Attorney on call · 24/7 · Risk-free consultation
212 300 5196
SECTION D · THE CRIMINAL OVERLAP · D09

When a campus allegation becomes a criminal charge.

Most campus complaints never become criminal cases. Some do - and the ones that do tend to share features: a police report filed early, a forensic examination, digital evidence, or a complainant who wants prosecution as well as a campus outcome. If that is your situation, the campus hearing is now the smaller of two problems.
WHAT CHANGES IMMEDIATELY
Every campus decision becomes a criminal-defense decision. The written statement, the interview, the hearing testimony - each is discoverable, and each will be read by a prosecutor deciding whether to charge.
WHICH RULES GOVERN YOUR CASE The 2020 Title IX regulations. The 2024 rewrite was vacated and does not apply.
RULE TRACKER →
THE BRIEFING · CRIMINAL CHARGES FROM A CAMPUS ALLEGATION

When a campus sexual misconduct allegation also generates a police report, the student faces two proceedings with radically different burdens. The campus case asks whether the conduct more likely than not violated policy. The criminal case asks whether the elements of an offense can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Both are real, and they interact.

The charging decision.

Prosecutors weigh a familiar set of considerations: the complainant’s willingness to participate, the availability of corroboration independent of either account, forensic findings, capacity evidence where incapacitation is alleged, and the timing of the initial report. Of everything on that list, only one item is created by the respondent - the statement given during the campus process, obtained later by subpoena. It is frequently the most useful evidence the prosecution has, and it is entirely avoidable.

What forensic evidence establishes, and what it does not.

A sexual assault forensic examination documents physical findings and collects samples. It can establish contact and identity. It very rarely establishes whether contact was consensual, which is the disputed issue in most campus cases. Reports are frequently over-read by everyone involved, and reading the actual document rather than a summary of it is standard work in these matters.

Capacity, and the behavioural record.

Where the allegation is incapacitation, the fight is behavioural rather than chemical. Intoxication and incapacitation are different states, and the evidence that separates them is what a person actually did in the relevant window - messages composed, rides ordered, doors unlocked, conversations held, decisions made. That record exists on devices and in platform logs, and it degrades quickly.

Why the two outcomes routinely diverge.

Students are expelled on facts a prosecutor declines to charge, and students are charged after being cleared on campus. Neither is a contradiction: the standards are separated by an enormous evidentiary gap, and the decision-makers are answering different questions. A declination letter does not end the campus matter, and a campus dismissal does not end the criminal exposure.

How we run the defense.

One team across both, sequenced deliberately. Preservation and forensic work start in week one, because device and platform evidence decays. The campus record is built narrowly and in writing, with the criminal exposure priced into every filing. We obtain the school’s file and the Clery materials, because they cut in both directions. And where a prosecutor is still deciding, we address that decision directly rather than waiting to be charged.

Why you should call us.

If you are scrolling through search results trying to find someone to defend you, your search is over. You have found Spodek Law Group P.C. - and we are not your average defense firm. We know a thing or two about defending the accused in campus cases - and in the criminal courts that run alongside them. Over 50 years of combined experience, some of the toughest cases in the country, and we have come out on top. We have seen it all, and we empathise with you. We understand how frightening this is, and we have a legal team who can fight and win.

Unlike other attorneys who care about their reputation with the administrators and the prosecutors, our only goal is getting you the best outcome. We owe loyalty to only you. Our lawyers listen to you, your fears, and your goals. We care about your story, and that is where the work begins - by understanding and listening to you.

On billing, we are transparent about our fees, and there are no surprises. Choosing a lawyer is a big deal and cost is a real issue, so we are committed to being your champion irrespective of your ability to pay. Our firm has a simple belief: lawyers should only take on clients whom they can truly help. Many firms are mills that take every case through the door. We do not.

Working with us starts with a risk-free consultation, in person or over the phone. You can ask us anything, for as long as it takes, and we encourage you to ask the tough questions. We are available 24/7, we practise coast to coast, and every client has direct access to a partner. Call 212 300 5196 - an attorney answers.

