Contents
Pennsylvania business owners in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Allentown, Erie, Reading, and across the Commonwealth need firms that understand cognovit note defense, Pa.R.C.P. No. 2959 petitions to open judgment, and both Pennsylvania and New York usury frameworks. Here are the three best options in 2026.
Let's be clear — Delancey Street is not a law firm. They coordinate with a network of licensed attorneys who use Pennsylvania’s cognovit note procedures, the 6% usury cap, the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, and New York’s dual usury framework for Pennsylvania businesses in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Allentown, and statewide.
Their attorneys file petitions to open cognovit judgments under Pa.R.C.P. No. 2959, raise usury defenses, dispute UCC-1 filings with the Pennsylvania Department of State, and use the $1 billion Yellowstone settlement. Over $100M settled. No upfront fees.
Here's the thing — National Debt Relief is not an MCA defense specialist. They handle general unsecured business debt. If your Pennsylvania business debt is traditional unsecured debt, they're a solid option — but if you're dealing with an MCA, this is not your firm.
Not MCA-specific. They handle business debt and tax resolution — including Pennsylvania Department of Revenue issues.
Here’s the brutal truth about Pennsylvania. It’s one of only a handful of states that still permits cognovit notes under Pa.R.C.P. No. 2950. What does that mean for you? A lender can get a judgment against your business without filing a lawsuit, without serving you, and without giving you a chance to defend yourself. MCA funders know this — and they embed cognovit clauses in every contract they hand to a Pennsylvania business owner.
This makes Pennsylvania a dual COJ risk state. An MCA funder can pursue a cognovit judgment in Pennsylvania state court and a confession of judgment in New York simultaneously. While New York’s 2019 CPLR §3218 reform banned COJ enforcement against out-of-state borrowers, Pennsylvania businesses face the additional threat of in-state cognovit proceedings. Philadelphia’s and Pittsburgh’s large small-business populations — from restaurants and retail to healthcare practices and professional services — are frequent targets.
Pennsylvania’s economy, driven by healthcare, manufacturing, technology (particularly in Pittsburgh’s robotics corridor), agriculture, energy, and financial services, generates substantial MCA demand. The Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (73 Pa. Stat. § 201-1 et seq.) provides protections against deceptive business practices, with private right of action and treble damages available.
You could wake up tomorrow with a judgment already entered against you — no notice, no hearing, nothing. That’s the cognovit note reality in Pennsylvania. The funder levies on your bank accounts and business assets the same day. UCC liens filed with the Pennsylvania Department of State block new financing. Daily ACH debits keep draining your account. Pennsylvania’s 6% usury cap applies to loans under $50,000 (41 Pa. Stat. § 201), but there is no statutory cap for larger commercial transactions. You need someone in your corner — now.
Unlike most states, Pennsylvania permits cognovit notes under Pa.R.C.P. No. 2950. But the law provides a remedy: under Pa.R.C.P. No. 2959, a defendant can petition to open a cognovit judgment by showing a meritorious defense — usury, fraud, unconscionability, or that the MCA is actually a loan. Courts in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and across Pennsylvania routinely hear these petitions.
Strategy: File a petition to open judgment under Pa.R.C.P. No. 2959 immediately. Raise usury defenses (6% cap for loans under $50K), unconscionability, and MCA-to-loan reclassification arguments. Simultaneously challenge any New York COJ under the 2019 CPLR §3218 reform.
Under UCC § 9-607, lenders file UCC-1 liens with the Pennsylvania Department of State. Philadelphia restaurants, Pittsburgh tech startups, Allentown manufacturing businesses, and Erie service companies are frequently caught in MCA stacking during economic downturns.
Strategy: Chapter 11 in U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia) or Western District (Pittsburgh). Pennsylvania provides no state homestead exemption, but debtors may elect federal exemptions under 11 U.S.C. § 522(d), including a $27,900 homestead exemption. Or use cash flow reality with 6 months of bank statements showing unsustainable ACH withdrawals.
Pennsylvania caps interest at 6% for loans under $50,000 under 41 Pa. Stat. § 201. For larger commercial loans, there is no statutory cap, but unconscionability arguments remain available. MCA contracts with 100–400% APRs are still vulnerable under NY Gen. Oblig. Law § 5-501, where the criminal usury threshold is 25%. The Yellowstone judgment voided $534 million in MCA debt.
Strategy: Dual usury defense for smaller MCAs under Pennsylvania’s 6% cap and NY’s 25% criminal threshold. For larger MCAs, focus on NY criminal usury, unconscionability, and the Pennsylvania UTPCPL (73 Pa. Stat. § 201-1) for deceptive practices claims with treble damages.
Your Pennsylvania MCA contract designates New York law — and that’s actually a weapon in your hands. NY’s 16% civil and 25% criminal usury caps apply. Combined with Pennsylvania’s own 6% cap (for loans under $50K), your attorney has multiple frameworks to void the contract entirely. The CFPB’s classification of MCAs as “credit” further supports reclassification. Pennsylvania’s proximity to New York means many PA businesses deal with the same funders, and Philadelphia and Pittsburgh courts are increasingly familiar with MCA disputes.
1. MCA-specific experience? Ask about cognovit note challenges, Pa.R.C.P. No. 2959 petitions, and usury defenses under both Pennsylvania and New York law.
2. Licensed attorneys involved? You need attorneys filing petitions to open judgment and challenging UCC liens with the Pennsylvania Department of State.
3. Fee structure? 18–25% of enrolled debt after results. No upfront fees. Pennsylvania regulates debt management under the Debt Management Services Act (63 Pa. Stat. § 2401).
Only Delancey Street offers true MCA defense for Pennsylvania businesses with attorney-coordinated cognovit challenges, usury defenses, and UCC lien disputes.
True MCA defense: cognovit note challenges under Pa.R.C.P. No. 2959, dual usury defenses (PA 6% + NY 25%), UCC disputes, emergency motions. Over $100M settled. No upfront fees.
Not MCA-specific. They only handle general unsecured business debt — not merchant cash advances.
Not MCA-specific. Handles debt and tax resolution including Pennsylvania Department of Revenue issues.
Delancey Street’s attorneys challenge cognovit judgments under Pa.R.C.P. No. 2959, raise usury defenses, and negotiate settlements. Over $100M settled.
Call for a Free ConsultationThis page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. Individual results vary.
Rankings reflect independent editorial judgment. No compensation from listed companies.
No attorney-client relationship is formed. Debt settlement may have tax consequences.
Delancey Street is not a law firm. Attorney services provided by independent, licensed attorneys within the Delancey Street network.
Attorney Advertising.