Contents
If you're a San Jose business owner dealing with an MCA mess — confessions of judgment, UCC-1 liens filed with the California Secretary of State, personal guarantees, daily ACH debits draining your account — you need a firm that lives and breathes this world. Not a general business attorney. Not a consumer debt shop. A firm that knows both New York MCA law and California's own borrower protections. Here are the three best options serving San Jose and Silicon Valley business owners in 2026.
Here's what you need to know: Delancey Street is not a law firm. They coordinate with a nationwide network of licensed attorneys who do the actual fighting — COJ challenges, usury defenses, UCC lien disputes, funder negotiations, settlement execution. Their network is built around New York's dual usury framework — which governs the vast majority of MCA contracts regardless of where your business operates — and the evolving appellate case law that's reclassifying MCAs as loans subject to interest rate caps. For San Jose businesses, they also use California SB 1235 disclosure requirements and state usury protections. This is what they do.
What sets Delancey Street apart from every other firm on this list is simple: MCA-specific legal firepower. Their attorneys don't just negotiate — they challenge. They file motions to vacate confessions of judgment, raise criminal usury defenses when effective APRs exceed 25%, dispute overbroad UCC-1 filings with the California Secretary of State, and use the NY Attorney General's $1 billion Yellowstone Capital settlement as precedent in funder negotiations. Over $100M in commercial debt settled. No upfront fees. Results-based pricing.
Not an MCA defense specialist — and they'll tell you that straight up. National Debt Relief is the largest debt settlement company in the United States — over $1 billion in debt settled, 550,000+ clients served. They handle general unsecured business debts — credit cards, vendor accounts, lines of credit — but they do not challenge confessions of judgment, file usury defenses, or dispute UCC liens. If your debt is primarily traditional unsecured business debt and not MCA-specific, they're a strong, proven option. If you're dealing with MCA funders, COJs, or frozen accounts, you need a firm with MCA-specific attorney involvement.
Not an MCA defense specialist either. CuraDebt handles business debt and IRS/state tax resolution — they've been doing it for over 25 years. If your situation involves both MCA debt and California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) or IRS obligations, CuraDebt can handle the tax side while a firm like Delancey Street handles the MCA fight. They do not challenge COJs, raise usury defenses, or file legal motions against MCA funders.
Let's cut to it. MCA defense is about one thing — stopping funders from destroying the business you built. The weapons they use are specific: confessions of judgment, UCC Article 9 liens, personal guarantee enforcement, and aggressive daily ACH withdrawals. For San Jose business owners, the problem hits harder because of Silicon Valley's economics — sky-high operating costs (commercial rents averaging $4–6 per square foot, California's $16/hour minimum wage), a competitive labor market, and the pressure to scale quickly that drives many businesses to take on MCA funding they can't sustain.
San Jose's economy extends far beyond the tech giants. IT staffing and consulting firms, SaaS startups between Series A and B funding, restaurants and hospitality operators in downtown San Jose and Santana Row, construction contractors building out the Valley's infrastructure, medical and dental practices, and the professional services firms that support them all. These businesses share a common vulnerability: strong monthly revenue but capital-intensive operations with thin margins. When a funder pulls 15–25% of daily revenue through ACH debits, a San Jose business can go from profitable to insolvent in weeks.
The MCA agreement you signed is written entirely in the funder's favor and almost certainly designates New York as the governing jurisdiction. That's why you need an attorney who knows both New York MCA law (usury challenges, COJ procedures) and California's own borrower protections (SB 1235 disclosure requirements, the state constitution's usury cap, and California Code of Civil Procedure provisions governing COJ enforcement).
Here's what happens — and it happens fast. The moment your San Jose business misses a merchant cash advance payment, the funder starts collection. MCA default is governed by Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Article 9 provisions, and many funders use confessions of judgment (COJs) to obtain judgments without notice. Good news first: the 2019 CPLR §3218 amendment banned COJ enforcement against out-of-state defendants in New York courts. Since your business is in California, any COJ filed against you in New York after August 2019 is likely voidable. Period.
But funders have adapted. They now pursue restraining notices through domesticated judgments, file UCC-1 liens with the California Secretary of State, and use aggressive ACH withdrawal strategies to collect before you can respond. The consequences for San Jose businesses are particularly severe: frozen accounts can halt payroll for tech employees (who are notoriously mobile and will leave for competitors immediately), UCC liens can trigger default clauses in existing venture capital or investor agreements, and revenue diversion can cause cascading failures across subscription billing systems. For venture-backed companies, an MCA default can poison future fundraising rounds.
