Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 15th October 2023, 01:47 pm
If you’re facing criminal charges in New York, you may be wondering about 440.47 motions and how they can potentially help your case. These motions can be complicated, but with some background knowledge, you’ll be better equipped to understand the process. This article provides an in-depth look at 440.47 motions, from what they are to how they work in real-life cases. I’ll walk through the basics in an easy-to-understand way, so you can feel empowered when navigating the legal system.
Section 440.47 of New York’s Criminal Procedure Law allows people convicted of crimes to request that the court re-sentence them if they were victims of domestic violence at the time of the offense. Essentially, 440.47 motions assert that procedural errors, new evidence, misconduct, or other factors undermine the fundamental legitimacy of the original sentence.
The law recognizes that domestic violence can play a significant role in criminal behavior. If an abuse victim was convicted without consideration of the domestic violence they endured, 440.47 provides an avenue to re-evaluate the case through that lens.
These motions can be filed by someone convicted of any crime except a Class A felony. There are no rigid time limitations, but the law does say motions should be made with “due diligence.” This generally means filing relatively soon after the conviction, rather than waiting many years.
To succeed on a 440.47 motion, the convicted person must show:
Domestic violence includes physical, sexual, or psychological abuse committed by a family member or intimate partner. The convicted person will need evidence like medical records, court documents, witness statements, or expert testimony to prove the domestic violence.
Judges have significant discretion in resentencing decisions under 440.47. They can consider any facts or circumstances relevant to imposing a new sentence. Some factors may include:
Hearings are typically held where both sides can present evidence and arguments about resentencing. The rules of evidence are relaxed at these hearings – hearsay can be considered, for example. After the hearing, the judge will decide whether the defendant’s sentence should be modified and if so, what the new sentence should be.
440.47 motions can result in different types of relief:
The possibilities depend on the specifics of each case. The judge is not required to grant any relief at all if the evidence is unpersuasive.
Looking at how these motions have played out in real cases can provide helpful examples:
These cases illustrate the importance of providing adequate supporting evidence when filing the motion. Judges will closely scrutinize the proof of domestic violence and its causal link to the crime.
440.47 motions are a powerful legal tool for New York defendants affected by domestic violence. By understanding the legal standards, gathering solid evidence, and presenting a compelling case, victims of abuse can potentially achieve a more just outcome. While the law presents challenges, with good legal guidance, 440.47 motions remain an option worth exploring.
If you or a loved one are considering a 440.47 motion, be sure to consult closely with an experienced criminal defense attorney. An lawyer can help assess the case facts, locate evidence of domestic violence, and craft persuasive arguments to the court. Although not easy to win, 440.47 motions open a door for possible redemption that should not be overlooked.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.