Criminal Defense Lawyers

What is Nominee Owner Tax Fraud

What is Nominee Owner Tax Fraud

Nominee owner tax fraud is when you put assets in someone else’s name to hide them from the IRS. That’s the basic definition. But here’s what nobody tells you: putting assets in another person’s name doesn’t make them invisible. It creates MORE evidence that you’re trying to evade taxes. The nominee arrangement itself becomes proof of fraudulent intent. You thought you were hiding assets. You were actually building the case for your own prosecution.

Welcome to Spodek Law Group. We’re putting this information on our website because nominee fraud is one of those crimes where people genuinely believe they’ve found a loophole. They think if their name isn’t on the title, the IRS can’t touch the asset. That’s completely wrong. The IRS doesn’t care whose name is on the paper. They care who controls the money. Todd Spodek has represented clients who thought putting a house in their brother’s name or a business in their wife’s name would protect them from collection. They discovered that the nominee arrangement didn’t shield them from anything – it just added fraud charges to their tax problems.

The IRS has specific legal doctrines designed to pierce exactly these kinds of arrangements. Under nominee liability, the IRS can pursue assets held by third parties if you’re the true owner. Under alter ego doctrine, they can ignore corporate structures entirely and collect directly from you. The legal title means nothing. Control means everything. And the 90% conviction rate for IRS criminal prosecutions means that if they charge you with nominee fraud, you’re almost certainly going to prison.

The Crime That Creates More Crime

Heres the paradox that destroys people. You have a tax debt. You want to protect your assets from IRS collection. So you put your house in your brothers name. Or your bank accounts in your wifes name. Or your business in a shell company controlled by a friend. You think your being clever. Your actualy commiting a new crime on top of the original tax problem.

The original tax debt might have been a civil matter. You owed money. The IRS wanted to collect. Maybe there were penalties and interest. Thats bad, but its not prison. Now you add the nominee arrangement. Suddenly your not just someone who owes taxes – your someone who activly hid assets to avoid paying them. Thats tax evasion. Thats fraud. Thats criminal.

Think about the irony here. You were trying to protect yourself. You doubled your legal exposure. The nominee arrangement that was supposed to shield you becomes the evidence prosecutors use to prove fraudulent intent. Why would you put your house in someone elses name unless you were trying to hide it? The structure reveals the intent. Your protection strategy becomes your prosecution strategy.

What “Nominee Owner” Actually Means

Heres how the IRS actualy looks at nominee ownership. They dont care whose name is on the title. They care who controls the asset. Who makes the decisions? Who recieves the benefits? Who pays the bills? If your living in a house thats in your brothers name, paying the mortgage, making the repairs, and acting like the owner – your the owner. The title means nothing.

A nominee is someone who holds bare legal title for another. Thats the technical definition. They might sign documents. They might appear on records. But they have little or no actual control over the assets. The true owner – the beneficial owner – directs all activity from behind the scenes.

The IRS uses whats called the “nominee liability doctrine” to pursue these assets. Under this doctrine, they can collect against property held by a third party if the evidence shows that the taxpayer is the real owner. The nominees name on the deed dosent protect the property. Your control of the property is what matters. And if the IRS can show you controlled the asset, they can seize it to satisfy your tax debt – regardless of whose name is on the title.

The Paper Trail You Think You’re Hiding

Heres the thing people dont understand. They think nominee arrangements hide assets. In reality, nominee arrangements CREATE evidence. Evidence that investigators use to prove the scheme.

Think about what a nominee arrangement actualy requires. Somebody has to sign documents. Somebody has to appear on bank accounts. Somebody has to file corporate papers. Somebody has to recieve mail and forward it to you. Every one of these actions creates a record. Every record is traceable. The paper trail you thought you were eliminating is actualy being constructed by the very steps you take to hide ownership.

Professional nominees are even worse. Some nominees hold 100+ directorships – they literaly sell there names to anyone who pays. This pattern is obvious to investigators. When they see the same person appearing as director of dozens of shell companies, they know exactly what there looking at. The investigation dosent even require sophisticated analysis. The pattern screams “nominee arrangement.”

And heres the part that really destroys people. Nominees cooperate. When investigators come knocking, the person whose name is on your assets has no reason to protect you. There facing there own potential liability. The fastest way to reduce there exposure is to explain exactly how the arrangement worked – who the real owner was, who made the decisions, who recieved the benefits. The person you trusted to hold your assets will turn on you to save themselves.

How the IRS Ignores Your Legal Structure

Heres what the IRS actualy does when they find a nominee arrangement. They use something called the “alter ego doctrine” to pierce right through whatever structure you created.

