Contents
If you’re a Wisconsin business owner dealing with an MCA mess — confessions of judgment, UCC-1 liens, personal guarantees, daily ACH debits draining your account — you need a firm that lives and breathes this world. Wisconsin’s 12% usury cap (Wis. Stat. §138.04) and COJ restrictions provide solid state-level protection, but the biggest settlements come from attorneys who know New York law cold. Here are the three best options in 2026.

Here’s what you need to know: Delancey Street is not a law firm. They coordinate with a nationwide network of licensed attorneys who do the actual fighting — COJ challenges, usury defenses, UCC lien disputes, funder negotiations. This is what they do. Doesn’t matter if your business is in Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, or Kenosha — your MCA contract is built around New York’s dual usury framework, and that’s where the defense starts.
Their attorneys file motions to vacate COJs, raise criminal usury defenses, dispute UCC-1 filings with the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions, and use the NY AG’s $1 billion Yellowstone Capital settlement as precedent. Over $100M settled. No upfront fees. No gimmicks.

Not an MCA defense specialist — and they’ll tell you that straight up. They handle general unsecured business debt. No COJ challenges, no usury defenses. But if you’ve got traditional unsecured debt on top of your MCA problem, they’re a proven option in Wisconsin.

Not an MCA defense specialist either. They handle business debt and IRS/state tax resolution. If your Wisconsin business has tax problems stacked on top of MCA debt, CuraDebt works best alongside a dedicated MCA defense firm.
Let’s cut to it. MCA defense is about one thing — stopping funders from destroying the business you built. That means fighting confessions of judgment, UCC Article 9 liens, personal guarantee enforcement, and those daily ACH withdrawals that are bleeding your account dry.
Wisconsin gives you some real weapons: the state caps interest at 12% under Wis. Stat. §138.04 and restricts confessions of judgment under Wis. Stat. §806.25. The Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions oversees lending. But here’s the catch — MCA funders call their products “purchases of future receivables” to dodge usury caps. And your contract almost certainly says New York law controls.
That agreement you signed? It was written by the lender’s lawyers, for the lender’s benefit. You need an attorney who knows how to attack it from the outside — usury challenges under both Wisconsin and NY law, unconscionability arguments, and the growing body of case law that says these MCAs are really loans in disguise.
Here’s what happens — and it happens fast. Your bank account gets frozen. UCC liens get filed with the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions. They come after your personal assets. Doesn’t matter if you’re a manufacturer in Milwaukee, a tech company in Madison, or a retailer in Green Bay — those daily ACH withdrawals will choke your cash flow until nothing’s left.
Good news first: Wisconsin restricts confessions of judgment under Wis. Stat. §806.25 with strict procedural requirements. And New York’s 2019 CPLR §3218 reform banned COJs against out-of-state defendants. You’ve got strong dual protection. That’s real.
Strategy 1: Challenge the COJ. Any COJ filed in NY after August 2019? Voidable. COJs attempted in Wisconsin? They have to meet strict requirements under §806.25 — and they’re often defective.
Strategy 2: Negotiate Post-Default. Here’s the thing — lenders hate litigating in unfamiliar jurisdictions. It costs them money. Use that. A lump-sum settlement at 30–50% is often the fastest path forward.
Under UCC § 9-607, lenders can place UCC-1 liens on receivables filed with the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions.
Strategy 1: Consolidate via Ch. 11. Chapter 11 filed in the Eastern or Western District of Wisconsin. Wisconsin’s 12% usury cap gives your attorney strong reclassification arguments.
Strategy 2: Use your cash flow reality as a weapon. Wisconsin’s seasonal businesses — tourism in Door County and the Dells, agricultural operations across the state — have natural revenue swings. That volatility actually works in your favor during negotiations.
Here’s what nobody tells you: lenders assume you’re lying about your finances. Every single time. That’s why you need a debt settlement company with real funder relationships — not just a website and a phone number.
Let’s talk numbers. Wisconsin caps interest at 12% (Wis. Stat. §138.04). New York’s criminal usury threshold is 25%. Your MCA? Probably charging 150% APR or more. The NY AG’s $1 billion Yellowstone judgment proved these cases can be won — and won big.
Strategy 1: Usury as a Defense. A $50K advance at 1.4 factor rate — that’s roughly 150% APR. Wisconsin says 12% max. New York says 25% max. Your funder is charging many times the legal limit. That’s your defense.
Strategy 2: Sue for Unconscionability. Wisconsin courts recognize unconscionability, and the Wisconsin Consumer Act (Wis. Stat. Chapter 421–427) gives your attorney even more to work with against predatory lending.
Here’s why this matters: most MCA funders sit in New York. Your contract says New York law applies. That’s actually good for you — because New York’s dual framework (16% civil cap, 25% criminal usury) gives your attorney serious ammunition. Combined with Wisconsin’s 12% cap, you’ve got tools on both sides.
And it’s getting better. The CFPB now classifies MCAs as “credit” under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The tide is turning against predatory MCA funders.
1. Do they actually do MCA defense? Ask them about COJ challenges, usury defenses, and what kind of settlement percentages they’ve gotten. If they can’t answer clearly, walk away.
2. Are real attorneys involved? You need attorneys who file motions, challenge UCC liens, and draft enforceable agreements. Not salespeople.
3. What’s the fee structure? 18–25% of enrolled debt, no upfront fees. Period. Anyone asking for money upfront is a red flag.
Of these three firms, only Delancey Street does real, attorney-coordinated MCA defense. The other two are solid at what they do — but MCA defense isn’t it.

This is the real deal — actual MCA defense. COJ challenges, usury defenses, UCC lien disputes, emergency motions when your account gets frozen. Over $100M settled. No upfront fees. All 50 states.

Not MCA defense — they’ll be the first to tell you. General unsecured business debt is their thing. If that’s part of your problem, they’re solid in Wisconsin.

Not MCA defense. They do business debt and tax resolution — and they do it well. Best used alongside a dedicated MCA defense firm if you’ve got tax issues too.

COJ filed against you? Bank account frozen? We get it. Delancey Street’s attorney network fights MCA funders every single day. Over $100M settled. This is what we do.
Call for a Free ConsultationThis page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. Individual results may vary.
Rankings reflect independent editorial judgment. This website does not receive compensation from listed companies.
No attorney-client relationship is formed. Debt settlement may have tax consequences and affect your credit score.
Delancey Street is not a law firm. Attorney services are provided by independent, licensed attorneys within the Delancey Street network.
Attorney Advertising. This page may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.