If you're a Philly business owner dealing with an MCA mess — confessions of judgment, UCC-1 liens, personal guarantees, daily ACH debits draining your account — you need a firm that lives and breathes this world. Philadelphia's unique COJ procedures under Pa.R.C.P. 2950–2959 require specialized knowledge. Here are the three best options in 2026.

Here's what you need to know: Delancey Street is not a law firm. They coordinate with a nationwide network of licensed attorneys who do the actual fighting — COJ challenges in both Pennsylvania and New York courts, usury defenses under both states' laws, UCC lien disputes, and funder negotiations for Philadelphia business owners. Pennsylvania's COJ provisions make attorney representation essential for Philly businesses.
What separates them from every other firm is MCA-specific legal firepower. Their attorneys file petitions to open or strike confessions of judgment in Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, raise criminal usury defenses when effective APRs exceed 25% under New York law or 6% under Pennsylvania's non-licensed lender cap, dispute overbroad UCC-1 filings with the Pennsylvania Department of State, and use the Yellowstone Capital settlement as precedent. Over $100M settled. No upfront fees. This is what they do.

Not an MCA defense specialist — and they'll tell you that straight up. Handles general unsecured business debts but doesn't challenge COJs, file usury defenses, or dispute UCC liens. Solid option for traditional unsecured business debt if that's your situation.

Not an MCA defense specialist either. CuraDebt handles business debt and IRS/state tax resolution — they've been doing it for over 25 years. If your situation involves both MCA debt and Pennsylvania Department of Revenue or IRS obligations, they can handle the tax side while a firm like Delancey Street handles the MCA fight.
Let's cut to it. MCA defense is about one thing — stopping funders from destroying the business you built. They use confessions of judgment, UCC Article 9 liens, personal guarantee enforcement, and aggressive daily ACH withdrawals. Philadelphia business owners face a uniquely dangerous situation because Pennsylvania is one of the few states that still permits confessions of judgment under Pa.R.C.P. 2950–2959. That means funders can file COJs in both Pennsylvania courts AND New York courts — two avenues to freeze your accounts.
Philadelphia's small business community spans healthcare, education-adjacent services, hospitality, construction, and professional services. These businesses face high operating costs and seasonal fluctuations that make them vulnerable to MCA predation. When daily ACH debits consume 15–25% of revenue, a Center City restaurant or a Northeast Philadelphia contractor can go from profitable to insolvent within weeks.
The MCA agreement you signed almost certainly designates New York as the governing jurisdiction — but the COJ clause may also be enforceable in Pennsylvania courts. You need an attorney who knows both jurisdictions: New York's usury framework and Pennsylvania's COJ procedures and its own extremely low 6% usury cap for non-licensed lenders.
Here's what happens — and it happens fast. The moment your Philadelphia business misses an MCA payment, the funder has two fast-track collection options: filing a COJ in Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas under Pa.R.C.P. 2950–2959, or filing a COJ in New York County Supreme Court. Both can result in immediate account freezes without notice.
The 2019 CPLR §3218 reform gives you partial protection: COJ enforcement against out-of-state defendants in New York is now banned. But because Pennsylvania still permits COJs, funders can file directly in Pennsylvania courts — making Philadelphia one of the most vulnerable cities for MCA defaults in the country.
Here's the reality for Philadelphia: unlike most other cities where the 2019 CPLR §3218 reform neutralized COJs, you still face the risk of COJ filing in Pennsylvania courts. Pennsylvania's Pa.R.C.P. 2950–2959 governs COJ enforcement — but it also imposes strict procedural requirements that your attorney can use.
Strategy 1: File a Petition to Open or Strike the Judgment. Pennsylvania allows defendants to file a petition to open the judgment (showing a meritorious defense) or strike the judgment (showing procedural defects). Common grounds: the COJ was not properly executed, required disclosures were missing, the confessing party lacked authority, or the underlying MCA constitutes a usurious loan void under Pennsylvania or New York law.
Strategy 2: Use Pennsylvania's 6% Usury Cap. Let's talk numbers. Pennsylvania's usury cap for non-licensed lenders is just 6% under 41 P.S. §201 — dramatically lower than even New York's 25% criminal usury threshold. If the MCA funder isn't properly licensed under Pennsylvania's Consumer Discount Company Act and the effective APR exceeds 6%, the contract may be void under Pennsylvania law. This is an extraordinarily powerful defense that few other states can match.
You took a second MCA to pay the first. Now the daily payments eat 30% of your revenue — and you can't make payroll. This is common among Philadelphia businesses — restaurants in Center City and Northern Liberties, construction firms in the Northeast, and healthcare practices across the metro. Under UCC § 9-607, each funder has filed UCC-1 liens with the Pennsylvania Department of State.
Strategy 1: Consolidate via Ch. 11. Chapter 11 filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania can pause all MCA collections and reclassify MCAs as unsecured debt. Philadelphia's bankruptcy court has significant experience with commercial debt restructuring.
Strategy 2: Use Your Cash Flow Reality as a Weapon. Here's what nobody tells you: funders assume you're lying about your finances. Every single time. Provide them with bank statements showing unsustainable daily debits. Philadelphia's business wage tax (3.75% for residents) adds to operating costs, strengthening the argument that MCA debits make continued operations impossible. Funders would rather settle for 40 cents on the dollar than risk getting nothing.
Let's talk numbers. MCA contracts often mask APRs exceeding 100% — sometimes 200% or more. Philadelphia business owners have an exceptionally powerful usury defense: Pennsylvania's cap is just 6% for non-licensed lenders. Even under New York law (which likely governs the contract), the 25% criminal usury cap makes most MCAs void. The Yellowstone Capital judgment proved these defenses work at scale.
Strategy 1: Pennsylvania's 6% Usury Defense. Do the math. If the MCA funder lacks proper Pennsylvania licensing and the effective APR exceeds 6%, the contract may be void under state law. This is among the strongest usury defenses available anywhere in the country.
Strategy 2: New York Usury as a Defense. Under the contract's New York choice-of-law provision, any effective APR above 25% constitutes criminal usury. A $50K advance at a 1.4 factor rate costs $70K over 6 months — approximately 150% APR, far exceeding both thresholds.
Here's why this matters: most MCA funders sit in New York. Your contract almost certainly designates New York law as the governing jurisdiction. New York's dual usury framework (16% civil, 25% criminal) gives you powerful defense tools. But as a Pennsylvania business owner, you can also argue for application of Pennsylvania law with its dramatically lower 6% usury cap.
The choice-of-law question itself becomes a weapon: if New York law applies, the 25% criminal usury cap voids most MCAs; if Pennsylvania law applies, the 6% cap makes the defense even stronger. Either way, the funder loses. The best MCA defense attorneys play both sides of this jurisdictional divide.
The CFPB has classified merchant cash advances as "credit" under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act — another signal that these products are functionally loans regardless of how the contract labels them. That gives MCA defense attorneys one more argument in their arsenal.
1. Do they actually do MCA defense — in Pennsylvania courts? This is critical for Philly businesses. Ask about experience filing petitions to open or strike judgments in Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas under Pa.R.C.P. 2950–2959.
2. Are real attorneys involved who know both PA and NY usury law? The strongest defenses use Pennsylvania's 6% cap and New York's 25% criminal threshold simultaneously.
3. What's the fee structure? Legitimate firms charge 18–25% of enrolled debt, collected only after results. Any firm charging upfront fees — that's prohibited by FTC guidelines.
Your search is over. Of these three firms, only Delancey Street does real, attorney-coordinated MCA defense — COJ challenges in both PA and NY courts, usury defenses, UCC lien disputes. Here's how they stack up for Philly business owners in 2026.