GENERAL INFORMATION, NOT LEGAL ADVICE. YOUR SCHOOL’S POLICY AND YOUR FACTS DECIDE EVERYTHING - AND THE CONSULTATION IS FREE. Skip reading - just call →
HOW CHARGING DECISIONS GET MADE
Six factors prosecutors actually weigh.
Understanding the decision helps you avoid feeding it. Nothing here is about guilt or innocence - it is about what a prosecutor believes can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
FACTOR 01
The complainant’s wishes
Prosecutors weigh willingness to participate heavily. It is not determinative, and it can change.
SIGNIFICANT
FACTOR 02
Corroboration
Messages, medical findings, witnesses to the surrounding hours, prompt outcry. Independent of either account.
DECISIVE
FACTOR 03
Your own statements
The campus interview and written response, obtained by subpoena. Frequently the strongest evidence available.
AVOIDABLE
FACTOR 04
Forensic evidence
A SANE examination documents findings; it rarely establishes consent or its absence on its own.
OFTEN NEUTRAL
FACTOR 05
Capacity evidence
Where incapacitation is alleged, behavioural evidence in the same window is what carries weight.
TWO-EDGED
FACTOR 06
Timing and outcry
Delay is not disqualifying, but it changes what evidence still exists to test either account.
CONTEXTUAL
Notice which factor is entirely within your control. Factor three. Everything else is the world as it is; your own statement is the one piece of evidence a prosecutor gets only because someone gave it to them.
WHAT THE DEFENSE IS BUILT FROM
Records, not accounts.
Criminal defense in these cases is documentary and forensic. The work below happens in parallel with the campus case and starts in week one.
SOURCE 01
The full message archive
Complete threads before, during, and after - not the flattering excerpts.
COMPLETE ONLY
SOURCE 02
Device forensics
Extraction reports, location data, app activity, photo metadata. Frequently the whole case.
TECHNICAL
SOURCE 03
Toxicology and timeline
Consumption evidence against the behavioural record in the same hours.
SCIENCE MATTERS
SOURCE 04
SANE examination materials
What the examination documents, what it does not, and what the report actually says.
READ IT CLOSELY
SOURCE 05
Campus records
Access logs, video, the Clery log entry, and the school’s own investigative file.
TWO-WAY STREET
SOURCE 06
Witnesses to the hours
Who saw the walk home, the elevator, the morning after. Named early, interviewed properly.
TIME-SENSITIVE
A campus finding is not a conviction, and a declination is not a dismissal. The standards differ so widely that both outcomes routinely coexist: expelled by the school and never charged, or charged and cleared on campus. Neither forum controls the other, which is why both need defending.
KEEP READING · THE TITLE IX SET
Where this page hands you off.
No page on this site is a dead end. These are the next questions people ask after this one, in the order they usually ask them.
Todd A. Spodek, Managing Partner
FIG. - THE PRINCIPAL
THE LAWYER THE PRESS CALLS
You've seen the defense on Netflix. This is the firm behind it.

Todd A. Spodek is a second-generation trial lawyer whose defense of Anna Delvey became Netflix's Inventing Anna. He appears on Fox News and CNN as a legal analyst, authored "My Advice to Diddy" in The Spectator, and is quoted by the Associated Press when the biggest federal cases break. The record behind the profile: a complete acquittal in a $26M money-laundering trial, RICO charges carrying a 10-year minimum dismissed, and 6 months on a $12M Ponzi case.

Why this firm.

SPODEK LAW GROUP P.C. · EST. 1976
01
Second generation, since 1976

Thousands of clients across five decades. We have dealt with your issue before.

02
Loyalty to only you

No allegiance to prosecutors or judges. The client is the only constituency.

03
Nationwide, fully online

A complete client portal - documents, invoices, communications - coast to coast.

04
Selective by design

We only take clients we can truly help - and every accepted case gets the whole bench.

THE FIRM FILM · 00:45 · WHO WE ARE
ALL APPEARANCES →
45 SECONDS INSIDE THE FIRM

See who fights for you before you ever call.

Who we are, how we work, and why clients nationwide trust us with their future - in under a minute.

The Spodek Law Group P.C. bench

The team on your case.

EVERY ACCEPTED CASE GETS THE WHOLE BENCH · 24/7
Meet the bench →
Todd A. Spodek
MANAGING PARTNER
Todd A. Spodek
The Netflix defense · Fox & CNN analyst
Ralph P. Franco, Jr.
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Ralph P. Franco, Jr.
Court appearances · case strategy
Alex Zhik
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Alex Zhik
Criminal defense · client strategy
Jeremy Feigenbaum, working the file
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Jeremy Feigenbaum
Motions · investigations
Claire Banks
ASSOCIATE
Claire Banks
Federal motions · S.D.N.Y. & E.D.N.Y.
Joseph Alter
ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY
Joseph Alter
Trial practice · not guilty on all counts, 2025
RB
OF-COUNSEL
Rajesh Barua
Immigration · removal defense
CL
OF-COUNSEL
Chad Lewin
Los Angeles · 23+ years
50+ years combined
Second generation, since 1976. Selective by design - loyal to only you.
PUT THEM ON YOUR CASE →

How your case unfolds.

THE FULL PROCESS →
01 · TODAY
The consultation

Risk-free, in person or by phone. Ask anything, for as long as it takes. Strategy starts the same day.

02
Investigation & evidence

Witnesses, reports, footage, experts - building the record that pokes holes in theirs.

03
Motions, negotiation - or trial

Suppress, dismiss, negotiate from strength. And if trial is the advantage - we are unafraid.

★★★★★VERIFIED CLIENT · FEDERAL CASE · 2022 · VIA GOOGLE REVIEWS
"The best lawyer anyone could ask for. Todd changed our lives."
1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS →
FROM THE RECORD · S.D.N.Y. & BEYOND
Acquittal$26M money laundering
DismissedRICO - 10-year mandatory minimum
6 months$12M Ponzi - prosecutors asked for years
RISK FREE · CONFIDENTIAL · 24/7

Get ahead of the case.

Answered within 24 hours, guaranteed. Some stories are better told out loud -

212 300 5196
AFTER YOU REACH OUT
01A person answers - not a service. Day or night. 02Free, confidential consultation - ask us anything, regardless of how long it takes. 03Strategy starts the same day - and you hold the senior partner's cell number.
★★★★★1,100+ FIVE-STAR GOOGLE REVIEWS
READ THEM →
INTAKE · PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL
24/7
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
01
02
03
04
05
EVERYTHING YOU SHARE IS PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE FROM THE FIRST WORD.