24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials

5

THE BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR.

The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation

Blog

Does SEC Investigation Affect Fund Registration

December 12, 2025

Does SEC Investigation Affect Fund Registration

Yes. And the effect is devastating in ways most fund managers don’t anticipate until it’s too late. An SEC investigation doesn’t automatically revoke your registration or bar you from operating. But it triggers disclosure obligations that effectively publicize your problems to everyone who matters – your investors, your prime broker, your counterparties, prospective clients, future employers.

Form ADV is the registration document every SEC-registered investment adviser must maintain. It’s publicly searchable on the Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) website. Anyone can look you up. And Form ADV requires disclosure of regulatory proceedings, disciplinary actions, and legal matters affecting the adviser and its management persons.

The moment an SEC investigation reaches a stage requiring Form ADV disclosure, your regulatory problems become public record. Every investor conducting due diligence will find it. Every compliance department at every potential counterparty will see it. The investigation might result in nothing. The disclosure is permanent.

The Disclosure Trigger Problem

Heres the thing most fund managers dont understand until there in it: Form ADV must be updated promptly when material changes occur. Not just annually – promptly. And an SEC investigation might constitute a material change requiring immediate disclosure.

When exactly does an investigation require disclosure? The rules focus on disciplinary events – convictions, findings against you, sanctions imposed. An ongoing investigation before any finding might not require disclosure under the specific disclosure items. But heres were it gets complicated.

If the SEC issues a Wells notice – indicating they intend to recommend enforcement action – that starts looking much more like something requiring disclosure. If formal proceedings are instituted, thats clearly disclosable. The problem is the gray zone: when does an informal inquiry become serious enough to require disclosure? When does a formal investigation that hasnt resulted in findings yet need to be reported?

Most fund managers err on the side of caution and disclose early, becuase the alternative is worse. Non-disclosure that the SEC later views as required creates a seperate violation – failure to maintain accurate Form ADV. Now you have two problems: the original investigation and the disclosure failure.

And non-disclosure isnt just a regulatory violation. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, making false statements to a federal agency – including omitting required information – is a federal crime. Under 15 U.S.C. § 80b-17, violations of Advisers Act disclosure requirements carry there own penalties. Hiding the investigation to protect your business could result in federal criminal charges.

WARNING: Non-disclosure of required information on Form ADV can constitute federal criminal violations under 18 U.S.C. § 1001. The cover-up can be worse than the original investigation.

What Form ADV Actually Requires

Let me be specific about what Form ADV disclosure involves, becuase understanding this helps you see how investigation information spreads.

Form ADV has two main parts. Part 1 contains checkbox information and brief answers. Part 2 – the “brochure” – contains narrative descriptions in plain English that must be provided to clients.

For disciplinary matters, Part 1 asks about criminal or civil judicial actions were the adviser or management person was convicted, pleaded guilty, pleaded no contest, or was found to have violated investment-related laws. It asks about administrative proceedings. It asks about self-regulatory organization proceedings. The lookback period is 10 years for most items.

Part 2 requires disclosure of legal or disciplinary events “material to a clients or prospective clients evaluation of the integrity of your management.” If an SEC investigation reaches a stage were its material to evaluating your integrity – and most would argue any formal investigation qualifies – you need to describe it in Part 2.

The disclosure must include what happened, who was involved, and how it was resolved. If its ongoing, you disclose that its ongoing. The narrative sits there, in plain language, for anyone to read.

And then theres the Investment Adviser Public Disclosure database – IAPD. Every Form ADV is searchable online. Enter any advisers name and you get there complete filing, including all disciplinary disclosures. Investors use it for due diligence. Compliance departments use it to vet counterparties. Journalists use it to find stories. Your SEC investigation becomes a matter of public record accessible to anyone with an internet connection.

The Private Fund Adviser Rules Complication

Heres something that changed recently and that many fund managers havent fully absorbed: the SEC’s new Private Fund Adviser Rules affect how you handle investigation costs.

Under the Restricted Activities Rule that took effect in 2023, private fund advisers face restrictions on charging investigation costs to the funds they manage. If an investigation results in sanctions for violating the Advisers Act, you cannot charge those investigation costs to the fund. Period. The adviser pays personally.

Even before sanctions are imposed, using fund assets to pay investigation expenses requires disclosure to investors – and in some cases, consent. You cant just quietly have the fund cover your legal bills anymore. Investors have to know, and depending on your fund documents, may have to approve.

Think about what this means practically. SEC investigation of your fund. You need $2 million in legal fees to defend. Under the old approach, the fund might have paid that. Under the new rules, you have to disclose your using fund assets for investigation costs. That disclosure itself triggers the redemption cascade. Or you pay personally – $2 million out of your own pocket while the matter is pending.

And if the investigation results in sanctions? You definitely cant recover those costs from the fund. Every dollar you spent on lawyers during the investigation comes from you personally. The fund and its investors are protected. You are not.

