Blog
NYC Sex Offense Deportation Defense Attorney
NYPD arrests for sex offenses trigger automatic immigration consequences through the FBI’s Next Generation Identification system. Most criminal defense lawyers won’t mention this until it’s too late. Non-citizens are getting deported for dismissed cases, false accusations, crimes they were never convicted of. Fingerprints enter a federal database that connects to ICE.
Booking at any NYPD precinct, whether it’s in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, or Staten Island, uploads biometric data. Not just locally – USCIS, ICE, and every immigration enforcement agency gets access.
ICE knows everything within roughly three days.
Immigration law and New York criminal law define sex offenses differently. Under INA Section 237, some sex crimes are “aggravated felonies” even when New York calls them misdemeanors. Sexual abuse of a minor can include consensual activity between a nineteen and seventeen year old. Pleas to non-sexual assault charges don’t help – immigration judges review original arrest charges. Detention centers fill with people who never saw this coming. New York immigration courts order removal for decade-old convictions. Routine traffic stops lead to fingerprint checks, old sealed convictions surface. Removal proceedings start. Criminal sexual act third degree – Class E felony. Probation seemed like a good outcome. But immigration law makes it an aggravated felony. No relief available. Mandatory detention and deportation.
Making bail doesn’t mean freedom when ICE lodges detainers. These detainers once required convictions. Now arrests trigger them. Transfer to immigration custody happens at Rikers Island, or any county jail. New York City’s detainer discretion laws stop at federal jurisdiction.
Non-citizen defense requires avoiding immigration consequences, not just criminal ones. This means trial instead of pleas. Specific charge negotiations. New York Penal Law creates immigration traps. Forcible touching (Section 130.52) triggers moral turpitude. Harassment second degree (240.26) doesn’t, despite similar facts.
Evidence rules: Criminal court vs immigration court.
Criminal courts suppress illegally obtained evidence. Immigration courts bring it back. Different rules apply. Police reports, dismissed charges, arrests without prosecution all become evidence. Federal courts confirm removal needs only “clear and convincing evidence,” not proof beyond reasonable doubt. Burden shifts completely for relief eligibility. Immigrants prove they deserve to stay.
Information sharing happens fast between criminal and immigration systems. Psychological evaluations meant for sentencing prove dangerousness later. Treatment admissions exceed charged conduct. Criminal lawyers’ helpful letters about clients’ backgrounds establish deportability. They mention home countries, family abroad. ICE uses these as deportation blueprints. New York’s youthful offender statute seems protective – federal immigration law ignores it. Our criminal attorneys have seen this happen repeatedly.
Delay tactics allow immigration filing time. Plea language avoids federal sex offense definitions. Assault charges might carry better immigration outcomes than sex offenses, despite sounding worse. Strategic defenses look different when freedom and residence are both at stake.
Timing. Timing. Timing.
Seven years of permanent residency changes options. Visa holders face different strategies than green card holders. Each status creates unique problems. Same conviction, different consequences. New York and federal age definitions conflict. Our consent age: 17. Federal statutes vary between 16 and 18. Statutory rape here might not qualify as sexual abuse federally. Or vice versa. Reading between state codes, federal definitions, circuit splits.
ICE enforcement priorities target sex offenses regardless of context. Family ties, decades of residence, tax payment, community involvement – certain convictions override everything. Prosecutorial discretion that existed in previous administrations has vanished.
Seal motions excluding federal access. Pleas avoiding ages or specific acts. Evidence working in both forums. Immigration applications before criminal resolution – U visas, asylum, marriage petitions. Criminal court mistakes cause permanent exile. What looks like favorable probation deals lead to immigration detention, then deportation. The systems interconnect. Arrests trigger deportation machinery. Detention fills federal contractors’ facilities. Precision in legal strategy becomes essential.
Our law firm handles these criminal-immigration intersections with attorneys experienced in both fields. Spodek Law Group has locations throughout New York, and we’re accessible when these situations arise. Understanding both systems allows coordinated defense strategies. Nationwide, we’ve handled complex federal cases where criminal charges threaten immigration status.
Non-citizens facing sex charges need immediate coordination between criminal and immigration counsel. Wrong choices lead to removal. Defense strategies must consider both forums from the start. Every decision impacts both cases. Contact our attorneys before making statements, before accepting deals, before time-sensitive immigration options expire.