Attorney on call · 24/7 · Risk-free consultation
212 300 5196
SECTION D · THE CRIMINAL OVERLAP · D07

When the prosecutor asks the school for your file.

Title IX records are not immune from criminal process. A prosecutor or a defense subpoena can reach the investigative file, the evidence the school collected, the hearing recording, and your own statements - and the school will comply. Most respondents learn this after it has already happened, in a notice letter.
IF YOU RECEIVE THAT NOTICE
Do not call the Title IX office to ask what was sent. Call counsel. There is a narrow window in which objections can be raised, and a much larger amount of work available in controlling what happens next.
WHICH RULES GOVERN YOUR CASE The 2020 Title IX regulations. The 2024 rewrite was vacated and does not apply.
RULE TRACKER →
THE BRIEFING · SUBPOENAS FOR TITLE IX RECORDS

A Title IX file is an education record, and education records can be subpoenaed. When a prosecutor, a grand jury, or a defendant in a related matter seeks the school’s investigative file, the institution complies with lawful process - and the student ordinarily finds out through a notice letter sent at the same time or afterward.

The mechanism.

FERPA restricts disclosure of education records but permits it in response to a lawful subpoena or judicial order, generally on condition that the school make a reasonable effort to notify the student in advance so that protective action can be sought. In practice, notice is short and the school’s posture is compliance. There is no Title IX privilege to assert, and the coordinator is not going to litigate on your behalf.

What the file contains that you did not write.

Respondents think of the file as their own statements plus the messages they produced. It is considerably more. The investigative report is the school’s narrative of the evidence, frequently including observations about credibility and demeanor - written by a non-lawyer, without rules of evidence, and now sitting in a prosecutor’s hands as a characterization of you. Interview summaries paraphrase what you said without your review. The hearing recording, required by regulation, captures your testimony verbatim.

What can still be done.

Read the subpoena for scope, issuing court, and return date. Overbroad requests that sweep in unrelated records or third-party material can be objected to, and the window for that objection is short. Obtain the actual production set from the school, because you cannot defend a file you have not read. Inspect the hearing record and correct transcription errors in writing while correction remains possible. Above all, align the campus and criminal positions - contradiction between the two is more damaging than any single document in either.

The file cuts both ways.

It is worth saying plainly that a subpoenaed campus file is not purely a liability. It can contain prior inconsistent accounts, exculpatory messages the school collected and discounted, and procedural irregularities that undercut the reliability of the whole record. Handled by counsel who read it as a litigator rather than a respondent, the same production that worries you can become useful.

The lesson that comes too late.

Every problem on this page traces back to a week that is now months gone: the week when a statement was written without counsel, when evidence was produced selectively, when an interview happened because it seemed uncooperative to decline. That is why we take these calls on the day the notice of allegations arrives, and why the first advice is almost always the same - stop writing, preserve everything, and let someone who can see both cases decide what gets said.

Why you should call us.

If you are scrolling through search results trying to find someone to defend you, your search is over. You have found Spodek Law Group P.C. - and we are not your average defense firm. We know a thing or two about defending the accused in campus cases - and in the criminal courts that run alongside them. Over 50 years of combined experience, some of the toughest cases in the country, and we have come out on top. We have seen it all, and we empathise with you. We understand how frightening this is, and we have a legal team who can fight and win.

Unlike other attorneys who care about their reputation with the administrators and the prosecutors, our only goal is getting you the best outcome. We owe loyalty to only you. Our lawyers listen to you, your fears, and your goals. We care about your story, and that is where the work begins - by understanding and listening to you.

On billing, we are transparent about our fees, and there are no surprises. Choosing a lawyer is a big deal and cost is a real issue, so we are committed to being your champion irrespective of your ability to pay. Our firm has a simple belief: lawyers should only take on clients whom they can truly help. Many firms are mills that take every case through the door. We do not.

Working with us starts with a risk-free consultation, in person or over the phone. You can ask us anything, for as long as it takes, and we encourage you to ask the tough questions. We are available 24/7, we practise coast to coast, and every client has direct access to a partner. Call 212 300 5196 - an attorney answers.

GENERAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE. YOUR SCHOOL’S POLICY AND YOUR FACTS DECIDE EVERYTHING - AND THE CONSULTATION IS FREE. Skip reading - just call →
WHAT IS IN THE FILE
Everything, and more than you produced.
The campus file is broader than the evidence you handed over. It includes the school’s own work product - and that work product characterizes you.
ITEM 01
Your written statements
Every submission, including drafts if the school retained them.
YOUR OWN WORDS
ITEM 02
Interview records
Transcripts or the investigator’s summaries, which paraphrase you without your review.
PARAPHRASED
ITEM 03
The investigative report
The school’s narrative of the evidence, with credibility observations.
CHARACTERIZATION
ITEM 04
Evidence collected
Messages, images, card-swipe and video obtained by the school from any party.
BOTH SIDES
ITEM 05
The hearing recording
Required by regulation. Your testimony and your advisor’s cross, in full.
ON THE RECORD
ITEM 06
The determination and appeal
The finding, the reasoning, the sanction, and everything filed on appeal.
THE CONCLUSION
FERPA is a notice rule, not a wall. Education-record protections generally require the school to make a reasonable effort to notify the student before complying with a judicial order or subpoena - so notice is often the only protection that operates, and it arrives late.
WHAT CAN STILL BE DONE
Late is not the same as nothing.
Once process has issued, the useful work shifts from prevention to control. These are the steps that actually change outcomes at this stage.
01Read the subpoena
Scope, issuing court, and return date. Overbroad requests can be narrowed, and sometimes should be.
02Move to quash or limit
Where the request sweeps in irrelevant records or third-party material, an objection is available and time-limited.
03Get what the school sent
Request the production set. You cannot defend a file you have not read.
04Inspect the hearing record
Errors in a transcript matter more once a prosecutor is reading it. Correct in writing.
05Align the two defenses
The campus and criminal positions must be consistent. Contradiction between them is the real damage.
06Use it, where it helps
The file can also contain exculpatory material and prior inconsistent accounts. It is evidence in both directions.
WHAT NOT TO DO NOW
Four instincts to override.
Everything on this list feels like taking control. Each one makes the criminal case worse.
01Do not contact the school
Calls to the coordinator become notes in the same file, and notes are producible.
02Do not supplement the record
Sending a clarification now creates a new statement, dated after you knew charges were coming.
03Do not delete anything
Deletion after notice of process is obstruction, and it is provable.
04Do not talk to witnesses
Outreach at this stage reads as tampering regardless of intent.
KEEP READING · THE OVERLAP SET
Where this page hands you off.
No page on this site is a dead end. These are the next questions people ask after this one, in the order they usually ask them.
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
FIG. - THE PRINCIPAL
THE LAWYER THE PRESS CALLS
You've seen the defense on Netflix. This is the firm behind it.

Todd A. Spodek is a second-generation trial lawyer whose defense of Anna Delvey became Netflix's Inventing Anna. He appears on Fox News and CNN as a legal analyst, authored "My Advice to Diddy" in The Spectator, and is quoted by the Associated Press when the biggest federal cases break. The record behind the profile: a complete acquittal in a $26M money-laundering trial, RICO charges carrying a 10-year minimum dismissed, and 6 months on a $12M Ponzi case.

Why this firm.

SPODEK LAW GROUP P.C. · EST. 1976
01
Second generation, since 1976

Thousands of clients across five decades. We have dealt with your issue before.

02
Loyalty to only you

No allegiance to prosecutors or judges. The client is the only constituency.

03
Nationwide, fully online

A complete client portal - documents, invoices, communications - coast to coast.

04
Selective by design

We only take clients we can truly help - and every accepted case gets the whole bench.

THE FIRM FILM · 00:45 · WHO WE ARE
ALL APPEARANCES →
45 SECONDS INSIDE THE FIRM

See who fights for you before you ever call.

Who we are, how we work, and why clients nationwide trust us with their future - in under a minute.

The Spodek Law Group P.C. bench

The team on your case.

EVERY ACCEPTED CASE GETS THE WHOLE BENCH · 24/7
Meet the bench →
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER
Todd A. Spodek
The Netflix defense · Fox & CNN analyst
Ralph P. Franco, Jr.
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Ralph P. Franco, Jr.
Court appearances · case strategy
Alex Zhik
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Alex Zhik
Criminal defense · client strategy
Jeremy Feigenbaum, working the file
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Jeremy Feigenbaum
Motions · investigations
Claire Banks
ASSOCIATE
Claire Banks
Federal motions · S.D.N.Y. & E.D.N.Y.
Joseph Alter
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Joseph Alter
Trial practice · not guilty on all counts, 2025
RB
OF-COUNSEL
Rajesh Barua
Immigration · removal defense
CL
OF-COUNSEL
Chad Lewin
Los Angeles · 23+ years
50+ years combined
Second generation, since 1976. Selective by design - loyal to only you.
PUT THEM ON YOUR CASE →

How your case unfolds.

THE FULL PROCESS →
01 · TODAY
The consultation

Risk-free, in person or by phone. Ask anything, for as long as it takes. Strategy starts the same day.

02
Investigation & evidence

Witnesses, reports, footage, experts - building the record that pokes holes in theirs.

03
Motions, negotiation - or trial

Suppress, dismiss, negotiate from strength. And if trial is the advantage - we are unafraid.

★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"The best lawyer anyone could ask for. Todd changed our lives."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
FROM THE RECORD · S.D.N.Y. & BEYOND
Acquittal$26M money laundering
DismissedRICO - 10-year mandatory minimum
6 months$12M Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
RISK FREE · CONFIDENTIAL · 24/7

Get ahead of the case.

Answered within 24 hours, guaranteed. Some stories are better told out loud -

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02Free, confidential consultation - ask us anything, regardless of how long it takes. 03Strategy starts the same day - and you hold the senior partner's cell number.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL
24/7
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
01
02
03
04
05
EVERYTHING YOU SHARE IS PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE FROM THE FIRST WORD.