Criminal Defense Lawyers

Healthcare Provider Fraud Investigation

Healthcare Provider Fraud Investigation: What Happens When FBI Contacts You

Two FBI agents just showed up at your medical practice asking questions about you’re billing. Or maybe it’s a grand jury subpoena for patient records sitting on you’re desk right now. Either way, your now part of the largest federal healthcare fraud crackdown in US history – 324 providers arrested in June 2025 alone, with over $14.6 billion in alleged fraud. You built a career helping patients. Now your facing federal charges that could end everything – your practice, your medical license, you’re freedom. This article explains what’s happening right now, what the FBI already knows before they contacted you, what decisions you face in the next 24-72 hours, and what actually happens to healthcare providers in federal fraud investigations based on real 2025 case data.

You’ve Been Under Investigation for 18 Months – Here’s What FBI Already Knows

Look, here’s the thing—when FBI agents show up at your office or you recieve a federal subpoena, your first instinct is to explain everything. Clear this up. Show them it was just a billing mistake, a software error, something your staff did without you’re knowledge. That instinct will destroy your defense.

By the time the FBI contacts you, they’ve been investigating for 18-36 months on average. This ain’t a preliminary inquiry. They already know everything. FBI agents has interviewed your medical assistants, your front desk staff, you’re billing clerks. They’ve subpoenaed your Medicare billing records going back 3-5 years. They’ve identified statistical anomalies in your billing patterns – procedures billed more frequently then other providers in you’re specialty, upcoding patterns, services billed on dates when office was closed.

Here’s what actually happened before FBI knocked on you’re door: A CMS audit flagged your practice 12-18 months ago. The audit got refered to HHS-OIG (Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General). HHS-OIG spent 6-9 months reviewing records, interviewing patients, analyzing you’re billing data. Then they made a criminal referral to the DOJ Health Care Fraud Unit. FBI opened an investigation. Federal prosecutors convened a grand jury. Subpoenas went out to insurance companies, pharmaceutical distributors, you’re bank.

You had no idea any of this was happening.

And that’s exactly how they wanted it.

The silent investigation period exists so you can’t destroy evidence, coach employees, or change billing practices to cover tracks. By the time FBI contacts you, they’ve already built 90% of their case. They’re not looking for information – their looking for admissions. Every word you say without a lawyer present becomes evidence prosecutors will use to convict you.

Real talk: If you just got contacted by FBI and you think you can “explain this away,” you don’t understand what your facing. The federal goverment doesn’t send agents to healthcare providers for “misunderstandings.” They send agents when they beleive they have evidence of federal crimes under 18 USC § 1347 (Health Care Fraud statute), which carries up to 10 years in prison per violation.

Do NOT talk to FBI without a criminal defense lawyer present. Anything you say will be used against you. Silence is not an admission of guilt – its the smartest decision you can make right now.

Who’s Already Talking to FBI (It’s Your Billing Staff)

You think the investigation started with a patient complaint or a random audit. Your wrong. In 40-50% of healthcare fraud cases, the investigation begins when a billing manager or medical coder contacts FBI directly – before ever filing a formal whistleblower lawsuit. Why? Because early cooperators get bigger rewards.

Under the False Claims Act (31 USC § 3729), whistleblowers who bring cases to goverment’s attention recieve 15-30% of whatever the goverment recovers. For a $2 million fraud case, that’s $300,000-$600,000 for the person who turns you in. And here’s what nobody tells you: employees who cooperate with FBI before filing a formal qui tam lawsuit get preference. They get their cases processed faster. They get better legal support from DOJ. They’re treated as witnesses, not opportunistic informants.

Your billing staff knows this.

The ones who left recently? They definately know this.

Think about who has access to the information FBI needs: billing clerks who process claims, medical coders who assign diagnosis codes, office managers who handle insurance verification, nurses who document procedures. These are the people federal investigators interview first – often before you even know your under investigation. And here’s the problem: they’re not trying to lie or hurt you. Their just scared. When FBI shows up asking questions about billing practices, most employees tell everything they know because they think cooperation will protect them.

