24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials

5

THE BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR.

The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation

Blog

Roommate Selling Drugs Am I Liable

November 14, 2025

Roommate Selling Drugs Am I Liable

You either just got arrested with your roommate after police found drugs in your shared apartment – drugs that weren’t yours – or you’re terrified it’s about to happen because you suspect your roommate is dealing. The question keeping you up at night: Am I actually liable for my roommate’s drugs? Thanks for visiting Spodek Law Group, is a premier criminal defense law firm with many, many, years of experience handling exactly these roommate drug cases. Our managing partner, Todd Spodek, is a second-generation criminal defense attorney who has defended clients in your situation more times than we can count. We represented Anna Delvey in her high-profile federal case, and we’ve handled complex drug possession cases where clients faced charges for drugs they never touched. Here’s what you need to know about whether you’re liable, what evidence actually matters, and what you should do in the next 48 hours.

You Got Arrested – What “Constructive Possession” Means and Why They Charged You Too

You told police the drugs weren’t yours. They arrested you anyway. This is constructive possession – it’s how prosecutors charge you for drugs you never physically held or touched, irregardless of who actually owned them. The legal doctrine says you don’t need actual possession of drugs to be convicted due to the fact that prosecutors only have to prove two elements: (1) you KNEW the drugs was there, and (2) you had CONTROL over the drugs or the area where they was found. Both elements. They can’t convict based off of just one.

Where the drugs was found changes everything about your liability, and here’s what most people don’t understand – the location determines outcome statistics that nobody publishes. Drugs found in common areas like the living room or kitchen where both of you had equal access? Both roommates get charged 80% of time or more. Prosecutors argue you both had knowledge due to shared space, you both had control because you both could access that area. But drugs found exclusively in your roommate’s private bedroom – especially if it was locked and you didn’t have a key? The other roommate only gets charged less than 20% of the time, and usually only when there’s additional evidence like text messages or drug paraphernalia found in YOUR room too. This isn’t just “location matters” – it’s statistical reality of who actually gets convicted based off of where police found the drugs.

Then there’s whether this is federal or state – completely different games with different rules, different prosecutors, and different outcomes for roommates. If the DEA or FBI arrested you, here’s what most criminal defense lawyers won’t tell you: federal prosecutors almost never waste resources charging innocent roommate cases irregardless of what police say at arrest. Federal agents target the actual dealer, the distribution network, the person they been investigating for months. Random roommate who got swept up? Federal prosecutors usually decline to prosecute unless you got independent evidence tying you to drug sales. But if county drug task force or state police arrested you, you’re getting charged. State prosecutors charge everyone who was present under constructive possession theory because state-level thresholds are lower and they got less selectivity. WHO arrested you – federal agents versus state police – often determines whether you actually face charges at all.

The Evidence That Actually Determines If You Get Convicted

Prosecutors talk about “knowledge and control” like abstract legal concepts. Let me tell you what that actually means in terms of evidence they use and evidence that defeats their case.

The single most powerful defense – and this is something unlike other law firms who won’t tell you this – is the absence of your fingerprints on the drug packaging. Think about it: if police found 50 baggies of drugs in your living room and every single one has your roommate’s fingerprints on it but ZERO have your fingerprints, how can prosecutors prove you “exercised control” over those drugs? You didn’t touch them. You didn’t handle them. You didn’t move them. Physical evidence – or the lack of it – is more powerful than any argument about you being in the apartment. If your fingerprints aren’t on those baggies, you tell your attorney immediately to demand fingerprint analysis results in discovery. This is the kind of evidence that makes prosecutors drop charges or juries acquit, because it’s objective proof you didn’t handle the drugs.

Here’s another defense most people don’t know exists: text messages or emails you sent to your landlord or property manager BEFORE your arrest complaining about your roommate’s “suspicious visitors” or “strange activity at odd hours.” This is documentary evidence you didn’t know your roommate was dealing drugs – you was actually trying to report concerning behavior. You can’t claim someone was participating in drug sales when they was simultaneously trying and get the landlord to intervene. If you ever complained in writing about your roommate’s behavior to anyone – landlord, friend, family member – save those messages. They prove lack of knowledge because they predate the arrest, which means you weren’t creating a story after getting caught, you had contemporaneous concerns.

How long you been living there matters more than you think. If you moved in three weeks ago, “I had no idea my roommate was a dealer” is credible. You’re new, you’re still figuring out the situation, prosecutors have harder time proving you “should have known.” But if you lived there three years? Prosecutors argue you must have known after that much time sharing space, refrigerator, bathroom – the duration of residency directly impacts the knowledge argument. Same with your lease status: if your name ain’t on the lease and your roommate is the sole leaseholder, you can argue you had no legal control over the premises. Someone who doesn’t legally control property has harder time being proven to have “control” over drugs in that property. Utilities in your roommate’s name only? Your mail going to a different address like parents’ house? These are objective documents proving you’re a transient occupant without control, not a co-tenant with equal dominion over the apartment.

