Attorney on call · 24/7 · Risk-free consultation
212 300 5196
SECTION J · QUESTIONS ANSWERED · J06

Do I have to attend the hearing?.

No. You cannot be compelled to attend or to answer questions. But the hearing happens without you, your advisor loses the opportunity to test the account against you, and the decision-maker proceeds on the record as it stands - which is usually the complainant’s.
ATTEND. DO NOT NECESSARILY TESTIFY
Those are separate decisions. Attending preserves cross-examination. Declining to answer questions protects a parallel criminal case. You can do both.
WHICH RULES GOVERN YOUR CASE The 2020 Title IX regulations. The 2024 rewrite was vacated and does not apply.
RULE TRACKER →
THE BRIEFING · ATTENDANCE AND TESTIMONY

Respondents facing a criminal investigation ask whether they can simply not turn up. They can, and it is almost never the right choice - because attendance and testimony are separable.

Nothing compels you.

An institution cannot require attendance at a hearing or answers to questions, and the presumption of non-responsibility formally survives non-participation. What it cannot do is stop the hearing. The panel proceeds on the record before it, which in a case where the respondent has not engaged is substantially the complainant’s account and the investigative report built around it.

What non-attendance actually costs.

Cross-examination. The single adversarial mechanism the rule provides operates through your advisor at the live hearing, and it is unavailable if the hearing is not engaged. That means the complainant’s account goes untested, inconsistencies are never put, and the documentary record you assembled is never used to confront anyone with it. That is a large price for a protection you can obtain another way.

The posture that works.

Attend with your advisor. Let the advisor conduct a full cross-examination. Where a criminal matter makes testimony dangerous, decline to answer questions once, courteously, and proceed. You lose nothing procedurally by that combination, and you keep the mechanism that tests the case against you.

And the written channel.

Argument is not testimony. The evidence response, the report response, and any closing submission are all analysis of an existing record - they create no new account of events and give a prosecutor nothing. For a respondent who is not testifying, those documents are where the defense actually gets made, and they should be longer and better than they would otherwise have been.

Why you should call us.

If you are scrolling through search results trying to find someone to defend you, your search is over. You have found Spodek Law Group P.C. - and we are not your average defense firm. We know a thing or two about defending the accused in campus cases - and in the criminal courts that run alongside them. Over 50 years of combined experience, some of the toughest cases in the country, and we have come out on top. We have seen it all, and we empathise with you. We understand how frightening this is, and we have a legal team who can fight and win.

Unlike other attorneys who care about their reputation with the administrators and the prosecutors, our only goal is getting you the best outcome. We owe loyalty to only you. Our lawyers listen to you, your fears, and your goals. We care about your story, and that is where the work begins - by understanding and listening to you.

On billing, we are transparent about our fees, and there are no surprises. Choosing a lawyer is a big deal and cost is a real issue, so we are committed to being your champion irrespective of your ability to pay. Our firm has a simple belief: lawyers should only take on clients whom they can truly help. Many firms are mills that take every case through the door. We do not.

Working with us starts with a risk-free consultation, in person or over the phone. You can ask us anything, for as long as it takes, and we encourage you to ask the tough questions. We are available 24/7, we practise coast to coast, and every client has direct access to a partner. Call 212 300 5196 - an attorney answers.

GENERAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE. YOUR SCHOOL’S POLICY AND YOUR FACTS DECIDE EVERYTHING - AND THE CONSULTATION IS FREE. Skip reading - just call →
WHAT HAPPENS EITHER WAY
Six points.
The distinction between presence and testimony is the whole answer.
POINT 01
No compulsion
The institution cannot force attendance or answers.
YOUR CHOICE
POINT 02
It proceeds regardless
Non-appearance is not a veto. The hearing runs and a determination issues.
NO PAUSE
POINT 03
Cross-examination is lost
Your advisor questions their witnesses only if the hearing is engaged.
THE REAL COST
POINT 04
Silence and inference
The presumption remains, but a panel hearing one account tends to accept it.
PRACTICAL
POINT 05
Attend without testifying
Your advisor conducts cross while you answer nothing. This is the usual posture.
THE ANSWER
POINT 06
The written route
Argument through submissions carries no Fifth Amendment cost.
SAFE
The carve-out cuts both ways. Since the exclusion provision was vacated, a party who declines cross-examination no longer has their statements excluded - which applies to you as much as to them. Your earlier statements remain in the file whether you appear or not.
THE POSTURE THAT WORKS
Four moves.
Participate through argument and cross-examination; withhold testimony where criminal exposure exists.
01Attend with your advisor
Presence preserves every mechanism the rule gives you.
02Cross-examine fully
Their account gets tested whether or not you answer questions.
03Decline questions if advised
State it once, courteously, and let the advisor continue.
04File a closing submission
Argument about the record, with no new account of events.
KEEP READING · THE TITLE IX SET
Where this page hands you off.
No page on this site is a dead end. These are the next questions people ask after this one, in the order they usually ask them.
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
FIG. - THE PRINCIPAL
THE LAWYER THE PRESS CALLS
You've seen the defense on Netflix. This is the firm behind it.

Todd A. Spodek is a second-generation trial lawyer whose defense of Anna Delvey became Netflix's Inventing Anna. He appears on Fox News and CNN as a legal analyst, authored "My Advice to Diddy" in The Spectator, and is quoted by the Associated Press when the biggest federal cases break. The record behind the profile: a complete acquittal in a $26M money-laundering trial, RICO charges carrying a 10-year minimum dismissed, and 6 months on a $12M Ponzi case.

Why this firm.

SPODEK LAW GROUP P.C. · EST. 1976
01
Second generation, since 1976

Thousands of clients across five decades. We have dealt with your issue before.

02
Loyalty to only you

No allegiance to prosecutors or judges. The client is the only constituency.

03
Nationwide, fully online

A complete client portal - documents, invoices, communications - coast to coast.

04
Selective by design

We only take clients we can truly help - and every accepted case gets the whole bench.

THE FIRM FILM · 00:45 · WHO WE ARE
ALL APPEARANCES →
45 SECONDS INSIDE THE FIRM

See who fights for you before you ever call.

Who we are, how we work, and why clients nationwide trust us with their future - in under a minute.

The Spodek Law Group P.C. bench

The team on your case.

EVERY ACCEPTED CASE GETS THE WHOLE BENCH · 24/7
Meet the bench →
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER
Todd A. Spodek
The Netflix defense · Fox & CNN analyst
Ralph P. Franco, Jr.
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Ralph P. Franco, Jr.
Court appearances · case strategy
Alex Zhik
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Alex Zhik
Criminal defense · client strategy
Jeremy Feigenbaum, working the file
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Jeremy Feigenbaum
Motions · investigations
Claire Banks
ASSOCIATE
Claire Banks
Federal motions · S.D.N.Y. & E.D.N.Y.
Joseph Alter
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Joseph Alter
Trial practice · not guilty on all counts, 2025
RB
OF-COUNSEL
Rajesh Barua
Immigration · removal defense
CL
OF-COUNSEL
Chad Lewin
Los Angeles · 23+ years
50+ years combined
Second generation, since 1976. Selective by design - loyal to only you.
PUT THEM ON YOUR CASE →

How your case unfolds.

THE FULL PROCESS →
01 · TODAY
The consultation

Risk-free, in person or by phone. Ask anything, for as long as it takes. Strategy starts the same day.

02
Investigation & evidence

Witnesses, reports, footage, experts - building the record that pokes holes in theirs.

03
Motions, negotiation - or trial

Suppress, dismiss, negotiate from strength. And if trial is the advantage - we are unafraid.

★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"The best lawyer anyone could ask for. Todd changed our lives."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
FROM THE RECORD · S.D.N.Y. & BEYOND
Acquittal$26M money laundering
DismissedRICO - 10-year mandatory minimum
6 months$12M Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
RISK FREE · CONFIDENTIAL · 24/7

Get ahead of the case.

Answered within 24 hours, guaranteed. Some stories are better told out loud -

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02Free, confidential consultation - ask us anything, regardless of how long it takes. 03Strategy starts the same day - and you hold the senior partner's cell number.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL
24/7
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
01
02
03
04
05
EVERYTHING YOU SHARE IS PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE FROM THE FIRST WORD.