Attorney on call · 24/7 · Risk-free consultation
212 300 5196
SECTION B · PROCEDURAL STAGE · B27

Remand after a successful appeal.

Most appeals that succeed do not reverse the finding - they send the matter back. A remand is a second chance and a second exposure: the process runs again, frequently before new people, and the defect that produced the remand is the thing to hold them to.
THE RISK NOBODY MENTIONS
A rehearing can reach the same outcome, and occasionally a worse sanction. Understanding what the remand actually ordered is the first task.
WHICH RULES GOVERN YOUR CASE The 2020 Title IX regulations. The 2024 rewrite was vacated and does not apply.
RULE TRACKER →
THE BRIEFING · REMAND AND REHEARING

A successful campus appeal usually produces a remand rather than a reversal. That is a genuine opportunity, and it carries risks respondents are rarely warned about.

Scope is everything.

The appeal decision states what is being remanded, and the range is wide: a complete rehearing, a new determination on the existing record, a corrected investigative report, or a fresh sanction decision alone. Establishing the scope in writing before anything else is the first task, because it determines what can be reargued and what is now settled against you.

Personnel, and the bias ground.

Where the appeal succeeded on conflict or bias, the same individual should not be conducting the second process, and asking for confirmation in writing is appropriate. Where the ground was procedural irregularity, new personnel may not be required - but the request costs nothing and the answer becomes part of the record.

The reopened investigation is an opportunity.

Where a remand reopens evidence-gathering, every request refused the first time can be made again, and the earlier refusal is now part of a record showing the institution was on notice. Material excluded from the original hearing may be admissible. And the ten-day windows run again, which means the most leveraged documents in the process can be written a second time with full knowledge of how the first attempt was received.

The exposure to ask about.

A rehearing can reach the same finding, and in some systems it can produce a heavier sanction than the one appealed. That question - whether the sanction can increase on remand - should be asked and answered in writing before the second process begins, because it changes the calculation about whether to proceed or to negotiate.

Why you should call us.

If you are scrolling through search results trying to find someone to defend you, your search is over. You have found Spodek Law Group P.C. - and we are not your average defense firm. We know a thing or two about defending the accused in campus cases - and in the criminal courts that run alongside them. Over 50 years of combined experience, some of the toughest cases in the country, and we have come out on top. We have seen it all, and we empathise with you. We understand how frightening this is, and we have a legal team who can fight and win.

Unlike other attorneys who care about their reputation with the administrators and the prosecutors, our only goal is getting you the best outcome. We owe loyalty to only you. Our lawyers listen to you, your fears, and your goals. We care about your story, and that is where the work begins - by understanding and listening to you.

On billing, we are transparent about our fees, and there are no surprises. Choosing a lawyer is a big deal and cost is a real issue, so we are committed to being your champion irrespective of your ability to pay. Our firm has a simple belief: lawyers should only take on clients whom they can truly help. Many firms are mills that take every case through the door. We do not.

Working with us starts with a risk-free consultation, in person or over the phone. You can ask us anything, for as long as it takes, and we encourage you to ask the tough questions. We are available 24/7, we practise coast to coast, and every client has direct access to a partner. Call 212 300 5196 - an attorney answers.

GENERAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE. YOUR SCHOOL’S POLICY AND YOUR FACTS DECIDE EVERYTHING - AND THE CONSULTATION IS FREE. Skip reading - just call →
WHAT A REMAND ACTUALLY DOES
Six variables.
The scope of the remand governs everything that follows, and it is stated in the appeal decision.
VAR 01
Scope
Full rehearing, or a limited step - a new hearing, a corrected report, a fresh determination.
READ IT CLOSELY
VAR 02
Personnel
Whether a new decision-maker is appointed. Where the defect was bias, it must be.
ASK
VAR 03
The record
Whether the existing evidence carries over or the investigation reopens.
MATERIAL
VAR 04
New evidence
A remand sometimes permits material the original process excluded.
OPPORTUNITY
VAR 05
Sanction exposure
Whether the sanction can increase. Ask before proceeding.
THE RISK
VAR 06
Timeline
A remand restarts deadlines, including any interim measures.
CHALLENGE AGAIN
Hold them to the defect. The remand exists because something specific went wrong. Where the same error recurs - the same decision-maker, the same withheld evidence, the same relevance ruling - that is a stronger appeal the second time, and it is closer to a judicial claim.
THE SECOND RUN
Four priorities.
Everything learned from the first process is available. Use it.
01Establish the scope in writing
What exactly is being redone, and what is settled.
02Demand new personnel where warranted
Particularly where bias or prejudgment was the ground.
03Re-file the evidence requests
A reopened investigation is a fresh opportunity to obtain what was refused.
04Re-challenge interim measures
They restart with the process, and the earlier justification may no longer hold.
KEEP READING · THE TITLE IX SET
Where this page hands you off.
No page on this site is a dead end. These are the next questions people ask after this one, in the order they usually ask them.
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
FIG. - THE PRINCIPAL
THE LAWYER THE PRESS CALLS
You've seen the defense on Netflix. This is the firm behind it.