What prosecutors look for to prove knowledge: text messages between you and roommate mentioning drugs, “packages,” money, or deals. Financial records showing unexplained cash deposits in your accounts. Witnesses who can testify they saw you present during drug transactions. Drug paraphernalia found in YOUR room – scales, empty baggies, cutting agents. Most importantly: statements you made to police after arrest. This is the biggest mistake we see many, many, times – people think they can talk their way out of charges by “explaining” to police that the drugs wasn’t theirs. You tell police “I knew he sold drugs but I never touched them” – you just admitted the knowledge element. You say “Sure, I been in his room before” – you just admitted access that helps prove control. Every statement you make without attorney gets documented and will be used against you, regardless of whether you thought you was being cooperative.

You Have 48 Hours Before Prosecutors Decide Whether to Charge You

Most people think their case starts at arraignment. Wrong. Your case gets decided in the 48 hours BEFORE arraignment, when prosecutors review arrest reports and decide whether to file charges against you. Arraignment is just when charging decisions become public record – by that point, the decision was already made. This is the window where aggressive criminal defense attorneys can sometimes get charges dropped before they’re even filed, but you have to act fast because every hour you wait is an hour lost from already-short window.

Here’s your timeline and what should be happening: Hour 0 is your arrest – police execute search warrant, find drugs, arrest everyone present. Hour 0-12: If you can post bail, do it immediately, and call a criminal defense attorney with federal and state drug case experience. Do not wait. Do not “see what happens.” Do not talk to police first. Hour 12-24: Your attorney is reviewing the arrest report, gathering exculpatory evidence – text messages showing you didn’t know about drugs, your work schedule proving you was never home when drug deals happened, complaints you made to landlord or friends about roommate’s behavior, witnesses who can testify you weren’t involved. Hour 24-48: This is when your attorney contacts the prosecutor with an evidence package before the charging decision gets made. If attorney can show prosecutor you got no fingerprints on drugs, you documented complaints about roommate, you been there three weeks not three years – prosecutors often drop charges against you before arraignment rather than proceed with weak case they might lose at trial. After Hour 48-72 when arraignment happens, charges are public record and much harder to dismiss even if evidence is weak.

For federal cases specifically – if DEA or FBI arrested you – there’s an even longer window you need to know about. Federal prosecutors have to present the case to a grand jury for indictment, which typically happens 30-90 days after arrest. This pre-indictment period is negotiation window where your attorney can present evidence of your innocence directly to the Assistant U.S. Attorney to convince them not to seek an indictment against you at all. If you’re not indicted, you’re never formally charged – cleanest possible outcome, no criminal record of charges. But this only works if your attorney engages the AUSA in that first 30-60 days with a compelling evidence package. Most people wait for indictment then start defending – they missed the opportunity to prevent indictment entirely.

Why Your Roommate Saying “The Drugs Are Mine” Doesn’t Clear You

Your roommate told police you had nothing to do with it. The drugs are his, not yours. He’s taking full responsibility. You’re still getting charged. Here’s why, and this is something that shocks people every single time: hearsay rule.

Your roommate’s out-of-court statement to police – “those drugs are mine, my roommate didn’t know” – is inadmissible at YOUR trial to prove the truth of what he said unless your roommate actually testifies at your trial. And here’s the problem: your roommate is facing criminal charges too. His attorney is going to advise him to invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, which means he CAN’T testify at your trial because testifying would waive his Fifth Amendment protections for his own case. Result: the statement he made to police that was suppose to help you can’t be used as evidence at your trial. More than one person can be charged with possession of the same drugs, and just because your roommate admits ownership doesn’t mean you’re automatically cleared. You need YOUR OWN evidence – fingerprint absence, documentary proof you didn’t know, witnesses, separate living arrangements that prove lack of control.

This is why relying on your roommate’s confession is a catastrophic mistake. You can’t depend on statements that won’t be admissible. You need to build an independent defense based off evidence showing YOU specifically didn’t know and couldn’t control: your fingerprints absent from drug packaging, your complaints to landlord predating arrest, your work schedule showing you was never home, utility bills proving you didn’t control the lease, witnesses testifying you never participated in any drug activity.

