Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
A lot of folks have been asking whether Amendment 821, which restricts the use of criminal convictions in employment decisions, applies to old convictions from before the law was passed. I totally get why there’s confusion–it’s a complicated issue. Let me walk through it in a simple, conversational way.
First off, I know this is an emotional topic. Many people with old convictions face huge struggles finding work and getting their lives back on track after serving their time. My heart goes out to them–it’s just not right to punish people forever for mistakes in their past.
Now, on to the legal nitty-gritty. The text of Amendment 821 says employers can’t ask about criminal records on job applications. It also says they can only consider convictions less than 7 years old when making hiring choices. Pretty straightforward, right?
Well, here’s the catch–the law doesn’t say whether it applies retroactively. That’s legalese for whether it applies to things that happened before it took effect. So does it restrict the use of convictions from, say, 2008? That’s the million dollar question.
Most laws aren’t retroactive–they only apply going forward. But Amendment 821 is a little different, because it impacts how people are treated based on their past. So there’s an argument that the lawmakers intended it to apply retroactively.
Here are some key cases that shed light on this:
As you can see, reasonable judges have disagreed! With no definitive precedent, lawyers can make arguments either way.
Here are some of the key pros and cons to consider:
As you can see, reasonable people can disagree on this issue. Until we get a definitive court ruling or the law is clarified, there’s no 100% right answer.
If you have an old conviction and have faced problems getting hired, I’d encourage you to consult an attorney. They can review your specific situation and options. An employment lawyer can also provide practical tips for how to discuss your record positively with employers.
The most important thing is not to get discouraged. Focus on putting your best foot forward and showing employers the great skills you bring to the job. There are companies out there who will give you a fair chance if you keep persevering.
I hope this overview was helpful in explaining the key issues on this topic. Let me know if you have any other questions!
 “What do multiple commas mean, in informal writing?”, English Stack Exchange, https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/562979/what-do-multiple-commas-mean-in-informal-writing
 “It’s not… It is”, Reddit r/grammar, https://www.reddit.com/r/grammar/comments/16n7vzc/its_not_it_is/
 “Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules”, United States Courts, https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2023-10_evidence_rules_agenda_book_final_10-5_0.pdf
 “Knowing When to Stop: Is the Punctuation of the Constitution Based on Sound or Sense?”, UF Law Scholarship Repository, https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1712&context=flr
 “Learn to Lead”, Civil Air Patrol, https://www.gocivilairpatrol.com/media/cms/Vol2LetterLowFinal_8BDFDB373E830.pdf
 “Why are people using ellipses instead of a period?”, Ask MetaFilter, https://ask.metafilter.com/53094/Why-are-people-using-ellipses-instead-of-a-period
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.