Under alter ego doctrine, the IRS can ignore your corporate structure completly. It dosent matter that you formed an LLC. It dosent matter that the LLC owns the property. It dosent matter that your name appears nowhere on any document. If the IRS can show that you treated the entity as your alter ego – using its assets as your own, ignoring corporate formalities, making personal decisions through the corporate form – they can collect against those assets directly.

The alter ego analysis looks at a bunch of factors. Did you maintain seperate books? Did you follow corporate formalities? Did you adequatly capitalize the entity? Did you use corporate assets for personal purposes? If the answers suggest you treated the entity as an extension of yourself rather then a seperate legal person, the IRS treats it that way too.

And heres the uncomfortable truth. In nominee and alter ego cases, the IRS dosent have to prove you intended to “hinder, defraud, or delay” collection. They just have to prove you controlled the assets. The lower standard of proof makes these cases much easier for the government to win. You can have the best lawyers in the world, but if the facts show you controlled property titled in someone elses name, your loosing that property.

The Shell Company Trap

Heres how shell companies fit into nominee schemes. People think layering ownership through multiple entities creates protection. It dosent. It creates a roadmap.

The typical structure works like this. You form a company. That company is owned by another company. That company is owned by a third company. Maybe one or more of these entities is in a foreign jurisdiction. Maybe the directors are professional nominees. Maybe theres a trust somewhere in the chain. The idea is that investigators will get lost in the layers and give up.

They dont give up. FinCEN, IRS-CI, and FBI all share data on these structures. Theres a federal database tracking shell companies and nominee arrangements. When investigators start pulling strings, they follow the money. Who funded the original entity? Who recieves distributions? Whose lifestyle does the entity support? The legal structure is irrelevant. The money trail tells the story.

The Corporate Transparency Act has made this even more dangerous. The law now requires companies to disclose there beneficial owners to FinCEN. Hiding behind nominees is explicitly illegal. If you provide false or fraudulent beneficial ownership information, your facing civil penalties of $500 per day, fines up to $10,000, and two years in federal prison. If the false disclosure is part of a pattern involving more then $100,000, the penalties escalate to $500,000 in fines and ten years in prison.

People Who Thought 35 Years Was Enough

Lets look at what happens to people who thought there nominee arrangements were invisible.

Dan Rotta was a Miami businessman. Between 1985 and 2020 – thats 35 years – he hid more then $20 million in assets in dozens of secret Swiss bank accounts. He used nominees and attorney trust fund accounts to route transfers and conceal his use of the funds from the IRS. For three and a half decades, he thought he was safe.

He wasnt safe. Federal investigators traced the money. They followed the nominee arrangements. They connected the attorney trust accounts to his beneficial ownership. In 2023, he was sentenced to 60 months in federal prison. Five years. Thirty-five years of thinking he was clever, followed by five years behind bars.

Think about what that means. You can run a nominee scheme for decades. You can use sophisticated structures. You can route money through multiple jurisdictions. And the IRS can still find you. The statute of limitations on criminal tax evasion is six years from the last act in furtherance of the fraud. Every time Dan Rotta accessed those accounts, the clock reset. His ongoing concealment kept the prosecution window open indefinatly.

The Professional Nominee Problem

Heres something that should terrify anyone using nominee services. Professional nominees – people who sell there names to appear on corporate documents – have no loyalty to you. There running a business. When that business creates legal risk, there going to protect themselves.

Some nominees hold directorships in over 100 companies. Think about that. One person appearing as the director of 100+ entities. This pattern is so obvious that its actualy a red flag investigators specificaly look for. Nobody runs 100 legitimate companies simultaneously. That pattern screams shell company network. That pattern triggers investigation.

And when investigators come, the nominee has every incentive to cooperate. There not going to prison to protect your assets. There going to explain exactly how the arrangement worked. Who paid them. Who gave instructions. Who was the real owner. Every question the government asks, they answer – becuase answering protects them.

Frank Butselaar was an international tax advisor. He used nominees to conceal his clients offshore income. When clients became US tax residents, he would install nominee owners on there offshore structures to make it appear the earnings belonged to someone else. He thought the nominees created distance between the clients and there money. He got 30 months in federal prison and was ordered to pay $15.5 million in restitution.

The Conviction Reality

IRS Criminal Investigation has a 90% conviction rate on cases they accept for prosecution. Let that sink in. Nine out of ten people charged with tax crimes are convicted. The IRS dosent bring cases they might loose. By the time you see charges, theyve already built an airtight case.

For nominee fraud specificaly, the cases are often even stronger. The paper trail is extensive. The nominee will testify against you. The financial flows prove beneficial ownership. Your own actions – living in the house, spending from the account, making decisions about the business – prove control. What defense do you have? The facts speak for themselves.

