212-300-5196

Service & Results.

nyc criminal lawyers over 30 years of experienceWe Know How To Win Cases

Spodek Law Group handles tough cases
nationwide, that demand excellence.

Get Free Consultation

Faced 5+ Years in Prison

People Vs Joseph Amico

Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.

Faced 10+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Anna Sorokin

Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.

Faced 3+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Genevieve Sabourin

Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.

Faced Potential Charges

Ghislaine Maxwell Juror

Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.

Why Choose Us

Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.

Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.

We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.

Spodek
Law in the Media

View All

Meet Todd Spodek

WE PROVIDE WHITE GLOVE SERVICE TO CLIENTS
WHO WANT MORE FROM THEIR ATTORNEY

The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.

Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.

In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.

Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group

The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.

We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.

If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.

Civil Investigative Demand (CID) Lawyers

A Civil Investigative Demand (CID) is a powerful tool used by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to gather evidence in cases involving alleged violations of federal consumer protection laws. These demands typically come in the form of a subpoena issued to an individual or company, and are used to obtain documents and other information that may be relevant to an ongoing investigation.

CIDs are an important part of the FTC’s enforcement authority, as they allow the agency to quickly and efficiently gather evidence in cases that involve complex or sensitive issues. In many cases, CIDs are used to supplement other forms of investigative tools, such as witness interviews or data analysis, in order to provide a more complete picture of the facts surrounding a particular case.

The use of CIDs is not limited to the FTC, however. Other federal agencies, such as the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission, also have the authority to issue CIDs in order to gather evidence in their respective areas of jurisdiction.

When issuing a CID, the FTC typically specifies the types of documents and information that it is seeking, as well as the time frame in which the recipient is required to produce the requested materials. CIDs can be very broad in scope, and may require the recipient to provide a wide range of documents and information, including financial records, customer lists, marketing materials, and internal communications.

In some cases, the FTC may also use a CID to request that the recipient produce witness statements or participate in an on-the-record interview. These interviews are typically conducted under oath, and can provide valuable insights into the alleged misconduct at issue.

The FTC’s use of CIDs is governed by a number of legal requirements and limitations. For example, the agency must have a reasonable belief that the recipient has information that is relevant to an ongoing investigation in order to issue a CID. Additionally, the FTC must provide the recipient with a detailed explanation of the alleged misconduct at issue, as well as the specific legal authority under which the CID is being issued.

In addition to these requirements, the FTC must also consider the potential impact of a CID on the recipient’s rights and interests. For example, the agency may need to take into account the recipient’s privacy rights, as well as any potential burdens or costs associated with producing the requested materials.

The recipient of a CID has a number of rights and options available to them in response to the demand. For example, the recipient may challenge the CID on legal grounds, such as arguing that the FTC does not have the authority to issue the demand or that the recipient does not have the information that the FTC is seeking. In such cases, the recipient may file a motion to quash the CID, which would require the FTC to justify its demand in court.

Alternatively, the recipient may choose to comply with the CID and produce the requested materials within the specified time frame. In such cases, the recipient may also be able to negotiate the scope of the CID in order to minimize any potential burdens or costs associated with compliance.

Regardless of the approach that the recipient takes, it is important to remember that CIDs are a serious matter, and failure to comply with a CID can result in significant legal consequences. In some cases, the FTC may seek a court order requiring the recipient to comply with the CID, and failure to do so can result in fines or even imprisonment.

In order to appropriately respond to a CID (civil investigative demand), the following steps should be taken:

  1. Review the CID carefully and understand its scope and purpose.
  2. Identify any deadlines for responding to the CID and make sure to meet them.
  3. Gather all relevant documents and information that is requested in the CID.
  4. Consult with legal counsel to ensure that the response to the CID is accurate and compliant with all applicable laws and regulations.
  5. Prepare a written response to the CID, including all requested documents and information.
  6. Submit the response to the CID within the specified timeframe.
  7. Follow up with the issuing agency, as needed, to provide additional information or clarification.

