Attorney on call · 24/7 · Risk-free consultation
212 300 5196
SECTION D · THE CRIMINAL OVERLAP · D18

A school directive you break can become a criminal charge.

A campus no-contact order is not a court order. Violating it is a policy matter - until a court order also exists, or until the contact itself is charged as harassment or stalking. This is the quiet bridge between the two tracks, and it catches respondents who were trying to be reasonable rather than defiant.
THE RULE TO LIVE BY
Zero contact means zero. No message, no comment, no mutual friend carrying a word, no like on a post. If they contact you, do not answer - forward it to counsel and let us document it.
WHICH RULES GOVERN YOUR CASE The 2020 Title IX regulations. The 2024 rewrite was vacated and does not apply.
RULE TRACKER →
THE BRIEFING · NO-CONTACT ORDERS AND CRIMINAL CONTEMPT

A campus no-contact order arrives early, often within days of the complaint, and it is framed as a neutral supportive measure rather than a sanction. It is also the provision respondents breach most often - not out of defiance, but because the definition of contact is far broader than anyone assumes, and because the instinct to explain is powerful.

What the campus order is.

Under the 2020 regulations, schools may impose supportive measures that are non-disciplinary and non-punitive and that do not unreasonably burden either party. A no-contact directive is the most common. Because it is characterised as supportive rather than punitive, it typically issues without any finding and often without a hearing - and challenging it requires a written objection arguing that it unreasonably burdens you, which is a real argument where the order removes you from housing, a class, or a team.

What the court order is.

An order of protection is issued by a judge, frequently on application by a prosecutor after a police report. Its terms may differ from the campus order - a distance requirement, a residential exclusion, a prohibition on third-party contact - and the two documents are rarely aligned. Violation of the court order is criminal contempt, a distinct offense prosecuted independently of whatever the underlying allegation turns out to be. People are convicted of contempt in cases where the original allegation was never charged.

The definition of contact.

Contact includes messages, calls, and email; it also includes third-party communication, social media interaction, and in many formulations any deliberate presence in the same space. A message passed by a friend is your contact. A like on a post is documented activity. Responding to a message the other party sent you is still your violation - the order binds you regardless of who initiated.

The apology, again.

The most frequent violation is also the most damaging: a message intended to smooth things over. It breaches the order, and it supplies content that reads as an admission in both the campus determination and any criminal file. There is no version of this message that helps. If you feel the need to say it, say it to counsel.

What to do instead.

Document everything. If the other party contacts you, do not reply - screenshot it, forward it to counsel, and let us report it in writing, because an unreported inbound contact can later be characterised as a conversation. If you encounter them in a shared space, leave and note the time. Ask counsel to seek modification where the order interferes with a required class, a degree component, or housing, rather than deciding for yourself that a limited breach is reasonable.

Why you should call us.

If you are scrolling through search results trying to find someone to defend you, your search is over. You have found Spodek Law Group P.C. - and we are not your average defense firm. We know a thing or two about defending the accused in campus cases - and in the criminal courts that run alongside them. Over 50 years of combined experience, some of the toughest cases in the country, and we have come out on top. We have seen it all, and we empathise with you. We understand how frightening this is, and we have a legal team who can fight and win.

Unlike other attorneys who care about their reputation with the administrators and the prosecutors, our only goal is getting you the best outcome. We owe loyalty to only you. Our lawyers listen to you, your fears, and your goals. We care about your story, and that is where the work begins - by understanding and listening to you.

On billing, we are transparent about our fees, and there are no surprises. Choosing a lawyer is a big deal and cost is a real issue, so we are committed to being your champion irrespective of your ability to pay. Our firm has a simple belief: lawyers should only take on clients whom they can truly help. Many firms are mills that take every case through the door. We do not.

Working with us starts with a risk-free consultation, in person or over the phone. You can ask us anything, for as long as it takes, and we encourage you to ask the tough questions. We are available 24/7, we practise coast to coast, and every client has direct access to a partner. Call 212 300 5196 - an attorney answers.

GENERAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE. YOUR SCHOOL’S POLICY AND YOUR FACTS DECIDE EVERYTHING - AND THE CONSULTATION IS FREE. Skip reading - just call →
TWO ORDERS, TWO ENFORCEMENT REGIMES
And how one turns into the other.
People conflate these constantly. The distinction determines whether a violation costs you a sanction or a night in a cell.
ORDER 01
Campus no-contact order
Issued by the Title IX office as a supportive measure. Enforced by the conduct system.
POLICY SANCTION
ORDER 02
Court order of protection
Issued by a judge, often at a prosecutor’s request. Enforced by arrest.
CRIMINAL EXPOSURE
ORDER 03
Both at once
Common where a police report exists. Two sets of terms, and they are rarely identical.
READ BOTH
BRIDGE 01
Contact charged directly
Repeated contact after a request to stop can support harassment or stalking counts on its own.
NO ORDER NEEDED
BRIDGE 02
Criminal contempt
Violating a court order is a separate crime, prosecuted independently of the underlying allegation.
STANDALONE COUNT
BRIDGE 03
Campus ban as trespass
Persona non grata status makes presence on campus a trespass, enforceable by arrest.
ARRESTABLE
Mutual is not the same as safe. Many campus orders are written as mutual, which sounds even-handed and creates a trap: an incidental encounter in a dining hall or a shared class can be reported as a violation by either party, and the respondent is the one who gets investigated.
THE CONTACT TRAPS
Six ways respondents violate without meaning to.
None of these feels like contact at the time. All six have produced charges.
01Through a friend
A third party passing a message is your contact. Intent does not matter.
02Social media activity
A like, a view, a follow, a comment on a mutual post. All logged, all reportable.
03Answering their message
If they reach out, replying is still your violation. Forward it, do not respond.
04Shared spaces
Class, gym, dining hall, party. Leave immediately and document that you left.
05Explaining or apologising
The single most common violation, and the one that also supplies an admission.
06Friends acting for you
Their posts defending you can be attributed to you as coordinated contact.
KEEP READING · THE TITLE IX SET
Where this page hands you off.
No page on this site is a dead end. These are the next questions people ask after this one, in the order they usually ask them.
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
FIG. - THE PRINCIPAL
THE LAWYER THE PRESS CALLS
You've seen the defense on Netflix. This is the firm behind it.

Todd A. Spodek is a second-generation trial lawyer whose defense of Anna Delvey became Netflix's Inventing Anna. He appears on Fox News and CNN as a legal analyst, authored "My Advice to Diddy" in The Spectator, and is quoted by the Associated Press when the biggest federal cases break. The record behind the profile: a complete acquittal in a $26M money-laundering trial, RICO charges carrying a 10-year minimum dismissed, and 6 months on a $12M Ponzi case.

Why this firm.

SPODEK LAW GROUP P.C. · EST. 1976
01
Second generation, since 1976

Thousands of clients across five decades. We have dealt with your issue before.

02
Loyalty to only you

No allegiance to prosecutors or judges. The client is the only constituency.

03
Nationwide, fully online

A complete client portal - documents, invoices, communications - coast to coast.

04
Selective by design

We only take clients we can truly help - and every accepted case gets the whole bench.

THE FIRM FILM · 00:45 · WHO WE ARE
ALL APPEARANCES →
45 SECONDS INSIDE THE FIRM

See who fights for you before you ever call.

Who we are, how we work, and why clients nationwide trust us with their future - in under a minute.

The Spodek Law Group P.C. bench

The team on your case.

EVERY ACCEPTED CASE GETS THE WHOLE BENCH · 24/7
Meet the bench →
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER
Todd A. Spodek
The Netflix defense · Fox & CNN analyst
Ralph P. Franco, Jr.
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Ralph P. Franco, Jr.
Court appearances · case strategy
Alex Zhik
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Alex Zhik
Criminal defense · client strategy
Jeremy Feigenbaum, working the file
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Jeremy Feigenbaum
Motions · investigations
Claire Banks
ASSOCIATE
Claire Banks
Federal motions · S.D.N.Y. & E.D.N.Y.
Joseph Alter
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Joseph Alter
Trial practice · not guilty on all counts, 2025
RB
OF-COUNSEL
Rajesh Barua
Immigration · removal defense
CL
OF-COUNSEL
Chad Lewin
Los Angeles · 23+ years
50+ years combined
Second generation, since 1976. Selective by design - loyal to only you.
PUT THEM ON YOUR CASE →

How your case unfolds.

THE FULL PROCESS →
01 · TODAY
The consultation

Risk-free, in person or by phone. Ask anything, for as long as it takes. Strategy starts the same day.

02
Investigation & evidence

Witnesses, reports, footage, experts - building the record that pokes holes in theirs.

03
Motions, negotiation - or trial

Suppress, dismiss, negotiate from strength. And if trial is the advantage - we are unafraid.

★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"The best lawyer anyone could ask for. Todd changed our lives."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
FROM THE RECORD · S.D.N.Y. & BEYOND
Acquittal$26M money laundering
DismissedRICO - 10-year mandatory minimum
6 months$12M Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
RISK FREE · CONFIDENTIAL · 24/7

Get ahead of the case.

Answered within 24 hours, guaranteed. Some stories are better told out loud -

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02Free, confidential consultation - ask us anything, regardless of how long it takes. 03Strategy starts the same day - and you hold the senior partner's cell number.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL
24/7
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
01
02
03
04
05
EVERYTHING YOU SHARE IS PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE FROM THE FIRST WORD.