24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials

5

THE BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR.

The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation

Blog

San Diego, CA Federal Criminal Defense Lawyers

December 21, 2025

San Diego, CA Federal Criminal Defense Lawyers

Welcome to Spodek Law Group. If your facing federal charges in San Diego, you need to understand something most defense content wont tell you directly. San Diego’s Southern District of California isnt a routine border prosecution district. Its a federal prosecution laboratory.

Most people think San Diego federal cases are standard border work – drug smuggling across from Tijuana, immigration violations, maybe some Navy fraud from the military bases. Routine stuff that happens in every border district from Brownsville to El Paso to Nogales. But heres what practitioners actualy know: San Diego is were prosecutors test multi-agency coordination strategies before deploying them nationwide. The Border Enforcement Security Task Forces operating in San Diego include nineteen different federal, state, local, and Mexican law enforcement agencies. Nineteen. When your facing federal charges in San Diego, your not facing the federal goverment. Your facing two federal goverments plus state and local, all coordinating before you even know your being investigated.

The busiest land border crossing in the Western Hemisphere isnt just geography. Its prosecutorial advantage. And if you dont understand what that means for your case, your already behind.

The Geography That Became a Weapon

San Diego sits at the intersection of three prosecution ecosystems that dont exist together anywhere else in the country. You’ve got the Tijuana border – specifically the San Ysidro Port of Entry, which processes more then 50,000 northbound vehicle passengers daily and another 25,000 pedestrians. Thats the busiest land border crossing in the entire Western Hemisphere. Every single day.

Then you’ve got the largest concentration of Navy assets in the world. Naval Base San Diego, Naval Air Station North Island, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, Naval Base Coronado. Were talking about massive federal contracting, defense procurement, billions of dollars flowing through military logistics and support operations. That brings Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS), Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS), and military investigative resources that other districts simply dont have in the same concentration.

And then you’ve got the Pacific Ocean, which means maritime smuggling operations, cross-border tunnel networks connecting San Diego to Tijuana, and coastal trafficking routes that require Coast Guard coordination.

Most federal districts have one of these elements. San Diego has all three, simultaneously, creating prosecution infrastructure that’s imposible to replicate in Omaha or Atlanta or even other border cities. The geography isnt neutral. Its a weapon prosecutors in Iowa or Montana could never deploy.

Here’s the kicker – that concentration of federal law enforcement resources created permanent task force structures. The agencies didnt just show up for one case and leave. They built Joint facilities. They established ongoing coordination. They created information-sharing protocols that became institutional. By the time your case starts, the prosecution machine has been running for years. There already coordinating. Your starting from zero.

Nineteen Agencies, One Target: You

OK so lets talk about what your actualy facing when federal charges come down in San Diego. The Border Enforcement Security Task Forces – BEST teams – were created by Homeland Security Investigations to coordinate border prosecutions. In San Diego, the BEST task force includes representitives from:

Federal: FBI, DEA, ATF, ICE/HSI, CBP, U.S. Marshals Service, IRS Criminal Investigation, DCIS, NCIS, Coast Guard Investigative Service, Secret Service, Postal Inspection Service

State: California Department of Justice, California Highway Patrol

Local: San Diego Police Department, San Diego Sheriff’s Department, San Diego Harbor Police

Mexican: Elements from Mexican federal law enforcement coordinating through binational agreements

Thats nineteen different agencies with investigators assigned to the same task force, meeting regularly, sharing intelligence, and building cases together. When one agency develops a lead, all nineteen have access to it. When wiretap evidence comes in, it gets disseminated across the entire task force. When your arrested, multiple agencies have already been tracking you.

Compare that to a federal case in, say, the Northern District of Iowa. You might face the FBI and one other agency. In San Diego, your facing a coordinated prosecution team thats been operating together for years, with resources defendants cant possibly match. The asymetry isnt just unfair – its designed to be overwhelming.

And heres the part most defense attorneys outside San Diego dont fully appreciate: the Mexican coordination. San Diego federal prosecutors regulary coordinate with Mexican federal law enforcement before unsealing indictments. U.S. Attorneys in the Southern District of California work with Mexicos Fiscalía General de la República (FGR) on binational prosecution strategies. That means while your being investigated in the United States, parallel investigations might be running in Mexico. Family members south of the border. Business operations in Tijuana. Assets in Mexican banks.

Your attorney in San Diego needs to understand that your not just defending against a U.S. indictment. Your defending against a prosecution strategy that might include Mexican law enforcement pressure on your family or business intrests that never appears in any court filing.