Todd A. Spodek is a second-generation trial lawyer whose defense of Anna Delvey became Netflix's Inventing Anna. He appears on Fox News and CNN as a legal analyst, authored "My Advice to Diddy" in The Spectator, and is quoted by the Associated Press when the biggest federal cases break. The record behind the profile: a complete acquittal in a $26M money-laundering trial, RICO charges carrying a 10-year minimum dismissed, and 6 months on a $12M Ponzi case.

Why this firm.

SPODEK LAW GROUP P.C. · EST. 1976
01
Second generation, since 1976

Thousands of clients across five decades. We have dealt with your issue before.

02
Loyalty to only you

No allegiance to prosecutors or judges. The client is the only constituency.

03
Nationwide, fully online

A complete client portal - documents, invoices, communications - coast to coast.

04
Selective by design

We only take clients we can truly help - and every accepted case gets the whole bench.

THE FIRM FILM · 00:45 · WHO WE ARE
ALL APPEARANCES →
45 SECONDS INSIDE THE FIRM

See who fights for you before you ever call.

Who we are, how we work, and why clients nationwide trust us with their future - in under a minute.

The Spodek Law Group P.C. bench

The team on your case.

EVERY ACCEPTED CASE GETS THE WHOLE BENCH · 24/7
Meet the bench →
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER
Todd A. Spodek
The Netflix defense · Fox & CNN analyst
Ralph P. Franco, Jr.
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Ralph P. Franco, Jr.
Court appearances · case strategy
Alex Zhik
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Alex Zhik
Criminal defense · client strategy
Jeremy Feigenbaum, working the file
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Jeremy Feigenbaum
Motions · investigations
Claire Banks
ASSOCIATE
Claire Banks
Federal motions · S.D.N.Y. & E.D.N.Y.
Joseph Alter
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Joseph Alter
Trial practice · not guilty on all counts, 2025
RB
OF-COUNSEL
Rajesh Barua
Immigration · removal defense
CL
OF-COUNSEL
Chad Lewin
Los Angeles · 23+ years
50+ years combined
Second generation, since 1976. Selective by design - loyal to only you.
PUT THEM ON YOUR CASE →

How your case unfolds.

THE FULL PROCESS →
01 · TODAY
The consultation

Risk-free, in person or by phone. Ask anything, for as long as it takes. Strategy starts the same day.

02
Investigation & evidence

Witnesses, reports, footage, experts - building the record that pokes holes in theirs.

03
Motions, negotiation - or trial

Suppress, dismiss, negotiate from strength. And if trial is the advantage - we are unafraid.

★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"The best lawyer anyone could ask for. Todd changed our lives."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
FROM THE RECORD · S.D.N.Y. & BEYOND
Acquittal$26M money laundering
DismissedRICO - 10-year mandatory minimum
6 months$12M Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
RISK FREE · CONFIDENTIAL · 24/7

Get ahead of the case.

Answered within 24 hours, guaranteed. Some stories are better told out loud -

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02Free, confidential consultation - ask us anything, regardless of how long it takes. 03Strategy starts the same day - and you hold the senior partner's cell number.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL
24/7
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
01
02
03
04
05
EVERYTHING YOU SHARE IS PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE FROM THE FIRST WORD.