Important Information About CID’s

  1. Federal Civil Investigative Demands (CID) are issued by federal agencies to gather information and evidence in connection with a potential violation of federal law.
  2. CIDs are typically issued to individuals or organizations, and may require the production of documents, the provision of testimony, or the conduct of physical inspections.
  3. The use of CIDs is authorized by various federal statutes, including the False Claims Act and the Consumer Financial Protection Act.
  4. CIDs are typically issued by the agency investigating the potential violation, and must be signed by a senior official within the agency.
  5. Recipients of CIDs have the right to challenge the demand in court if they believe it is improper or overbroad.
  6. CIDs are typically accompanied by a request for confidentiality, which means that the recipient is not allowed to disclose the existence of the demand to anyone except their attorney.
  7. CIDs are not search warrants, and recipients do not have to comply with them unless ordered to do so by a court.
  8. Failure to comply with a CID can result in fines, penalties, and even criminal sanctions.
  9. Recipients of CIDs should consult with an attorney as soon as possible to protect their rights and interests.
  10. Federal agencies are required to follow strict procedures when issuing CIDs, and any violation of these procedures may be grounds for challenging the demand in court.

If you receive a CID (criminal investigative division) notice, it is likely that you are under federal investigation for a potential crime. A CID is a division of a federal law enforcement agency, such as the FBI or the DEA, that is responsible for conducting investigations into criminal activities.

If you receive a CID notice, it is important to take it seriously and consult with a lawyer immediately. The CID may be requesting information or documents from you, or they may be requesting an interview. It is important to carefully review the notice and follow the instructions provided.

It is also important to remember that you have rights under the law and it is important to protect those rights during the investigation. You have the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. It is important to exercise these rights and to consult with a lawyer before providing any information or documents to the CID.

The Department of Justice wields a powerful weapon in their arsenal of legal enforcement tools – the Civil Investigative Demand, or CID. This administrative subpoena demands a specific set of information from its recipient and threatens criminal contempt if it is not met. Unlike other subpoenas, the issuance of a CID does not require the involvement of a federal district court, giving the DOJ a significant advantage in their investigations.

But make no mistake, receiving a CID is a daunting and intimidating experience. It is essential to respond effectively and efficiently in order to insulate oneself and one’s company from legal liability. This is where the defense lawyers at national law firm Spodek Law P.C., led by the experienced Todd Spodek, come into play. With a wealth of knowledge and experience in navigating the tricky legal waters of CIDs, they have helped numerous individuals and corporations effectively respond to these demands.

It’s important to note that not all federal law enforcement agencies have the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands. The DOJ, in particular, only has Congressional authority to do so in cases of alleged antitrust violations and violations of the False Claims Act. These antitrust cases deal with allegedly anti-competitive business behavior, such as bid rigging, price fixing, apportioning regions among competitors, product tying and collusion.

But when faced with the formidable force of the DOJ and a CID, it is essential to have a legal team with the expertise and experience to guide you through the process and protect your rights and interests. Don’t go it alone – trust the defense lawyers at Spodek Law to fight for you.

The False Claims Act is a powerful tool that the government uses to hold individuals and organizations accountable for defrauding government programs. It is violated whenever an improper claim for compensation is made against a source of government funding, and it covers a wide range of conduct, with a particular focus on healthcare fraud. Some examples of violations include:

Submitting false claims and overbilling Medicare or Medicaid for services offered, whether intentionally or accidentally. Self-referral strategies by doctors that violate the Stark Law or the Anti-Kickback Statute. Federal government contractor fraud.

If you or your company have received a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) from the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division or in connection with False Claims Act investigations, it is vital that you take action. Ignoring the CID will not make it go away, and will only lead to criminal charges for contempt of federal district court, in addition to the continued demands of the CID.

It is also critically important not to over-comply with the demands in the letter. Providing too much information or handing over documents that were not within the contemplation of the CID can lead to unnecessary legal exposure if the extraneous information turns out to be incriminating in some way.

Implement a Legal Hold to Preserve Documents

One of the worst things that you can do, whether on purpose or by accident, is to destroy information or files that are listed in the CID. This can lead to allegations of spoliation and obstruction of justice, as well as a strong presumption that the deleted documents would have been incriminating against you.

