Contents
If you're a Dallas business owner dealing with an MCA mess — confessions of judgment, UCC-1 liens filed with the Texas Secretary of State, personal guarantees, daily ACH debits draining your account — you need a firm that lives and breathes this world. Texas's prohibition on COJs gives you a unique advantage, but funders have developed alternative collection strategies that require experienced MCA defense counsel. Here are the three best options serving Dallas business owners in 2026.
Here's what you need to know: Delancey Street is not a law firm. They coordinate with a nationwide network of licensed attorneys who do the actual fighting — COJ challenges, usury defenses, UCC lien disputes, funder negotiations, settlement execution. Their network is built around New York's dual usury framework — which governs the vast majority of MCA contracts regardless of where your business operates — and the evolving appellate case law that's reclassifying MCAs as loans subject to interest rate caps. For Dallas businesses, they also use Texas's COJ prohibition, the DTPA, and the state's unlimited homestead exemption. This is what they do.
What sets Delancey Street apart from every other firm on this list is simple: MCA-specific legal firepower. Their attorneys don't just negotiate — they challenge. They file motions to vacate confessions of judgment filed in New York courts, raise criminal usury defenses when effective APRs exceed 25%, dispute overbroad UCC-1 filings with the Texas Secretary of State, and use the NY Attorney General's $1 billion Yellowstone Capital settlement as precedent in funder negotiations. Over $100M in commercial debt settled. No upfront fees. Results-based pricing.
Not an MCA defense specialist — and they'll tell you that straight up. National Debt Relief is the largest debt settlement company in the United States — over $1 billion in debt settled, 550,000+ clients served. They handle general unsecured business debts — credit cards, vendor accounts, lines of credit — but they do not challenge confessions of judgment, file usury defenses, or dispute UCC liens. If your debt is primarily traditional unsecured business debt and not MCA-specific, they're a strong, proven option. If you're dealing with MCA funders, COJs, or frozen accounts, you need a firm with MCA-specific attorney involvement.
Not an MCA defense specialist either. CuraDebt handles business debt and IRS/state tax resolution — they've been doing it for over 25 years. If your situation involves both MCA debt and Texas Comptroller or IRS obligations, CuraDebt can handle the tax side while a firm like Delancey Street handles the MCA fight. They do not challenge COJs, raise usury defenses, or file legal motions against MCA funders.
Let's cut to it. MCA defense is about one thing — stopping funders from destroying the business you built. The weapons they use are specific: confessions of judgment, UCC Article 9 liens, personal guarantee enforcement, and aggressive daily ACH withdrawals. For Dallas business owners, the problem is compounded by the city's rapid growth — DFW is one of the fastest-growing metro areas in the country, with thousands of new businesses launching every year. That growth has made Dallas a prime hunting ground for MCA funders.
Dallas's economy is dominated by industries with strong revenue but capital-intensive operations: commercial real estate firms that need bridge financing, healthcare practices expanding to new locations, technology startups scaling rapidly, and restaurants competing in one of America's most dynamic dining scenes. These businesses turn to MCAs for quick capital, only to find themselves trapped by factor rates of 1.3–1.5 and daily ACH debits that consume 15–25% of revenue. When a downtown Dallas restaurant or an Uptown medical practice can't sustain those daily withdrawals, the MCA funder activates its collection arsenal.
The MCA agreement you signed is written entirely in the funder's favor and almost certainly designates New York as the governing jurisdiction. That's why you need an attorney who knows both New York MCA law (usury challenges, COJ procedures) and Texas's own business protections (COJ prohibition, the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Texas Finance Code Chapter 305, and the state's unlimited homestead exemption).
Here's what happens — and it happens fast. The moment your Dallas business misses a merchant cash advance payment, the funder starts collection. MCA default is governed by Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Article 9 provisions, and many funders use confessions of judgment (COJs) to obtain judgments without notice. Good news first: Texas does not recognize confessions of judgment — they are void and unenforceable under Texas law. And the 2019 CPLR §3218 amendment banned COJ enforcement against out-of-state defendants in New York courts. Period.