But wait – someone might argue that every border district has multi-agency cooperation. El Paso handles border cases. Laredo handles border cases. Tucson prosecutes drug trafficking. This isnt unique to San Diego, right?

Heres were volume and coordination seperate San Diego from everywhere else. San Diego handles the busiest crossing in the hemisphere. The sheer number of daily border interactions creates investigative opportunities other districts dont have. And the 19-agency BEST coordination in San Diego includes formal Mexican law enforcement participation at a level that doesnt exist in Texas or Arizona border districts. Research from UCSD’s Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies documents that San Diego serves as a testing ground for coordinated border prosecution strategies that later get deployed to other districts. Your not facing standard border prosecution. Your facing the experimental version before it becomes standard everywhere else.

The Pressure That Never Appears in Court Filings

Now lets talk about the informal leverage prosecutors in San Diego can deploy. This is were it gets uncomfortable, becuase these tactics dont show up in indictments or sentencing memos. But practitioners know they exist.

Immigration status. If your family members are in the United States on any kind of visa – work authorization, student visas, pending adjustment of status, even green card holders who’ve been here for decades – that status becomes relevant during cooperation discussions. Federal prosecutors in San Diego can mention, casualy, that immigration enforcement might look into a family members situation. They dont threaten directly. They just make you aware that Immigration and Customs Enforcement is part of the same task force. And that cooperation in your case could influence weather anyone looks closely at your wifes visa overstay or your brothers employment authorization.

Business operations in Mexico. Lets say you own a business in Tijuana, or your family does. Completly legal operations – import/export, manufacturing, retail, whatever. During proffer sessions or cooperation negotiations, prosecutors might mention that Mexican law enforcement has expressed intrest in certain businesses. Not a formal investigation. Just “awareness.” And cooperation with U.S. prosecutors might influence weather that interest goes anywhere.

You cant fight this in court. Theres no motion to suppress informal pressure. Your attorney cant file a brief arguing that the prosecutors threat to have Mexican authorities look into your family business violates your rights, becuase the prosecutor never made a formal threat. They just mentioned a possibility. During a conversation. That wasnt recorded.

A former Assistant U.S. Attorney who worked in San Diego mentioned in a professional forum that San Diego prosecutors have “more levers to pull than anywhere else” – immigration consequences, Mexican coordination, military jurisdiction for cases involving servicemembers or contractors. That quote didnt come from a press release. It came from a practitioner describing the reality of San Diego federal prosecution. Its asymetric warfare. The prosecution has weapons you cant deploy, cant challenge in court, and sometimes cant even prove exist.

And then theres the deportation leverage. Even if you yourself are a U.S. citizen and cant be deported, family members might not have the same status. The implicit threat – never stated directly, always just implied – is that cooperation matters for more than just your sentencing guidelines. It matters for weather ICE decides to prioritize your uncle who’s been here for thirty years but never adjusted status. Or your sister who overstayed a tourist visa in 2015. The connections exist within the same task force structure. And everyone involved knows it.

The beautiful geography that makes San Diego attractive – the ocean, the border, the perfect weather, the military presence – creates prosecution advantages that make federal cases there more dangerous then anywhere else in the country.

What Happens When the Laboratory Runs Your Case

Lets get concrete about what these prosecution advantages actualy produce. Not abstract discussion of multi-agency coordination. Real cases. Real sentences. Real consequences when all nineteen agencies focus on one target.

Cross-border tunnel cases. San Diego handles sophisticated drug trafficking tunnel prosecutions that literaly dont exist anywhere else. These arent crude holes in the ground. Were talking about engineered structures – reinforced walls, ventilation systems, rail systems for moving product, electrical lighting, hydraulic entrances disguised under buildings. Some tunnels run half a mile from Tijuana warehouses to San Diego warehouses. The engineering alone costs millions.

When Border Patrol or HSI discovers a tunnel, the entire BEST task force activates. U.S. agencies coordinate with Mexican federal police. They identify everyone involved on both sides of the border. And then the prosecution happens binationaly – the U.S. indicts operators on the American side while Mexico prosecutes operators on the Mexican side. Your family members in Tijuana might face Mexican charges while you face 30 to 40 years in U.S. federal prison.

The sentencing in tunnel cases reflects the multi-agency coordination. Sophisticated means of importation. Leadership role in continuing criminal enterprise. Conspiracy counts that capture years of operation. Massive drug quantity attributions based on tunnel capacity even if you didnt personaly move all that product. The guidelines calculations that result from coordinated multi-agency investigations produce sentences that would be lower if the case were prosecuted by a single agency with less resources.