The only firm on this list that does real MCA defense: COJ challenges in both PA and NY courts, usury defenses using Pennsylvania's 6% cap and New York's 25% threshold, UCC lien disputes, and emergency motions. Over $100M settled. No upfront fees. This is what they do.

Not an MCA defense specialist — and they'll tell you that straight up. Handles general unsecured business debt. Solid option for traditional unsecured debt if that's your situation.

Not an MCA defense specialist either. CuraDebt handles business debt and IRS/state tax resolution — they've been doing it for over 25 years. If your Philly business also has PA DOR or IRS obligations, they can handle that side while a firm like Delancey Street handles the MCA fight.

We get it. COJ filed in PA or NY court. Bank account frozen. Daily ACH debits bleeding your business dry. This is what we do. Delancey Street's attorney network challenges COJs in both jurisdictions, raises usury defenses under PA's 6% cap and NY's 25% threshold, and negotiates settlements. Over $100M settled. No upfront fees. Call now.
Call for a Free ConsultationThis page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. Individual results vary.
Rankings reflect independent editorial judgment. This website does not receive compensation from listed companies.
No attorney-client relationship is formed by visiting this website. Debt settlement may have tax consequences.
Delancey Street is not a law firm. Attorney services are provided by independent, licensed attorneys within the Delancey Street network.
Attorney Advertising.