Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 20th October 2023, 11:43 am
Federal prosecutors have an incredible amount of power that is often shocking to defendants. They decide who to charge with crimes, what crimes to charge them with, and what kind of plea deals to offer. The federal criminal justice system is set up to encourage defendants to take plea deals rather than go to trial. Going to trial is very risky because federal prosecutors win over 90% of cases. Even innocent people often take plea deals to avoid long mandatory minimum sentences if convicted at trial.
Federal prosecutors have so much power because Congress passes laws with harsh mandatory minimum sentences. Even low level crimes like drug possession have mandatory minimums of 5, 10, 15 years or more. Prosecutors use the threat of long mandatory sentences to get defendants to take plea deals for lesser charges.
Another reason federal prosecutors are so powerful is they decide what evidence to use at trial. They use legal loopholes to get evidence admitted that would normally be excluded. For example, federal agents do illegal searches without warrants, but prosecutors find excuses to get the evidence admitted. Defense lawyers argue it should be excluded, but judges usually side with the prosecution.
Prosecutors also have the power to pile on charges for the same crime. For example, if a defendant sells drugs one time, they could be charged with 5 different charges for that single act. Each charge carries a mandatory minimum sentence, so the defendant is facing a potential life sentence for one minor crime.
Many legal experts argue federal prosecutors have too much power. Their harsh tactics force innocent people to plead guilty out of fear. Its easy for them to get convictions because the rules favor the prosecution. Some reforms have been proposed, like reducing mandatory minimums and improving police training. But so far, federal prosecutors power remains unchecked.
Fighting federal prosecutors is an uphill battle, but there are strategies defense lawyers use to protect their clients rights:
One important defense strategy is understanding mandatory minimum sentencing guidelines. Defense lawyers analyze the charges to see if they were applied accurately. Sometimes they can get charges reduced or dropped if the guidelines were misapplied.
Another strategy is digging into the defendants background and personal circumstances for mitigating factors. Defense lawyers present sympathetic details about the defendant like mental health issues, abuse suffered, good works done, etc. This can influence prosecutors decisions on plea deals, and judges discretion at sentencing if it goes to trial.
But despite their best efforts, defense lawyers know beating federal prosecutors is an uphill battle. The system is rigged against defendants from the start. Until reforms are made, federal prosecutors will continue wielding unchecked power over peoples lives.
Here are some of the most important issues in the federal criminal justice system that enable prosecutors power:
Mandatory minimums are a key source of prosecutors power. Even low level crimes carry multi-year minimums like:
Prosecutors use these to force plea deals. Some argue mandatory minimums should be reduced or eliminated to curb prosecutorial overreach. But Congress continues passing laws with harsh mandatory sentences.
Another issue is the rules of evidence favor federal prosecutors. They can get illegally obtained evidence admitted through exceptions and legal loopholes. Defense arguments to exclude evidence often fail even when officers violate constitutional rights.
For example, federal agents routinely do warrantless searches and seizures that violate the 4th Amendment. But prosecutors argue exceptions like “plain view,” “exigent circumstances,” or “inevitable discovery” to get the evidence admitted. Judges tend to side with the prosecution.
Prosecutors often use questionable tactics like threats and intimidation to coerce witnesses into testifying against defendants. They threaten charges or prison if witnesses dont cooperate. Even when witnesses have credibility issues or ulterior motives, prosecutors use them at trial.
Prosecutors also offer incentives like immunity, plea deals, and cash payments in return for testimony. They withhold evidence that witnesses have been compensated from the defense. Paid witnesses have motivation to lie on the stand, but jurors dont know.
There are many examples of federal prosecutors engaging in misconduct like suppressing evidence, misleading the court, intimidating witnesses, falsifying testimony, and other unethical behavior. But they are rarely disciplined or penalized. Courts tend to turn a blind eye even in egregious cases.
Prosecutors have immunity for misconduct related to their jobs. The only recourse is reporting them to state bar associations, but serious punishment is rare. Until prosecutors are held accountable, misconduct will persist.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.