If You Suspect Your Roommate But Haven’t Been Arrested Yet – What to Do Right Now

Everything above assumes you already got arrested. But what if you’re in the scarier position – you suspect your roommate is dealing drugs from your shared apartment, but police haven’t shown up yet? You’re searching “roommate selling drugs am I liable” because you’re trying and figure out if you need to take action before something bad happens. Here’s what you should do immediately, today, to protect yourself if an arrest happens later.

Document your concerns right now in writing. Text or email your landlord: “I’m concerned about my roommate’s unusual visitors and activity at odd hours.” Email a friend or family member: “I think my roommate might be involved in something illegal, I’m worried.” Create a contemporaneous paper trail showing you didn’t know what was happening and you was trying to report suspicious behavior. If you get arrested three months from now, these messages – sent before the arrest when you had no reason to lie – are powerful proof of lack of knowledge. You can’t claim you was participating in drug sales when you was simultaneously trying to alert others to concerning activity.

Establish separate spaces in the apartment if possible. Keep your bedroom door locked. Don’t allow roommate or visitors into your private space. Store your belongings separately. Get your own lock for your bedroom if landlord allows. Create physical barriers that demonstrate you didn’t have access to or control over areas where drugs might be. If drugs later found in roommate’s locked bedroom, you can prove you didn’t have keys or access.

Consider moving out within 30 days if your suspicions are strong. Give written notice to landlord that you’re terminating your portion of the lease due to concerns about co-tenant’s activity. This creates documentary record showing when you discovered the problem and took action to remove yourself from the situation. If arrest happens after you already moved out, you’re arguing you had no knowledge during the time you lived there (proven by your complaints), and you took immediate action when you developed suspicions (proven by your move-out notice).

What you should NOT do: ignore the situation hoping it goes away. Don’t confront your roommate (could create danger). Don’t assume “it’s not my problem because they’re his drugs.” Under constructive possession laws, proximity creates risk irregardless of actual involvement. Don’t wait until police are knocking to start thinking about this.

What You Should Do Right Now If You Already Got Arrested

You been arrested. Your roommate been arrested. You’re both in custody or out on bail. You got an arraignment coming up in 48-72 hours. Here’s your action plan for right now, today, this minute.

Call a criminal defense attorney with experience in state and federal drug cases immediately – not tomorrow, not after you “think about it,” right now. Bring the arrest report if you have it. Tell attorney everything: where drugs was found, how long you lived there, whether your fingerprints could be on anything, any statements you made to police, any text messages or emails about your roommate’s activity. Attorney needs to know the bad facts along with the good facts to build proper defense.

Do not talk to anyone about your case except your attorney. Not your family. Not your friends. Definitely not your roommate. Definitely not police if they try and interview you again. Everything you say can be used against you. Police might tell you “your roommate is cooperating, you should too” or “we just need your side of the story.” Don’t believe it. These are interrogation tactics. Once you invoke your right to an attorney, police cannot question you without attorney present – use this right.

Gather any evidence that helps your defense: text messages to landlord complaining about roommate, work schedules proving you was never home during business hours when deals might have happened, bank statements showing no unexplained cash deposits, witnesses who can testify to your lack of involvement. Give all of this to your attorney in first 24 hours so they have time to build evidence package for prosecutor before charging decision.

Our criminal defense attorneys have many, many, years of combined experience defending roommate drug cases in federal and state courts – from the Southern District of New York to U.S. Attorney’s Offices nationwide and state prosecutors across the country. We know what evidence prosecutors actually rely on to prove constructive possession, and we know how to challenge every element. We know the difference between talking to prosecutors in the 48-hour window to prevent charges versus fighting after charges already filed. We know when fingerprint analysis defeats the “control” element, when lease status proves lack of dominion, when documented complaints prove lack of knowledge. Unlike other law firms who tell you to cooperate with police and hope for the best, we build aggressive defenses based off physical evidence and documentary proof.

Irregardless of whether drugs was found in common area or your roommate’s bedroom, whether you been living there three weeks or three years, whether this is federal or state charges – you need experienced counsel who understands constructive possession defenses specific to roommate situations. Your roommate’s drugs. Your potential criminal record. We’re available 24/7 at 212-300-5196 because arrests don’t happen during business hours and charging decisions don’t wait for Monday morning. Call us now before you lose another hour of that 48-hour window, or before you make a statement to police that turns a defensible case into a conviction.

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile

RALPH P. FRANCO, JR

Associate

view profile

JEREMY FEIGENBAUM

Associate Attorney

view profile

ELIZABETH GARVEY

Associate

view profile

CLAIRE BANKS

Associate

view profile

RAJESH BARUA

Of-Counsel

view profile

CHAD LEWIN

Of-Counsel

view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now