Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 28th July 2023, 07:18 pm
If you’ve been following the news these days then you’re aware that the new administration in Washington, D.C. has promised to prosecute and eliminate fraud in federal programs. One of these “entitlement” programs currently being scrutinized is the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as the “food stamp” program.
Is snap In Trouble?
The program now known as snap has existed in one form or another since the late 1930s. Its purpose is to provide financial assistance to individuals and families unable to purchase food. This program has not been without controversies over its lifespan. Among the allegations surrounding it is that it is easy to defraud. While SNAP remains a fairly healthy program and the number of true fraud cases are in decline, it’s not difficult to fall afoul of SNAP regulations. If you need help with federal appeals, our federal appeals lawyers can assist with this as well.
SNAP is intended to provide a limited amount of goods to eligible households. Under the restrictions of this program, both program applicants and vendors who participate in it must adhere to certain requirements. If violations are proven in both cases, penalties include:
A SNAP recipient is considered guilty of fraud if he or she:
A vendor participating in the SNAP program is guilty of participating in SNAP fraud if he or she:
A study conducted in 2013 by the federal General Accounting Office (GAO) showed that true SNAP fraud was relatively rare, occurring with only four percent of program participants. That figure has continued to decline with stricter enforcement. The GAO’s study also showed that many of those charged with fraud weren’t hardened criminals, but individuals trying to “bend” SNAP’s stricter requirements. This “bending” included making purchases not allowed by SNAP (like alcohol or gasoline) or exchanging SNAP benefits for their cash equivalent.
Can You Be Caught In A SNAP Snare?
It’s difficult to feel sorry for individuals who find ways to defraud programs for the disadvantaged on purpose. But SNAP is a complex program with many restrictions. Some of these have changed or been amended over time, as well. Is it possible to accidentally commit fraudulent errors while participating in this program? There are several ways in which this can happen.
1. The recipient accidentally receives more benefit than they are entitled to.
The federal SNAP program is administered on a state level. But farming claims out doesn’t mean that accidents don’t happen. Adjustments are occasionally made to SNAP applications that result in larger benefits than originally anticipated. But these adjustments are (or should be) accompanied by documentation explaining any benefit adjustments.
If a recipient is aware that an error of this nature has been made and uses the benefits anyway, they are generally not penalized. However, the erring agency retains the right to collect what it calls “overages” from future payments until the overage is gone.
2. The recipient makes an “honest mistake” while applying for SNAP that results in more benefits then they are entitled to.
These are tedious, complicated forms to fill out. Accidents happen. Recipients may be expected to fill out amended forms when this occurs. If benefits have been issued and used before this error is caught, recipients should expect “overages” to be deducted.
3. While appealing a rejected SNAP application, the applicant begins receiving SNAP benefits.
If the recipient loses the appeal, he or she may be considered financially liable for any used SNAP benefits. It’s also possible that he or she may be charged “overage” for any benefits issued before a SNAP appeal is officially won.
Administering state agencies have some leeway with “unintentional” violations like these. Under certain conditions such as:
recipients often aren’t charged for outstanding amounts. However, if the administering agency determines that an applicant or recipient has intentionally violated the requirements of the SNAP program, the consequences are far more severe. Intentional SNAP violations are usually determined to have occurred when:
Because the consequences of a charged intentional SNAP violation are potentially far more serious than an unintentional one, legal consul is recommended in such cases.
The best way for both potential recipients and vendors to avoid problems with SNAP is to fully understand the program and how it works before committing to it. Neither party should agree to exchange benefits for money, or to sell or purchase items not permitted by the program. Both recipients and vendors should complete and report any paperwork issues promptly. Any changes that would affect program participation should be reported promptly as well. And both recipients and vendors should report any abuses of the SNAP program that they become aware of, and cooperate with authorities fully. And when SNAP legal trouble can’t be avoided, lawyers experienced in dealing with this program can be invaluable. Such attorneys can:
SNAP has helped millions of people to survive hard times, and it’s a program well worth preserving. Making sure that its participants adhere to its rules is one sure way to help to preserve it for years to come.
In a world where the new administration in Washington, D.C. pledges to eliminate fraud in federal programs, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as the “food stamp” program, is under intense scrutiny. This essential program, providing much-needed financial assistance to individuals and families struggling to purchase food, may face significant changes due to allegations of fraud.
Since its inception in the late 1930s, SNAP has navigated waves of controversy and reform. The primary issue regarding SNAP is its vulnerability to fraud with some asserting that it’s too easy for recipients and vendors to exploit the system.
To participate in SNAP, both applicants and vendors must adhere to specific requirements. For example, if they violate these requirements, penalties such as permanent disqualification from the program, jail terms, and fines can result.
SNAP fraud occurs when recipients or vendors deceive the program intentionally. A recipient might lie on their application forms, exchange their SNAP benefits for cash, or purchase items not allowed by the program. On the other hand, a vendor can perpetrate fraud by exchanging cash for SNAP benefits, accepting SNAP benefits for prohibited items, or falsifying paperwork.
However, it’s important to note that according to a 2013 study by the federal General Accounting Office (GAO), true SNAP fraud is relatively rare (occurring in only 4% of cases) and has continued to decline due to stricter enforcement.
While it’s challenging to sympathize with people who intentionally defraud programs like SNAP, it’s crucial to ask ourselves whether accidental fraud is possible. Considering the complexity of the program, its restrictions, and the amendments taking place over time, the answer is yes.
There are several ways in which someone may unintentionally commit SNAP fraud:
1. Receiving more benefits than they are entitled to due to administrative errors or adjustments.
2. Making unintentional errors on their application form, leading to more benefits than they deserve.
3. Receiving and using SNAP benefits while appealing a rejected application.
In such situations, administering state agencies have some leeway with “unintentional” violations. Under specific conditions, recipients may not be charged for outstanding amounts.
However, when the administering agency determines that someone has intentionally violated SNAP requirements, the consequences become more severe. In such cases, seeking legal counsel is highly recommended.
To steer clear of potential legal problems, both recipients and vendors participating in SNAP must fully understand the program and its requirements. The following steps can help prevent any issues:
– Never exchange benefits for money or sell/purchase items that the program prohibits.
– Complete and report any paperwork promptly.
– Report changes that could affect program participation right away.
– Report any abuses of the SNAP program and cooperate fully with authorities.
Furthermore, when facing legal problems associated with SNAP, having an attorney experienced in dealing with this program can be invaluable. They can help reduce fines, lessen or avoid jail time, restore canceled benefits, and advise clients on how to prevent future problems.
In conclusion, SNAP has been a lifesaver for millions of people through challenging times, making it a program that truly deserves preservation. By ensuring participants strictly adhere to its rules and protect the system’s integrity, we can safeguard the future of SNAP and its valuable assistance to those in need.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.