruelty and neglect can be grounds for divorce. For example, if a spouse has abandoned his/her family without providing financial support - this can be a sign of cruelty. Abandonment is easier to prove than cruelty.

If your trying to get a “fault” divorce, based on cruelty/abuse/emotional distress - then the burden of proof is on you. You have to be able to prove that you are experiencing cruelty and that staying in the marriage is impossible. Claiming you married a mean husband isn’t enough. In order to prove emotional distress, you have to prove the spouse is doing the same thing - over and over again, with the intent of maliciously hurting you. Things like text messages, police reports, and other such demonstrative evidence is what a court will look for.  Need more information? Speak to one of our NYC divorce lawyers today, who can help provide guidance when you need it the most.

Corporal Injury on a Child

Corporal injury, also known as corporal punishment, is the use of physical force to discipline a child. While the definition simplifies how this act is described, New York’s laws are not as clearly defined. Exceptions between private and public schools, as well as who performs the act of discipline, is open to interpretation.

For instance, New York does not permit corporal punishment in public schools, but private schools may use this form of discipline with parental consent. The exception to this and within the household changes if the physical force is considered child abuse or assault and battery.

Is Corporal Injury on a Child Legal in New York?

Although corporal punishment is legal in the state, it does not mean that child services will not get involved in certain cases. One family might perceive spanking children as something that is perfectly normal. Another might deem an act of child discipline too harsh. The result can be a claim, sometimes arising during a child custody battle, where one parent considers the discipline of the other parent as abusive.

In the end, social workers are usually called in to make the judgment call on how the child was affected. The final determination can lead to the arrest of one parent and profoundly impact the entire family.

Moral arguments aside, there are some legal aspects to consider. One law holds that a child under 18 years of age can be legally neglected when her emotional, mental or physical condition is impaired. The law also holds that neglect occurs if there is imminent danger from a parent or caregiver who inflicts or allows unreasonable harm, which includes excessive corporal punishment.

Criminal Law on Corporal Injury

New York’s law on corporal injury is very broad and open to many degrees of interpretation. The criminal law, however, provides a narrower definition on what is justified use of physical force against children.

By law, a parent, guardian or any person who is entrusted with caring for and supervising another person who is under 21 is permitted to use physical force upon that person. This does not, however, include using deadly force. Further, the physical force must be reasonably necessary to maintain discipline or promote the positive welfare of the person.

Open to interpretation is how “reasonably” is applied to the rule of law regarding assault, battery and vicarious liability.

An assault charge may occur if the child or parent makes the claim against a teacher, school employee or the school. Even the threat or attempt of assault with the intent to inflict injury can lead to charges when paired with the alleged victim’s apprehension of injury.

Battery charges involve the intentional tort defined as unwanted touching. In this case the victim does not necessarily feel pain but the unwanted touching is something that a normal person would find offensive. Pulling on clothes or even grabbing a backpack could be defined as an act of battery.

In the case of vicarious liability, New York law permits a victim of corporal injury to sue an employer when an employee causes harm during the scope of the employee’s employment. For example, a teacher may use physical force to punish his student during class time or any other scope of duties. If so, the parents and the student might have a claim against the school, in addition to bringing charges against the teacher.

Work with a Skilled criminal attorney

If you are facing charges of corporal injury on a child, you need a proactive legal strategy. Guilt or innocence might not be enough to overcome the stigma of being accuse. Attorneys at Raiser & Kenniff, PC will use our years of prosecuting experience to build the best defense on your behalf.

General information, not legal advice. Your facts decide everything - and the consultation is free. Skip reading - just call →

“By the time our free consultation was over, we left at ease.

Verified client · Federal case · 2022 · via Google reviews

Read the reviews →


Risk free · Confidential · 24/7

Stop reading. Start defending.

The consultation is free, confidential, and answered within 24 hours - guaranteed. An attorney is on call right now.