The Exempt Reporting Adviser Trap

Some fund managers think: Im not fully registered with the SEC. Im an Exempt Reporting Adviser, so these disclosure requirements dont apply to me.

Wrong. Exempt Reporting Advisers still file Form ADV Part 1. There still in the IAPD database. There still subject to disciplinary disclosure requirements on that filing. The “exempt” part means exempt from full registration requirements – not exempt from disclosure.

The private fund adviser exemption – available to advisers managing less then $150 million in private fund assets – still requires Form ADV filings as an Exempt Reporting Adviser. Those filings still require disciplinary disclosures. Those disclosures still appear publicly on IAPD.

And the new Private Fund Rules apply to all private fund advisers regardless of registration status. The Restricted Activities Rule hits everyone. The prohibition on charging sanctioned investigation costs to funds hits everyone. Being exempt from full registration dosent make you exempt from these requirements.

The only advisers truly outside SEC jurisdiction are those with no SEC-registered presence at all – no U.S. assets under management, no U.S. investors, completely offshore. And even then, if you have any U.S. touchpoints, the SEC might assert jurisdiction.

The Cascade That Destroys Funds

Heres the consequence cascade that investigation disclosure typically triggers. Its predictable, its devastating, and theres almost nothing you can do to stop it once it starts.

Step 1: Investigation becomes disclosable. You update Form ADV. The disclosure appears on IAPD.

Step 2: Existing investors conduct periodic due diligence or receive updated Form ADV brochure. They see the investigation disclosure.

Step 3: Investor compliance committees meet. Risk assessments are updated. The question is asked: should we remain invested in a fund under SEC investigation?

Step 4: Redemption requests arrive. Maybe a few at first. Then more as word spreads.

Step 5: You liquidate positions to meet redemptions. The fund shrinks. Performance suffers becuase your selling at inopportune times.

Step 6: Other investors see redemption activity and poor performance. More redemption requests.

Step 7: Prime broker sees the investigation disclosure and declining AUM. They reassess the relationship.

Step 8: Either the fund stabilizes at a much smaller size or it collapses entirely. Either way, the business you built is fundamentaly damaged.

Step 9: The SEC continues its investigation, now with the added complexity of examining how you handled investor redemptions during the collapse.

This cascade takes months, not years. Once investigation disclosure hits Form ADV, the clock starts. You might have a quarter before the worst redemptions. You might have less.

CRITICAL: Form ADV investigation disclosure triggers a cascade: investors see it → redemptions flood → fund shrinks → prime broker reassesses → business collapses. This happens within months of disclosure.

The Resolution That Dosent Fix Anything

Heres what fund managers hope: the investigation resolves favorably, we update Form ADV to show its resolved, everything goes back to normal.

Thats not how it works.

Form ADV disclosures are permanant for the disclosure period – 10 years for most items. Even if the SEC closes the investigation with no charges, the fact that there was an investigation remains on your record for a decade. Every prospective investor for the next 10 years will see: “SEC investigation, 2024-2025, closed without action.”

“Closed without action” sounds good. But it still raises questions. Why did the SEC investigate? What did they find even if they didnt charge? Should we be worried about the next investigation? Many institutional investors have policies against allocating to managers with any disciplinary history, regardless of outcome.

And the damage already done dosent reverse. The investors who redeemed during the investigation dont come back. The prime broker who terminated the relationship dosent reinstate it. The AUM you lost is gone. You might rebuild eventually, but you start from a damaged position.

Some fund managers try to let there registration lapse during an investigation, thinking this avoids disclosure. Bad idea. FINRA and the SEC track people who drop registration during pending matters. It looks like your running. And when you try to re-register later, the questions will be even harder.

The New Fund Problem

Heres something that hits fund managers especialy hard: the investigation dosent just affect your current registration. It affects your ability to launch new products.

Say your current fund is under investigation. You want to launch a second fund – maybe a different strategy, maybe a way to start fresh with clean capital. You file the necessary Form ADV amendments to add the new fund to your advisory business.

That amended Form ADV still carries the investigation disclosure. Every investor doing due diligence on the new fund sees the disclosure about the existing fund’s investigation. You havent escaped anything. The investigation follows you across every product you manage.

And think about what happens if you try to start completly fresh – new advisory firm, new registration, clean start. The SEC asks about your prior registrations. The principals’ disciplinary history follows them to the new firm. Form ADV asks about disciplinary events involving management persons, not just the current entity. You cant outrun it.

Some managers try to have partners or employees who arent personaly subject to the investigation launch the new entity. The SEC sees through this. If your effectivly controlling the new entity, if your capital is involved, if your the real decision-maker even without a formal title, regulators will connect the dots. And now youve added potential structuring concerns to your problems.

The Counterparty Due Diligence Reality

OK so lets talk about something fund managers often underestimate: how counterparties use Form ADV.

Every institutional counterparty has compliance and due diligence processes. Prime brokers check Form ADV before onboarding new clients and periodicaly for existing clients. Fund administrators review it. Auditors review it. Banks that provide financing review it.