The problem is that, in many cases, documents listed in the CID are destroyed under the normal document retention policies of the company that received the demand letter.

By implementing a company-wide legal hold, you can delay an impending file purge and preserve the information for the DOJ.

Gather Documents to Satisfy the Demand Well Before the Deadline

Even if you are going to challenge the issuance of the CID, you still need to gather the documents listed in the demand. This is to avoid a terrible situation where you challenge the CID, lose, and find yourself with little time to gather the information, even though you still have the complete task ahead of you.

But assembling the disclosure package on the eve of the CID’s deadline is not good enough for a strong defense. You want to give yourself enough time to conduct a complete review of the information you are about to hand over to the largest law enforcement agency in the country. If you find something during this review that you do not want to disclose or that might raise suspicions at the DOJ, you have a couple of options:

Come up with a strong argument that it does not fall within the scope of the CID Find a reason to justify non-disclosure, such as the attorney-client privilege Disclose it, but with an explanation that hopefully heads off continued scrutiny

This review is a crucially important defensive step to take during a CID investigation. You need to give your defense team time to do it.

In conclusion, it is important to understand the significance of False Claims Act and the potential legal exposures that come with it. It is also vital to take immediate action, and defend yourself properly if a CID is received.

Civil Investigative Demand (CID) Lawyers

When it comes to navigating the tricky waters of a Civil Investigative Demand (CID), there are two key elements to keep in mind: the subpoena must fall within the jurisdiction of the issuing agency and it must be relevant and material to the investigation at hand. But what happens when these conditions are called into question? One potential solution is to file a motion to quash or limit the CID with the Department of Justice (DOJ).

It’s important to note that the DOJ is unlikely to agree with your claim that the CID is unjustified, but that doesn’t mean all hope is lost. A denied motion can be appealed to the court system, where a more thorough examination of the CID’s validity will take place. However, it’s important to understand that this is an uphill battle, as recent cases have shown that courts will only consider three factors: the authorization for the agency to investigate this type of case, the DOJ’s adherence to proper procedures in issuing the CID, and the relevance and materiality of the information requested.

Though the odds may be stacked against you, it’s still worth filing a motion to quash in order to protect your defense for the future. Failure to do so may result in a court ruling that you’ve waived your right to contest the validity of the CID. So, if you find yourself in the midst of a CID investigation and have concerns about the subpoena’s jurisdiction or relevance, don’t hesitate to take action and file that motion to quash. With a little bit of persistence and a solid defense, you may just be able to set aside that CID and move on with your life.

The Civil Investigative Demands (CIDs) wielded by the U.S. Department of Justice and other federal agencies are not to be taken lightly. These powerful investigative tools are used to gather evidence in support of civil charges, but if evidence of criminal culpability is uncovered, criminal charges become a very real possibility. If you have been served with a CID, it’s crucial to understand what you’re up against.

First and foremost, it’s important to note that a CID is a form of administrative subpoena. This means that federal agencies with the authority to issue CIDs can do so at their discretion, without seeking court approval. However, these agencies can also seek a federal judge’s help in enforcing a CID in the event of non-compliance. And make no mistake, non-compliance can lead to a finding of contempt and even a federal criminal charge under 18 U.S.C. Section 402.

It’s also important to know that several federal agencies have the authority to issue CIDs, including the U.S. Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau. So, upon receiving a CID, it’s crucial to identify the issuing agency, which should be clearly stated on the CID itself.

In light of the substantial risks involved with facing any federal law enforcement investigation, the receipt of a civil investigative demand should be taken very seriously. It’s important to understand the implications of a CID, and the steps involved in preparing a response. Failure to do so can lead to serious consequences.

Civil Investigative Demand (CID) Lawyers

Are you facing a daunting and overwhelming Civil Investigative Demand (CID) from a federal agency like the DOJ, FTC or CFPB? Don’t panic, instead take control of the situation and take the necessary steps to protect yourself and your business.