You signed an MCA agreement with a New York-based funder that contains a COJ. Here's the good news: New York Senate Bill S6395, signed in August 2019, banned the filing of confessions of judgment against out-of-state defendants in New York courts. Any COJ filed against your San Jose business in New York after that date is voidable. That's your opening.
Strategy 1: Challenge the COJ as Voidable. If a funder filed a COJ against you in New York after August 2019, your attorney can file an Order to Show Cause to vacate the judgment as a matter of law. And California Code of Civil Procedure §1132–1134 imposes its own requirements for COJ enforcement within the state — a secondary line of defense if the funder tries to domesticate a New York judgment in California courts.
Strategy 2: Negotiate Post-Default. Funders prefer repayment over cross-jurisdictional litigation. The cost of pursuing a San Jose business owner through both New York and California courts is significant, and funders know that enforcing judgments across state lines — particularly from New York to California's Northern District — adds months of delay and legal expense. Offer a lump-sum settlement (30–50% of the balance) — funders often accept because the alternative is a costly multi-state collection effort.
You took a second MCA to pay the first. Now the daily payments eat 30% of your revenue — and you can't make payroll. This is increasingly common among San Jose businesses — tech services companies in North San Jose, SaaS startups burning through runway in Santa Clara, restaurants competing for foot traffic downtown, construction firms managing multiple build-outs across the Valley. Under UCC § 9-607, each funder has filed UCC-1 liens on your receivables with the California Secretary of State, creating a lien stack that makes it impossible to obtain any new financing — or, critically for tech companies, to close an investor round.
Strategy 1: Consolidate via Ch. 11 or California Law. Chapter 11 filed in the Northern District of California (San Jose Division) can pause all MCA collections and reclassify MCAs as unsecured debt. California's SB 1235 requires commercial financing providers to disclose APR equivalents, total cost of financing, and payment amounts — if your funder failed to make these disclosures, it strengthens your defense and may provide grounds to void the contract.
Strategy 2: Use Your Cash Flow Reality as a Weapon. Provide funders with 6 months of bank statements showing unsustainable withdrawals. Here's what nobody tells you: funders assume you're lying about your finances. Every single time. For San Jose businesses facing some of the highest commercial rents and labor costs in the country — the bank statements prove it. Funders would rather settle for 40 cents on the dollar than risk getting nothing if the business closes.
The best MCA defense firms have relationships with the New York-based funders who dominate the San Jose market. They know which funders will settle quickly and which will fight — and they adjust strategy accordingly.
Let's talk numbers. MCA contracts often mask APRs exceeding 100% — sometimes 200% or more. While your contract likely designates New York law, California provides additional protections. The California Constitution (Article XV) caps interest at 10% for non-exempt lenders, and California's Finance Lenders Law requires licensing for entities making commercial loans. MCA funders that aren't properly licensed in California may be subject to these caps. The NY Attorney General's $1.065 billion judgment against Yellowstone Capital proved that MCA contracts can be voided at scale when the underlying economics constitute usury.
Strategy 1: Usury as a Defense. Do the math. A $50K advance at a 1.4 factor rate costs $70K over 6 months — approximately 150% APR. Under New York's criminal usury cap of 25%, the contract is void. Under California's 10% cap for non-exempt lenders, it may be doubly void. Discovery is key: subpoena the funder's underwriting docs and California Attorney General licensing records. If they used credit scores or fixed repayment terms and lack proper California licensing, courts may deem it a usurious loan.
Strategy 2: SB 1235 Disclosure Violations. California SB 1235, effective December 2022, requires commercial financing providers to disclose the total dollar cost, APR, payment amounts, and other terms in a standardized format. If your MCA funder failed to provide these disclosures, an attorney can use this violation in settlement negotiations or as the basis for a state regulatory complaint with the California DFPI (Department of Financial Protection and Innovation). For San Jose tech companies, SB 1235 violations are particularly common because many MCA funders operating in Silicon Valley are not properly registered with the DFPI.
Here's why this matters: most MCA funders sit in New York. Nearly all MCA contracts designate New York courts as the governing jurisdiction. That means a San Jose business owner in North San Jose, Willow Glen, or Campbell is fighting under the same New York legal rules as a business owner in Manhattan.
