Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 19th October 2023, 07:50 pm
When we think of the law, we often think of these landmark Supreme Court cases that set precedents and have a huge impact. But what about all those other cases that don’t make it to the Supreme Court? The ones heard in local courts every day? These are called representative cases, and they matter too!
A representative case is basically any case that represents a common legal issue. These cases usually don’t set precedents, but they allow the common law to develop and change over time. Let’s take a look at some examples of representative cases and why they’re important:
Most criminal cases actually fall under state law, not federal. And most of the cases that come through local courts are relatively minor crimes – petty theft, drunk driving, simple assault. But for the people involved, these cases impact their daily lives and futures. So the outcomes really matter to them.
For example, say Paul is arrested for shoplifting a $15 bottle of wine from the corner store. The store owner decides to press charges. This is a minor crime, but the case still deserves thoughtful consideration. The judge and lawyers have to weigh factors like: Is this Paul’s first offense? Why did he steal – does he have a drug or alcohol problem? Should he get jail time or a fine and probation? Representative cases like these may not set precedents, but they allow the law to adapt and judges to consider individual circumstances.
Small claims court handles civil cases disputes under a certain dollar amount – usually $5,000 to $25,000, depending on the state. These include issues like:
Again, these cases impact people’s everyday lives. Say your landlord refuses to return your safety deposit, or a mechanic overcharged you for repairs. Small claims court gives the average person a way to resolve these disputes without hiring expensive lawyers. The cases may not set precedents, but the outcomes matter for those involved. Judges have to carefully consider the evidence and make fair rulings.
Family court deals with sensitive issues like divorce, child custody, spousal and child support. Each case is unique and requires thoughtful consideration of the people involved – their situations, needs, relationships. Family court judges need wisdom and discernment to make rulings that are fair and compassionate.
For instance, two parents may be divorcing and disputing custody of their young daughter. The judge hears testimony from both sides – the parents, child psychologists, teachers, family members – to understand the full context. These details matter. The judge considers factors like the child’s age, her relationship with each parent, their parenting abilities and lifestyles. The goal is a custody arrangement that serves the child’s best interests. This representative case deeply impacts a family’s future.
Even though representative cases don’t make headlines, they’re crucial for several reasons:
Most cases will never advance to higher courts. But paying attention to the details and ruling fairly on these representative cases is how local judges put justice into action. These cases may not make headlines, but they sustain the living practice of law in our communities.
Just like in high-profile cases, defendants in representative cases can raise various defenses. The details of each small case dictate what defenses might apply. Here are some examples:
If a defendant is charged with assault or battery, they may claim they acted in self-defense. This means using reasonable force to protect oneself from harm. For example, Steve gets in a fight with a man who aggressively confronts him at a bar. Steve could argue he threw the first punch to prevent the man from hurting him further.
This is the argument that mental illness prevented the defendant from understanding their actions or knowing right from wrong. This rarely succeeds, since the mental illness must be severe. But it has worked in some representative criminal cases involving delusions.
Also called the “choice of evils defense.” The defendant admits to breaking the law, but argues they had to in order to prevent immediate harm. For instance, a dad speeding to get his sick child to the ER may cite necessity if pulled over.
In this defense, the defendant says they were forced to break the law by the threat of violence. So they had no realistic choice but to comply. This could apply if a member of a crime ring claims they participated only because the leader threatened their family.
This argues that too much time has passed between the alleged crime and the charges being filed. Every crime has a “statute of limitations” – a deadline for prosecution. In many states this may be 3-6 years for common crimes. The purpose is to ensure a timely trial when evidence is still fresh.
While these defenses originate in higher courts, skilled lawyers also apply them effectively in representative cases. The details always matter – was the action truly self-defense or necessity? The evidence must support the claim. But raising an applicable defense can lead to reduced charges or even dismissal in small cases.
Here are some key points on representative cases:
While Supreme Court cases understandably get more attention, we can’t overlook the importance of representative cases. They may not set precedents, but they impact real people in lasting ways. Our justice system depends on judges and lawyers taking each case seriously, considering the circumstances, and applying the law in a reasonable way. Paying attention to the details matters – not just in high courts, but everyday local cases.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.