FBI agents doesn’t need you to confess. They need your employees to explain the billing system, identify who made decisions about coding, describe any pressure to upcode or bill for services not provided. Your medical assistant who mentioned to FBI that “the doctor told us to always use the higher-level code when in doubt”? That statement just became the foundation of a federal indictment.

I mean, think about it—your facing 10-20 years in federal prison based off statements your own staff gave to FBI agents during “informal interviews” they thought were routine. And you had no idea it was happening.

Warning signs your employees may already be cooperating: sudden resignation from billing/coding position, former employee filed unemployment or discrimination claim, staff member asked unusual questions about billing practices or seemed nervous about documentation, someone requested copies of policies or billing guidelines before leaving. Any of these red flags mean FBI may already have insider testimony.

Can you talk to current employees about the investigation? Technically yes, but this is a minefield. If prosecutors beleive you’re trying to influence testimony or coordinate stories, they’ll add obstruction of justice charges. You need a lawyer to advise on employee communications – because the line between “legitimate business discussions” and “witness tampering” is razor-thin in federal investigations.

Bottom line: Your billing staff may be cooperating with FBI right now. Former employees who left in the past 12-18 months? Assume their talking. The investigation didn’t start when FBI contacted you. It started when someone inside you’re practice decided cooperating was safer then staying silent.

What Type of Fraud Your Facing (And Why It Matters)

Not all healthcare fraud cases is the same. The charges you face, the sentencing exposure, and you’re defense strategy depends entirely on what type of fraud prosecutors are alleging. Medicare Advantage upcoding, telemedicine perscriptions, compound pharmacy kickbacks, and DME (durable medical equipment) schemes are prosecuted completely different – with vastly different penalties.

Medicare Advantage Upcoding = Automatic $1M+ Threshold

If your a Medicare Advantage provider who adjusted diagnosis codes for “better documentation” or “accurate risk adjustment,” you may unknowingly have crossed the $1 million fraud threshold that triggers 10+ year mandatory sentencing guidelines. Here’s why: Medicare Advantage plans get paid monthly capitation amounts based off patient risk scores. Each diagnosis code you add increases the risk score, which increases the monthly payment. Bill 50 patients at wrong risk scores, and you’ve generated $1M+ in 6 months – even if individual monthly payments were just $200-300 higher then they should of been.

Federal sentencing guidelines calculate loss amount based on total intended loss, not what you actually recieved. This means prosecutors add up all the inflated capitation payments across all patients across all months. The math gets to $1 million faster then you think, and that $1M threshold triggers USSG § 2B1.1 sentencing enhancements that add 10+ years.

Compound Pharmacy Kickback Schemes

Compound pharmacies offer doctors “consulting fees” or “speaker programs” – $500-1,000 per perscription for custom compound medications. Patient’s insurance pays $15,000-25,000 per month for the compound cream or pain gel. Everyone thinks its legal because patient actually recieved medication and it was medically neccessary.

Wrong.

The consulting fee is a kickback under the Anti-Kickback Statute (42 USC § 1320a-7b), irregardless of medical necessity. Federal law prohibits anything of value given in exchange for referrals of federal healthcare program beneficiaries. The compound pharmacy paying you $500 per perscription is inducing you to prescribe their product over competitors. That’s a federal crime – even if the perscription was medically appropriate.

Defense lawyers try to argue “safe harbor” exceptions, but compound pharmacy consulting arrangements almost never qualify. The payments are based on volume (number of perscriptions), not fair market value of actual consulting work performed. If you can’t show contemporaneous documentation of consulting hours, written contract with specific deliverables, and payments that match hourly rate regardless of perscription volume, you don’t have a safe harbor defense.

DME Kickbacks and “Free” Medical Samples

Durable medical equipment suppliers offer “free samples” to doctors, or pay for your staff’s conference travel, or sponsor “educational grants” for your practice. Pharmaceutical companies have sales reps who bring lunch for your office and leave free medication samples. Everyone in healthcare knows this is standard practice.