This actually works in your favor. New York operates a dual usury framework: civil interest is capped at 16% annually, while any effective rate above 25% constitutes criminal usury. The consequences of crossing the criminal threshold are severe — the contract is declared void as a matter of law, and the funder forfeits the right to recover both principal and interest. As an out-of-state borrower, you also benefit from the 2019 CPLR §3218 reform banning COJ enforcement against California businesses in New York courts.
Here's the thing — California's own regulatory framework provides a second layer of defense. The CFPB has classified merchant cash advances as "credit" under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act — another signal that these products are functionally loans regardless of how the contract labels them. That gives MCA defense attorneys one more argument in their arsenal. And California's Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) has been increasingly active in regulating commercial financing providers operating in the Bay Area. The best MCA defense attorneys use both New York and California law to build the strongest possible case for San Jose business owners.
Three questions matter:
1. Do they actually do MCA defense? Not consumer debt. Not medical debt. MCA debt. Ask how many COJs they've challenged, how many usury defenses they've raised under New York law, whether they understand California SB 1235 disclosure requirements, and what their average settlement percentage is on MCA-specific obligations. If they can't answer with specifics, keep looking. For tech companies, also ask whether they understand how UCC liens interact with venture capital agreements and investor rights.
2. Are real attorneys involved? Settlement negotiation alone is not MCA defense. You need attorneys licensed by the State Bar of California who file motions to vacate COJs, challenge UCC liens filed with the California Secretary of State, subpoena funder underwriting documents for usury discovery, and draft enforceable settlement agreements. Ask whether attorneys are directly involved in every case or only brought in for escalations.
3. What's the fee structure? Legitimate MCA defense firms charge 18–25% of the enrolled debt amount, collected only after delivering results. Any firm that charges upfront fees before settling your debt — that's prohibited by FTC guidelines. Walk away. For a single MCA, top firms resolve cases in 2–8 weeks. For stacked MCAs with multiple funders, expect 3–6 months.
Your search is over. Of these three firms, only Delancey Street does real, attorney-coordinated MCA defense — COJ challenges, usury defenses, UCC lien disputes. The other two handle broader categories of business debt and may fit depending on your situation.
The only firm on this list that does real MCA defense: COJ challenges, usury defenses under both New York and California law, UCC lien disputes, and emergency motions to unfreeze bank accounts — all coordinated through a nationwide network of licensed attorneys. Not a law firm — but their attorney-coordinated model delivers the legal firepower of one combined with the settlement expertise of a dedicated debt resolution company. Over $100M settled. No upfront fees. This is what they do.
Not an MCA defense specialist — and they'll tell you that straight up. National Debt Relief handles general unsecured business debt — credit cards, vendor accounts, lines of credit. No COJ challenges, no usury defenses, no legal motions. If your debt is primarily traditional unsecured debt (not MCAs), they're a proven option with massive scale.
Not an MCA defense specialist either. CuraDebt handles business debt and IRS/state tax resolution — they've been doing it for over 25 years. No COJ challenges, no usury defenses. If your San Jose business also has California FTB or IRS tax obligations, they can handle that side while a firm like Delancey Street handles the MCA fight.
We get it. COJ filed against you. Bank account frozen. Daily ACH debits destroying your cash flow. Delancey Street's attorney network fights MCA funders with usury defenses under New York and California law, COJ challenges, and settlement negotiation. Over $100M settled. Free consultation. This is what we do.
Call for a Free ConsultationThis page is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. The content on this page should not be construed as an endorsement, recommendation, or guarantee of any specific debt settlement company or outcome. Individual results may vary based on the nature of the debt, creditor policies, and the specific circumstances of each case.
The rankings and evaluations presented reflect the independent editorial judgment of our review team based on publicly available information. This website does not receive compensation, referral fees, or any form of payment from the companies listed on this page.
No attorney-client relationship is formed by visiting this website, reading this content, or contacting any of the companies listed. Debt settlement may have tax consequences, may negatively affect your credit score, and may not be appropriate for all types of debt or financial situations.
Delancey Street is not a law firm. Delancey Street works with a nationwide network of attorneys and debt specialists who handle MCA defense, business debt settlement, and related services. Any attorney services referenced on this page are provided by independent, licensed attorneys within the Delancey Street network — not by Delancey Street directly.
Attorney Advertising. This page may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.