These reviews are looking for exactly the kind of disclosures that SEC investigations trigger. There policies – often written in stone after past problems – that say things like: “Do not onboard clients with pending regulatory investigations” or “Escalate for senior review any client with disciplinary disclosures.”

Once your investigation appears on Form ADV, these automated and semi-automated screening processes flag you. What was a smooth counterparty relationship becomes a quarterly escalation, a compliance committee review, a reassessment of whether to continue the relationship.

And potential new counterparty relationships become much harder. Your trying to establish a new prime brokerage relationship or get a new credit facility. The counterpartys compliance team pulls your Form ADV, sees the investigation disclosure, and the conversation ends. They dont want the risk. There are plenty of funds without SEC investigations they can work with instead.

This affects not just obvious counterparties but everyone who touches your business. Compliance consultants. Legal counsel looking to do ongoing work. Even potential hires who research the firm before joining. Everyone checks IAPD. Everyone sees the disclosure.

The Insurance Complication

Heres were the registration impact intersects with another problem: professional liability insurance.

Your D&O and E&O insurance policies typically have disclosure requirements. When a claim or potential claim arises – and an SEC investigation definately qualifies – you must notify the insurer. This notification might need to happen before or simultaniously with Form ADV disclosure.

But heres the problem. Once you disclose to your insurer, they start assessing there own exposure. They might increase premiums at renewal. They might add exclusions. They might non-renew entirely. Insurance carriers dont want to cover funds under active SEC investigation any more then prime brokers want to clear for them.

And the Form ADV disclosure affects your insurance renewal independantly of your notification. Insurance underwriters check IAPD as part of there renewal process. Even if you somehow didnt notify them directly, theyll see the investigation disclosure when they pull your public filings.

So you face insurance uncertainty at exactly the moment you need coverage most. The SEC investigation is ongoing. Your facing potential defense costs and liability. And your insurer is deciding whether to continue covering you, at what price, and with what exclusions.

The Employee and Partner Problem

Think about your employees and partners. How does investigation disclosure affect them?

Any “management person” under your Form ADV might have there own disclosure obligations triggered. If there named in connection with the investigation, even as a witness rather then a target, that might require disclosure on there Form U4 if there also registered with FINRA.

Key employees start thinking about there own careers. Association with a fund under SEC investigation isnt good for resumes. The best people – the ones with options – may start looking elsewhere. Your facing the investigation with a potentially depleted team.

Partners may have different views about how to handle the situation. Disagreements about strategy, about disclosure timing, about whether to fight or settle, can fracture partnerships that seemed solid before regulatory pressure hit.

And recruting becomes impossible. Who wants to join a fund under SEC investigation? The disclosure on Form ADV that prospective investors see is the same disclosure prospective employees see. Your talent pipeline dries up at exactly the moment you need the best people to help navigate the crisis.

What You Should Actually Do

Accept that disclosure is coming. If the SEC investigation is serious enough that youre asking whether it affects registration, its probly serious enough that disclosure will be required. Plan for that reality rather then hoping to avoid it.

Talk to securities counsel immediatly about disclosure timing and requirements. The gray areas around when disclosure is required are technical and fact-specific. You need expert advice on what must be disclosed when.

Control the narrative to the extent possible. Your Form ADV Part 2 narrative can explain context, note that the matter is ongoing, and describe your cooperation. Make sure the disclosure is accurate but also complete enough that readers understand the full picture.

Communicate proactivly with key investors. They will find out anyway. Better they hear from you, with context, then discover it on IAPD with no explanation.

Prepare for redemptions. Model what happens to the fund at various redemption levels. Have liquidity ready. Understand your gating provisions. The redemption wave is coming – be ready for it.

Understand the new Private Fund Rules. If your going to be paying investigation costs personally rather then from fund assets, thats a completly different financial planning situation. You might be looking at millions of dollars in defense costs that cant be charged to the fund. Know what your facing. Talk to your accountant. Talk to your financial advisor. Model the personal cash flow implications of a multi-year SEC investigation were you bear all the costs personally.

And document everything about how you handled disclosure, investor communications, and redemptions. If the SEC investigation expands to examine your handling of the fund during the investigation period, you want clear records showing you acted properly.

The SEC investigation dosent just affect your registration. It becomes part of your registration – publicly, permanantly, for everyone to see. Every investor checks IAPD. Every counterparty checks IAPD. Every potential employee checks IAPD. The disclosure you make today will be visible for 10 years. There is no hiding, no minimizing, no hoping nobody notices.

Plan accordingly. Your disclosure is coming.

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile

RALPH P. FRANCO, JR

Associate

view profile

JEREMY FEIGENBAUM

Associate Attorney

view profile

ELIZABETH GARVEY

Associate

view profile

CLAIRE BANKS

Associate

view profile

RAJESH BARUA

Of-Counsel

view profile

CHAD LEWIN

Of-Counsel

view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now