Navy contractor fraud cases show the same pattern in a completly different context. San Diego has massive defense contracting becuase of the military presence. Procurement fraud, cost mischarging, product substitution schemes involving Navy contracts. When DCIS opens an investigation into contractor billing irregularities, they bring in the FBI for fraud expertise and IRS Criminal Investigation for financial analysis. Three federal agencies building one case.

The defendant – maybe a small business owner who didnt fully understand FAR (Federal Acquisition Regulation) compliance requirements – suddenly faces a prosecution team that includes DCIS agents who know defense contracting, FBI agents who specialize in financial fraud, and IRS-CI agents who’ve traced every dollar through multiple bank accounts and corporate entities. The resource disparity is crushing. What might have been negotiated as a civil False Claims Act settlement in another district becomes a twenty-year federal prison exposure in San Diego becuase the multi-agency coordination makes the criminal case airtight.

A recent case involved a Navy maintenance contractor who allegedly substituted unauthorized parts in submarine components. DCIS initiated, FBI joined for fraud analysis, NCIS contributed becuase it involved submarine safety. The prosecution presented evidence from three agencies that had been investigating for eighteen months before the indictment was unsealed. By the time the defendant knew he was under investigation, the government had already interviewed forty witnesses, reviewed thousands of documents, and built a case that his defense attorney described as “impossible to overcome.” He pled guilty and recieved fifteen years.

That’s what happens when the prosecution laboratory runs your case. Every advantage combines. Every agency contributes. And your facing a coordinated machine that’s been testing these tactics for years.

Think about what that means if your the defendant. Your not facing one AUSA with a case file. Your facing a prosecution team supported by nineteen agencies that have been coordinating on border and military cases for a decade. They’ve refined their strategies. They know what works. They’ve built institutional knowledge about what types of evidence federal judges in the Southern District of California find persuasive. Your defense attorney, even if experienced, is starting from scratch on your specific case. The prosecutors have been building expertise on these case types for years.

What You Actualy Need in San Diego Federal Court

After everything Ive described – the 19-agency coordination, the binational prosecution strategies, the informal leverage through immigration and Mexican law enforcement, the tunnel cases and Navy fraud showing what happens when all advantages combine – you might be wondering what actualy works. What can defense counsel do against this system?

First, you need an attorney who understands that San Diego federal cases arent like federal cases anywhere else. The multi-agency structure matters. The Mexican coordination matters. The immigration leverage matters. An attorney who’s handled federal cases in other districts but never worked in San Diego might not fully appreciate the informal pressure prosecutors can bring. Experience in the Southern District of California specifically is critical.

Second, early intervention before charges are filed can sometimes prevent the prosecution from moving forward. If your being investigated but havent been indicted yet, an experienced federal attorney can sometimes communicate with the AUSA, present mitigating information, and shape the case before nineteen agencies have all committed resources. Once BEST task force resources are deployed and multiple agencies are invested, the momentum toward indictment becomes almost imposible to stop. But before that point, theres sometimes room for negotiation.

Third, understanding the binational dimension is essential if you have any connections to Mexico. Family there. Business intrests there. Assets there. Your attorney needs to anticipate that Mexican law enforcement coordination might create pressure points that dont exist in cases prosecuted in Kansas or Ohio. Protecting against informal leverage requires understanding it exists in the first place.

Fourth, cooperation strategy in San Diego is different becuase of the multi-agency structure. If your going to cooperate, you need to provide information valuable to multiple agencies – not just the lead agency on your case. An attorney who understands how BEST task forces operate can sometimes position cooperation to benefit from the multi-agency structure rather then just being crushed by it. But that requires sophisticated understanding of what each agency wants and how task force politics work.

Todd Spodek and the team at Spodek Law Group have handled federal cases across multiple districts, including complex cases involving multi-agency coordination and cross-border elements. We understand that San Diego federal prosecution isnt routine. Its experimental. Your facing tactics that other districts havent adopted yet. Your facing informal leverage that never appears in court filings. Your facing resource advantages that cant be matched.

If your under investigation or facing charges in San Diego’s Southern District of California, dont wait for the 19-agency machine to finish building the case. Call 212-300-5196 for a consultation. We’ll give you an honest assessment of what your facing and what your options actualy are.

This is serious. The geography matters. The coordination matters. The informal leverage matters. Treat it that way.

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile

RALPH P. FRANCO, JR

Associate

view profile

JEREMY FEIGENBAUM

Associate Attorney

view profile

ELIZABETH GARVEY

Associate

view profile

CLAIRE BANKS

Associate

view profile

RAJESH BARUA

Of-Counsel

view profile

CHAD LEWIN

Of-Counsel

view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now