Here’s what nobody tells you: free samples from companies whose products you prescribe may be Anti-Kickback violations. If you prescribe a pharmaceutical company’s drugs to Medicare/Medicaid patients, and that same company gives you anything of value (free samples, meals, speaker fees, conference travel), prosecutors can charge that as a kickback scheme. The legal theory is that free samples induce you to prescribe that company’s products instead of competitors.

Recent enforcement actions based off this theory has increased dramatically. Prosecutors are going back 3-5 years, identifying doctors who recieved free samples or speaker fees, then analyzing prescribing patterns to Medicare/Medicaid patients. If you prescribed significantly more of that company’s products compared to other doctors in you’re specialty, that’s evidence the “free” samples influenced you’re prescribing decisions – which makes them illegal kickbacks.

This feels like entrapment. Pharmaceutical companies actively encouraged these arrangements. Sales reps told you it was legal. But federal law holds individual providers criminally liable, not just the companies. The pharma company gets a corporate fine.

You get a federal indictment.

Which Federal Office Contacts You Tells You What Stage Your In

CMS audit letter = early stage, civil resolution still possible. HHS-OIG letter requesting documents = referral stage, civil settlement window closing. FBI agents at you’re door = charging decision imminent, criminal prosecution likely. Understanding which agency is involved tells you how much time you have and what options remain. This is critical – because the 90-day window between CMS audit and FBI involvement is your last chance to settle civilly and avoid criminal charges entirely.

Telemedicine Providers – Your Facing Drug Trafficking Charges, Not Fraud

If you prescribed Adderall, Xanax, opioids, or other controlled substances through telemedicine platforms like Cerebral, Done, Hims, or similar services, you need to understand something right now.

Your not being charged with healthcare fraud. Your being charged with federal drug trafficking.

This is worse. So much worse then billing fraud.

Under 21 USC § 841, distributing Schedule II controlled substances (Adderall, oxycodone, fentanyl) without a valid patient relationship carries a 20-year mandatory minimum sentence. Not healthcare fraud’s 10-year maximum. A 20-year mandatory minimum that judges cannot reduce irregardless of circumstances.

Here’s what happened: You prescribed Adderall for ADHD patients through telemedicine platform. (Totally legitimate medical purpose, right?) You did 15-20 minute video consultations. Patient described ADHD symptoms. You wrote perscription based off clinical judgment. Patient got medication. Everyone was happy.

Then DEA changed the rules.

Post-pandemic telemedicine exceptions expired. DEA issued new regulations requiring in-person examination for controlled substence perscriptions, with very limited exceptions. Those 15-minute video calls you did? They don’t satisfy the “valid patient relationship” requirement under current DEA regulations. And prosecutors are now charging telemedicine providers who prescribed controlled substances based on video-only consultations with the same statute used to prosecute street-level drug dealers.

Your facing career-ending, family-destroying, life-as-you-know-it-is-over charges. Not “improper billing.” Federal drug distribution charges that carry the same penalties as selling heroin on street corners.

The emotional weight of this is crushing—I mean, your a licensed physician who went to medical school, did residency, built a practice helping patients with legitimate medical conditions. You prescribed FDA-approved medications for diagnosed conditions. And now federal prosecutors are treating you like a drug kingpin because you used telemedicine instead of in-person visits.

Let me be clear: DOJ doesn’t care that you thought you was following medical standards. They don’t care that the telemedicine platform’s lawyers said it was legal. They definately don’t care that you genuinely beleived you were helping ADHD patients who couldn’t access care otherwise. Prosecutors are charging telemedicine providers with drug trafficking, and conviction rates are high.

Look, the sentencing exposure on this is insane. Federal sentencing guidelines for drug trafficking are based off drug quantity, not dollar amounts like fraud cases. Each Adderall perscription is 30-90 pills. Each pill has a “weight” for sentencing purposes. If you prescribed 1,000 perscriptions over 18 months (totally normal for a telemedicine provider), that could be calculated as distributing 50,000+ pills – which triggers sentencing enhancements that add years.

