Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 21st October 2023, 08:58 am
If you’ve been charged with a federal drug crime, don’t panic. There are a number of legal defenses that a good lawyer can use to fight the charges against you. This article will go over some of the most common defenses used in federal drug cases and give you an idea of what options are out there.
One of the most basic defenses is to argue that the prosecution lacks sufficient evidence to prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The burden of proof is on the prosecution to show that you actually committed the crime. If the evidence against you is weak or circumstantial, a good defense attorney can argue there is reasonable doubt and you should be found not guilty.
For example, if the only evidence is a small amount of drugs found in your car, your lawyer could argue the drugs belonged to someone else, like a friend or family member who borrowed the car. Or if you’re caught with drugs after a suspicious tip, your lawyer can argue the informant isn’t credible.
Another common defense is to claim the police obtained evidence through an illegal search or seizure that violated your Fourth Amendment rights. If the search of your property or person was done without a warrant or probable cause, the evidence found may be excluded.
For instance, if officers stopped and searched you without reasonable suspicion of a crime, any drugs found during that search could not be used to prosecute you. Or if the police searched your home without a warrant and discovered drugs, that evidence could be suppressed.
A defense of entrapment claims that you were induced or coerced by police into committing a crime you otherwise wouldn’t have. For this defense to work, you have to show you had no predisposition to commit the crime until law enforcement pressured you into it.
This applies mainly to undercover sting operations. If an undercover agent aggressively pushed you to deal drugs you were initially unwilling to sell, that aggressive behavior could constitute entrapment. But you have to prove you weren’t already predisposed to sell the drugs.
Similar to entrapment, you could claim the government’s conduct was so outrageous that it violates due process and warrants dismissal. This defense argues that police overstepped the bounds of proper investigative techniques and essentially manufactured the crime.
For example, providing ingredients to synthesize illegal drugs or repeatedly supplying drugs to build evidence could be viewed as outrageous government conduct. But the conduct usually needs to be quite extreme to succeed with this defense.
You can defend against drug possession charges by claiming you had no knowledge the drugs were there. Essentially you argue that someone else placed the drugs in your belongings or vehicle without your knowledge.
This defense requires you to show you didn’t know about the drugs and usually works best alongside an argument that the drugs belonged to someone else. It also applies mainly to possession charges, since a lack of knowledge is not a defense against charges of selling drugs.
The defenses of duress and necessity argue you committed the crime out of fear or compulsion. For example, you could claim you trafficked drugs because a drug cartel threatened your family if you refused. Or you possessed drugs because a violent partner forced you to. These defenses require proof of imminent harm if you didn’t break the law.
Necessity is used when you argue you broke the law to prevent a greater harm from occurring. For instance, a medical necessity defense could argue that using marijuana is necessary to treat a debilitating health condition.
You can claim you lacked the mental capacity to understand your actions or know right from wrong. This defense requires providing evidence of a mental disease or defect through psychological evaluations. It likely requires testimony from mental health professionals.
In federal court, this defense rarely succeeds fully. But it may lead prosecutors to drop the most serious charges and pursue lesser charges instead.
The statute of limitations sets a time limit for prosecutors to file charges after a crime occurs. For federal drug crimes, this ranges from 3-5 years usually. If charges are brought after the statute of limitations expires, a good defense lawyer can get the case dismissed.
The clock for the statute of limitations starts when the crime is complete, not when it’s discovered. This defense succeeds if prosecutors missed the filing deadline.
If the initial arrest that brought you into custody was unlawful, evidence obtained as a result may be suppressed. An illegal arrest occurs if police lacked probable cause or a warrant to make the arrest. Any statements you made or evidence found after an illegal arrest could potentially be excluded.
The U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to a speedy trial. If prosecutors delay your trial excessively, your charges could possibly be dismissed on speedy trial grounds. To succeed, you must show the delay caused actual prejudice against your defense.
Federal courts look at four factors to determine if speedy trial rights were violated: the length of the delay, the reason for the delay, whether the defense asserted speedy trial rights, and if the delay prejudiced the defense.
If prosecutors offer a plea deal but then rescind the offer unjustly, file additional charges, or make sentencing recommendations they agreed not to, it violates the plea agreement. This breach of the agreement can be used as a defense to nullify the plea deal.
However, you usually have to show how the violation prejudiced you or that you relied on the plea offer in good faith before withdrawing your plea.
Those are some of the most common defenses used to fight federal drug crimes. But every case is different, so talk to an experienced federal drug defense lawyer about the best defense strategies for your specific situation.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.