Michael Caravella was a New Jersey construction company owner. From 2008 to 2019 – eleven years – he placed companies in the names of nominee owners and avoided using bank accounts in his own name. He thought this would prevent the IRS from levying his funds. He also continued causing his businesses not to pay employment taxes, resulting in an additional $1.2 million loss to the IRS. Total tax loss: $1.88 million. He was sentenced for tax evasion.

Matthew McPherson used nominees to fraudulently obtain federal contracts set aside for veterans and minorities. When his company grew too large to qualify, he used the minority status of an employee to set up a sham company. He got 28 months in federal prison and forfeited $5.5 million. The nominee arrangement that was supposed to help him get contracts became the evidence that proved the fraud.

The Corporate Transparency Act Changes Everything

The Panama Papers leak in 2016 exposed how the wealthy worldwide used nominee shareholders to hide assets. That scandal led directly to the Corporate Transparency Act, which fundamentaly changes the game for anyone trying to hide beneficial ownership.

Under the CTA, companies must report there beneficial owners to FinCEN. A beneficial owner is anyone who exercises substantial control over the company or owns at least 25% of its ownership interests. You cant hide behind nominees anymore. The law explicitly requires disclosure of the real people behind the corporate structure.

The penalties are severe. Willfully providing false beneficial ownership information carries civil penalties of $500 per day. Criminal penalties include fines up to $10,000 and two years in prison. If the false disclosure is part of a pattern involving more then $100,000 in a 12-month period, the penalties escalate to $500,000 in fines and ten years in federal prison.

The CTA creates a new crime where there wasnt one before. Previously, you might use nominees and face nominee liability or alter ego claims – civil matters the IRS would pursue in collection. Now the failure to disclose beneficial ownership is itself criminal. You dont need to owe taxes. You dont need to be hiding assets from collection. Simply failing to accurately report who owns your company is a federal offense.

The Forfeiture Cascade

When the government proves you used nominees to hide assets, they dont just collect taxes. They take everything connected to the scheme. Asset forfeiture in nominee cases works like a cascade that strips away everything youve accumulated.

The process starts with identifying assets controlled by nominees. The IRS traces financial flows – deposits, withdrawals, purchases, payments. They document who made decisions, who benefited, who exercised control. Once they establish that your the beneficial owner despite the nominees name on title, the forfeiture process begins.

Real estate gets seized. Bank accounts get frozen. Business assets get taken. The house you thought was protected by being in your brothers name? Gone. The investment accounts titled to your shell company? Seized. The car registered to your wifes LLC? Forfeited. Every asset the government can connect to the nominee arrangement becomes government property.

And heres the part people dont understand. Civil forfeiture can happen BEFORE your convicted of anything. The government files a seperate action against the property itself. Your property is the defendant. The burden of proof is lower in civil forfeiture then in criminal cases. You have to prove your assets are clean, not the other way around. Even if your eventualy aquitted of criminal charges, you may never get the forfeited property back.

What This Means For Your Assets

If your using nominee arrangements to hide assets – whether from the IRS, creditors, or anyone else – you need to understand the cascade of consequences.

Heres how it unfolds. You put property in a nominees name. Eventually, the IRS audits you. They notice your lifestyle dosent match your reported income. They start looking for hidden assets. They find the nominee arrangement. Now your original tax problem becomes a tax fraud problem. The civil matter becomes criminal. Your facing prison plus still owing all the original taxes plus penalties plus interest plus restitution.

The nominee makes things worse, not better. The asset protection trusts that promoters claim make you “judgment-proof” dont work when courts look at economic substance. If you still control the assets, if you still live in the house, if you still spend from the accounts – the legal structure is irrelevant. Courts pierce right through it.

Clients come to Spodek Law Group after making exactly these mistakes. They thought putting assets in a relatives name would protect them. They thought forming an offshore company would create distance. They thought the legal structure would shield them from collection. Then they discovered that the IRS has decades of experience piercing exactly these kinds of arrangements – and the nominee structure just added criminal exposure to what might have been a civil collection matter.

If your already using nominees to hold assets, you need to understand the exposure. If the IRS hasnt found the arrangement yet, they will eventualy. The question is whether you deal with it proactivly or wait untill criminal charges are filed. Early intervention can sometimes convert a criminal matter to civil resolution. Waiting untill prosecution means your negotiating from the weakest possible position.

Todd Spodek has handled cases exactly like this. We understand how the government traces nominee arrangements, what evidence they use, and were the vulnerabilities might be. If your hiding assets through nominees, the government may already be building a case. Every day you wait is another day of evidence they collect.

Call us at 212-300-5196. The consultation is free. Loosing everything you built becuase you tried to hide it isnt.