And here’s the part that will wreck you: intended loss calculations work different in drug cases. Prosecutors don’t just count perscriptions you actually wrote. They count perscriptions you COULD OF written based on patient volume. If you saw 200 patients per month through the telemedicine platform, and prosecutors beleive you prescribed without valid patient relationships, they’ll calculate sentencing exposure based on 200 patients × 12 months × average perscriptions per patient. The math gets to thousands of perscriptions fast, and each one is a seperate count of drug distribution.

Real talk: telemedicine providers are getting 10-20 year sentences right now. Not probation. Not home confinement. Actual federal prison time in the double digits. For prescribing Adderall to adults who said they had ADHD symptoms.

You prescribed medications you beleived were medically appropriate. You followed what you thought were proper telemedicine procedures. Your facing 20 years irregardless. The disconnect between what you did and what your being charged with is staggering—and that’s exactly why you need a criminal defense lawyer who understands federal drug trafficking charges, not just healthcare fraud.

This ain’t a billing dispute.

Its a federal drug case with mandatory minimum sentences that will take you away from you’re family for decades. The stakes couldn’t be higher.

Why Your Sentencing Exposure Is 10x What You Think

You just got discovery from prosecutors. The indictment says “healthcare fraud scheme involving aproximately $8 million in false claims.” You panic. Eight million dollars? You never recieved anywhere close to that. Your practice collected maybe $400,000 total from the claims prosecutors are calling fraudulent. How can they say $8 million?

Here’s what they don’t explain until your lawyer asks: federal sentencing guidlines calculate loss amount based on intended loss, not actual loss. Intended loss = the total amount you billed, regardless of what insurance companies actually paid.

You billed Medicare $8 million over 3 years for services prosecutors say were medically unneccessary or improperly coded. Medicare only paid $400,000 of those claims – the rest were denied or adjusted. Under federal sentencing guidelines, your still responsible for the full $8 million you attempted to obtain, even though you only actually recieved $400,000.

This seems insane. How can they punish you for money you never got? But that’s exactly how USSG § 2B1.1 works. The sentencing table adds years based on loss amount thresholds. $400,000 loss = 6-8 years under guidelines. $8 million loss = 12-15 years. Same conduct. Different calculation methodology. Ten extra years in federal prison.

Prosecutors use this calculation because it prevents defendants from arguing “I only got caught for a small portion of my fraud scheme.” The guidelines punish the entire scope of fraudulent activity, not just what succeeded. But the practical effect is that sentencing exposure seems disproportionate to money actually recieved, which makes plea negotiations harder because providers can’t understand why prosecutors are demanding 10+ years for what they see as a $400,000 billing error.

Your lawyer needs to challenge loss calculation methodology. This is the single most important part of your defense after determining guilt/innocence. Even if you plead guilty or get convicted at trial, fighting over loss amount calculation can reduce you’re sentence by 5-10 years. Arguments include: offsetting legitimate claims against fraudulent ones, excluding claims that were denied (never actually defrauded goverment), calculating actual loss to Medicare rather then amount billed, showing goverment would of paid for services anyway under different billing codes.

Different judges in different federal districts calculates loss amounts different ways. Some courts apply strict “amount billed” approach. Others allow more nuanced actual-loss calculations. Where you’re case is prosecuted matters as much as what you did.

Bottom line: when prosecutors say your facing charges for “$8 million fraud,” that number is based off billing records, not bank deposits. The sentencing exposure is 10x higher then you think because the calculation includes every claim you submitted, not just ones that got paid. Understanding this gap is critical for evaluating plea offers and deciding whether to go to trial.

The Whistleblower Lawsuit You Don’t Know About

You just found out there’s a civil lawsuit filed against you under the False Claims Act. A qui tam case (which is Latin for “your screwed”) filed by a former employee – probably that billing manager who quit 18 months ago. The lawsuit was filed “under seal,” meaning you never knew it existed until now. And here’s what your about to learn: this civil lawsuit has been feeding the FBI’s criminal investigation the entire time.

