In the context of criminal proceedings, there are a number of Constitutional protections designed to keep defendants from being overrun by the state. The broadest, most helpful of those tools lies in the Sixth Amendment, which guarantees the right to a fair trial. With this amendment, there are requirements that the government provide every person with an attorney and that trials are generally conducted in a manner that is balanced. There is also a provision guaranteeing to people the right of a speedy trial. Because the ability to mount a defense can erode over time, a trial can only be fair when it is speedy. People charged with crimes should always been in touch with a good lawyer, and if it’s been a long time between arrest and trial, they may have a speedy trial claim.
The speedy trial rule generally
The Sixth Amendment generally guarantees that the government will bring a person to trial in a quick and efficient manner. What this means depends on the situation. There is no set amount of time in which the government must bring a person to trial. However, the courts have been willing to grant defendants relief if the government takes too long to bring the person to trial. In general, once a person has been waiting around for two years or more, they have the potential win on a speedy trial claim.
Why the speedy trial claim exists
Mounting a defense in a criminal case can be difficult. People need access to witness testimony, to physical evidence and to a host of other things that might persuade a jury. Likewise, the memory of the defendant can erode over time. When a big chunk of a person’s legal defense depends on his ability to remember details about the day or night or a crime, having a trial delay can cause real problems over the long run. Speedy trial rules are meant to protect the integrity of the process.
In addition, the speedy trial rule is based on the idea that no person should have to either wait in custody for a trial or wait under the looming uncertainty of a coming trial. The system works well when issues go in front of a court for resolution. If people are guilty, then they should begin serving their sentences. If they are not guilty, then they should be cleared of the crime and given an opportunity to have a normal life once again.
The factors that determine when a person’s speedy trial rights have been violated
In general, the court will use a balancing test to determine whether a person has suffered a breach of his or her speedy trial rights. The most important factor is the length of time. The longer the government delays, the more likely a person is to win his claim. In addition, the court will try to ascertain who was at fault for the delay. In general, it is the government’s obligation to bring a person to trial because he cannot bring himself to trial. However, in scenarios where a defendant delays the process by asking for continuances or changing lawyers, he is less likely to win one of these claims.
In addition, the court will weigh whether a person has been in custody. A person sitting in jail waiting on trial has suffered worse than one who is out on bail. An increasingly important factor is whether a person attempts to exercise his right to a speedy trial. letters or attempts by a defendant or his lawyer to speed up the process work heavily in his favor. Finally, the court will ask whether a person has suffered prejudice because of the delay. The extent to which key evidence is gone or people have died will help determine whether a person has been harmed by the delay.
Speedy trial violation remedies
One of the best things about a speedy trial claim is that there exists only one remedy the court can issue. Because it is no longer possible for a person to have a fair trial, the court will always command the lower courts to dismiss the case. The charges must be dropped, and the person must be released from custody.
If you have been arrested and are facing a life-altering trial, having a good lawyer is a big help. Some lawyers are adept at helping to ensure your rights, including the speedy trial right. Having one of your side can make a huge difference in the outcome of your case.
What is New York Speedy Trial Statute?
Defendants have the constitutional right to a speedy trial. This means that defendants cannot be kept waiting and languishing for a trial data and conclusion to their criminal charge. The constitutional right to a speedy trial is found in Amendments VI and XIV of the U.S. Constitution. In New York, CPL 30.20 and the Civil Rights Law guarantee this federal constitutional right despite it not being in the New York State Constitution. In cases regarding juvenile delinquency proceedings, the speedy trial protection is available under the Family Court Act.
It is important to note that in New York, as opposed to CPL 30.30, which states that the People be ready for trial within a certain amount of time, after the “commencement” of the action, the constitutional time period is the length between the commencement and the actual start of trial.
The remedy for delay is a dismissal with prejudice. If a defendant’s constitutional right is violated, the remedy to it is a dismissal of charges with prejudice. A dismissal with prejudice means that the prosecution is unable to pursue the charges again. There are five factors considered in regards to a dismissal for the failure of a speedy trial. Unlike the statutory speedy trial right, there is no specific time limit that would trigger a right to s speedy trial right to dismissal. The five factors the court weighs is: the extent of the delay; the reason for the delay; the nature of the underlying charge; the extent of the pretrial incarceration, and whether the defense was impaired by the delay.
The constitutional right to a speedy trial does not apply to any post conviction delays. If a defendant is found convicted, but the conviction is reversed, the delay between the reversal and the retrial does not violate the right to a speedy trial. The right to the speedy trial only applies to the defendant until they are brought to trial.
If there has been a long delay between the commission of the crime and the defendant’s arrest, there may be a due process violation that is separate from a speedy trial. For example, if a victim identifies the defendant in a photograph, but the police take a prolonged time to charge the defendant, this is a due process violation. The fact that the police take a long time to charge and the prosecution to indict would be a due process violation. If there has been a prolonged delay, prosecution has the burden to show the cause of the delay and that it was justified.
The causes of the delay determine whether there has been a due process violation. The court considering whether there has been a due process violation will look at five factors. The factors are nearly identical to the five factors discussed above regarding the right to a speedy trial. These five are: the length of the delay; the reason for the delay; the degree of prejudice to the defendant; the serious of the underlying crime; and the extent of pretrial incarceration.
The judge may schedule a hearing to determine if the facts fit the five issues. However, a significant delay in prosecution may result in a dismissal, regardless of prejudice. In both instances, the right to a speedy trial and the right to due process, a violation of these rights would result in a dismissal of charges with prejudice.
In certain instances the defense attorney may choose to waive the right to speedy trial and CPL 30.30. The choice to waive this right is a generally a strategy tactic. For example, a prosecutor may predicate consent to an adjournment or any request/motion from the defense on the defense’s waiver to speedy trial or CPL 30.30.
Spodek Law Group have offered me excellent support and advice thru a very difficult time. I feel I've dealt with someone who truly cares and wants the best outcome for you and yours. I'm extremely grateful for all the help Spodek Law Group has offered me. I can't recommend them enough.
Spodek Law Group was incredibly professional and has given me the best advice I could wish for. They had been helpful and empathetic to my stressful situation. Would highly recommend Spodek Law Group to anyone I meet.
Best service I ever had. Todd is absolutely class personified. You are in the safest hands with spodek. They have their clients interest in mind.
We provide superior service, excellent results, at a level superior to other criminal defense law firms. Regardless of where your case is, nationwide, we can help you.
"Spodek Law Group have offered me excellent support and advice thru a very difficult time. I feel I've dealt with someone who truly cares and wants the best outcome for you and yours. I'm extremely grateful for all the help Spodek Law Group has offered me. I can't recommend them..."David Bruce
"Spodek Law Group was incredibly professional and has given me the best advice I could wish for. They had been helpful and empathetic to my stressful situation. Would highly recommend Spodek Law Group to anyone I meet."Rowlin Garcia
"Best service I ever had. Todd is absolutely class personified. You are in the safest hands with spodek. They have their clients interest in mind."Francis Anim
555 W 5th St 35th floor, Los Angeles, CA 90013
35-37 36th St, 2nd Floor Astoria, NY 11106
85 Broad St 30th Floor, New York, NY 10004
195 Montague St., 14th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201