When it comes to CIDs, it’s crucial to not only identify the agency that issued the demand, but also to quickly begin efforts to understand the scope and nature of the investigation. The DOJ, FTC and CFPB are all powerful agencies that use CIDs to obtain evidence from witnesses, suspects, and targets in a wide range of federal offenses.

But just because you’ve received a CID doesn’t mean you’re necessarily at risk of facing charges. How can you determine whether you’re under scrutiny or simply a source of information? In some cases, your posture in the investigation may be apparent from the nature of the information sought by the CID. In others, you can simply ask – or, more appropriately, have your legal counsel ask for you.

To navigate this complex process, there are 7 critical steps you should take after receiving a CID from a federal agency:

  1. Institute a Legal Hold – This is a structured effort to preserve any communications, electronic files, and hardcopy documents that could potentially be responsive to the demand. Failure to preserve responsive records can be considered tantamount to destruction, and this can lead to serious allegations regardless of whether you are the focus of the pending investigation.
  2. Determine Whether You Must “Meet and Confer” – Depending on the agency that issued your CID, you may have an obligation or opportunity to “meet and confer” with agency personnel. If you do, a strict deadline will apply, and failure to meet and confer could result in the waiver of certain rights—including potentially the right to challenge the CID.
  3. Begin the Process of Collecting and Reviewing Responsive Documents – Due to the substantial burden that responding to a CID typically entails, upon receiving a CID, it is important to begin response efforts immediately. This begins with developing a systematic approach to collecting and reviewing all responsive documents.
  4. Assess the Risks and Benefits of Cooperation – It’s important to take a strategic approach when deciding whether to cooperate with a federal investigation. Consider the risks and benefits of cooperation, and how cooperation may affect your company’s reputation, legal exposure and bottom line.
  5. Communicate with the Agency – Maintaining open lines of communication with the agency can be beneficial in many ways. It can help you stay informed about the status of the investigation, and provide you with an opportunity to negotiate terms of cooperation or settlement.
  6. Retain Experienced Legal Counsel – It’s essential to have experienced legal counsel who can guide you through the CID process and protect your rights. Your legal counsel can also help you prepare a response that complies with the CID and protects your interests.
  7. Monitor and Update your Compliance Program – A robust compliance program can help you detect and prevent potential violations, and it can also be helpful in demonstrating to the agency that you take compliance seriously.

Don’t let a CID cripple your business, instead take the necessary steps to protect yourself and your business by following these critical steps. With the right approach, you can navigate this process and come out the other side with your reputation and bottom line intact.

Free Consultation

Testimonials

I was searching for a law firm with some power to help me deal with a warrant in New York . After 6 days I decided to go with Spodek Law Group. It helped that This law firm is well respected by not only the top law firms in New York , but the DA , Judge as well. I...

~Fonder Brandon

5 Stars
It was my good fortune to retain Spodek Law Group for representation for my legal needs. From the beginning, communication was prompt and thorough. Todd, Kenneth and Alex were the first people I worked with and they all made me, and my company Qumana skincare feel comfortable and confident that the team was going to work hard for me. Everything...

~A G

5 Stars
After meeting with several law firms, I chose the Spodek Law Group not only for their professionalism and experience, but for the personal attention given to me right from the initial consultation. It is important to recognize how crucial having the right legal team is when faced with potentially life altering events that impact families and the lives of loved...

~George Cherubini

Spodek Law Group

White Glove Service

We Provide Superior Service, Excellent Results, At A Level Superior To Other Criminal Defense Law Firms. Regardless Of Where Your Case Is, Nationwide, We Can Help You.
View More

Request Free Consultation

Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.

NYC

85 Broad St 30th Floor, New York, NY 10004

212-300-5196

get directions

Los Angeles

611 S Catalina St Suite 222, Los Angeles, CA 90005

212-300-5196

get directions

QUEENS

35-37 36th St, 2nd Floor Astoria, NY 11106

212-300-5196

get directions

BROOKLYN

195 Montague St., 14th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201

212-300-5196

get directions
Call Now!