Here’s how parallel civil-criminal procedings work: Former employee files qui tam whistleblower lawsuit alleging False Claims Act violations (fraudulent Medicare billing). The lawsuit is filed under seal, meaning its hidden from you while DOJ investigates. During the seal period (typically 60 days, but often extended for 12-24 months), FBI and federal prosecutors use the whistleblower’s evidence to build criminal case. The civil lawsuit and criminal investigation proceed simultaneously, with discovery in the civil case feeding evidence to criminal prosecutors.

You can’t stop this.

Even if you assert you’re Fifth Amendment rights and refuse to testify in the civil case (which you absolutely should), your employees can still be deposed. Their depositions becomes roadmaps for criminal prosecution. Your billing records produced in civil discovery go straight to federal prosecutors. Insurance company records subpoenaed in the civil case get shared with FBI.

The parallel proceding problem is that you need completely different strategies for civil and criminal defense, but they’re happening at the same time and effecting each other. In the civil case, you want to settle quickly to minimize damages. In the criminal case, any settlement is an admission that strengthens prosecution’s case. In civil discovery, you have to produce documents. Those documents become criminal evidence. Your caught between two legal systems that are supposed to be seperate but are actually working together to destroy you.

Your employees who still work for you are the biggest vulnerability. They can be deposed in the civil case, and their testimony goes straight to criminal prosecutors. They can’t assert Fifth Amendment (that’s your right, not their’s). If they testify inconsistently – say one thing in civil depostion, different thing to FBI – prosecutors charge them with perjury or false statements, then offer immunity in exchange for cooperation against you.

The whistleblower who filed the qui tam lawsuit gets 15-25% of whatever goverment recovers in the civil case, plus a portion of any criminal fines or restitution. For a $5 million settlement, that’s $750,000-1.25 million for the person who turned you in. This creates huge financial incentives for employees to exaggerate or even fabricate claims – and federal law provides very limited ability to challenge whistleblower credibility until much later in the process.

You need coordinated civil and criminal defense. Not just one lawyer handling both – you need a civil defense attorney who understands criminal implications of every discovery response, and a criminal defense lawyer who understands how civil lawsuit will impact plea negotiations. These lawyers need to communicate constantly, because decisions in one case directly affects the other.

Don’t underestimate the qui tam lawsuit just because its “only” civil. That civil case is the blueprint for you’re criminal prosecution.

What You Need to Do Right Now

Your facing federal healthcare fraud charges – or you will be soon based off the investigation that’s been happening without you’re knowledge. The decisions you make in the next 24-72 hours will determine whether you get 3 years or 15 years, whether you keep your medical license or lose it forever, whether you’re family survives this financially or loses everything.

Call a federal criminal defense attorney. Right now. Not tommorow. Not next week. Today.

Every day you wait is another day FBI is interviewing employees, reviewing records, building a stronger case. The cooperation window closes fast. Former employees are already talking. Your billing staff may be negotiating whistleblower rewards right now.

Don’t talk to FBI without a lawyer present. Don’t try to “clear this up” on you’re own. Don’t assume this is a misunderstanding that will go away if you just explain the billing software error or the staff mistake. Federal prosecutors don’t investigate healthcare providers for misunderstandings. They investigate when they beleive they have evidence of federal crimes.

Look, I know your terrified. Your career is on the line. You’re freedom is at stake. Your family is depending on you. But silence is not an admission of guilt – its the smartest tactical decision you can make right now. Let your lawyer do the talking. Let your lawyer evaluate what prosecutors actually have, what charges your really facing, what cooperation options exist, what the realistic sentencing exposure is.

The 324 providers arrested in the 2025 National Healthcare Fraud Takedown – some of them will get probation. Some will get 2-3 years. Some will get 15-20 years. The difference? They had lawyers who understood federal healthcare fraud prosecutions, who knew how to challenge loss calculations, who negotiated cooperation agreements before indictment, who fought to keep their clients out of the highest sentencing guidelines.

Your not facing this alone irregardless of what it feels like right now. Call a lawyer. Get representation. Understand what your actually facing. And give yourself the best chance at the best possible outcome in what is definitly the worst situation of you’re professional life.

Don’t wait.

Your facing this alone otherwise.