But funders have adapted. They now pursue domesticated judgments through Texas courts, file UCC-1 liens with the Texas Secretary of State, use aggressive ACH withdrawal strategies, and seek bank restraining notices to freeze your accounts. The consequences are immediate: frozen accounts at major banks, liens that block new financing, and revenue diversion that can shut down operations. But Texas law also gives you unique protections — the unlimited homestead exemption shields your primary residence from judgment creditors, and the DTPA gives you grounds for counterclaims if the MCA funder engaged in deceptive trade practices.
You signed an MCA agreement with a New York-based funder that contains a COJ. Here's the good news: you have a double layer of protection. Texas does not recognize confessions of judgment under Texas law, and New York Senate Bill S6395, signed in August 2019, banned the filing of confessions of judgment against out-of-state defendants in New York courts. Any COJ filed against your Dallas business is voidable on two independent legal grounds. That's your opening.
Strategy 1: Challenge the COJ on Dual Grounds. If a funder filed a COJ against you in New York, your attorney can file an Order to Show Cause to vacate the judgment based on the 2019 CPLR §3218 reform. If the funder tries to domesticate the judgment in Texas courts, it will fail because Texas does not recognize COJs. This dual protection makes Dallas business owners among the best-positioned in the country to fight COJ-based MCA collections.
Strategy 2: Use DTPA Counterclaims. Texas's Deceptive Trade Practices Act gives you grounds for counterclaims against MCA funders who engaged in misleading conduct — misrepresenting the MCA as a "purchase of receivables" when the economic reality is a high-interest loan, or failing to disclose the true cost of financing. DTPA counterclaims shift the dynamic dramatically — turning you from a debtor into a plaintiff with potential treble damages.
Strategy 3: Negotiate Post-Default. Funders prefer repayment over cross-jurisdictional litigation. The cost of pursuing a Dallas business owner through New York courts — knowing that Texas doesn't recognize COJs — is significant. Offer a lump-sum settlement (30–50% of the balance) — funders often accept because the alternative is a costly, uncertain collection effort.
You took a second MCA to pay the first. Now the daily payments eat 30% of your revenue — and you can't make payroll. This is increasingly common among Dallas businesses — restaurants in Deep Ellum and Uptown, real estate firms in the Design District, healthcare practices in the Medical District, logistics operators near DFW Airport and the I-35 corridor. Under UCC § 9-607, each funder has filed UCC-1 liens on your receivables with the Texas Secretary of State, creating a lien stack that makes it impossible to obtain any new financing.
Strategy 1: Consolidate via Ch. 11. Chapter 11 filed in the Northern District of Texas can pause all MCA collections and reclassify MCAs as unsecured debt. Texas's unlimited homestead exemption means your primary residence is protected regardless of value, and the Northern District of Texas is one of the most active bankruptcy districts in the country.
Strategy 2: Use Your Cash Flow Reality as a Weapon. Provide funders with 6 months of bank statements showing unsustainable withdrawals. Here's what nobody tells you: funders assume you're lying about your finances. Every single time. Dallas businesses facing rising commercial rents in premium areas like Uptown, Victory Park, and the Arts District — combined with multiple daily MCA debits — the bank statements prove it. Funders would rather settle for 40 cents on the dollar than risk a total loss.
The best MCA defense firms have relationships with the New York-based funders who dominate the Dallas market. They know which funders will settle quickly and which will fight — and they adjust strategy accordingly.
Let's talk numbers. MCA contracts often mask APRs exceeding 100% — sometimes 200% or more. While your contract likely designates New York law, Texas provides additional protections. Texas Finance Code Chapter 305 governs usury and provides remedies including forfeiture of both principal and interest for usurious lending. The NY Attorney General's $1.065 billion judgment against Yellowstone Capital proved that MCA contracts can be voided at scale when the underlying economics constitute usury.
Strategy 1: Usury as a Defense. Do the math. A $50K advance at a 1.4 factor rate costs $70K over 6 months — approximately 150% APR. Under New York's criminal usury cap of 25%, the contract is void as a matter of law. Discovery is key: subpoena the funder's underwriting docs. If they used credit scores or fixed repayment terms with no genuine reconciliation mechanism, courts may deem it a usurious loan rather than a purchase of receivables.
Strategy 2: DTPA Counterclaims. Texas's Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) prohibits false, misleading, or deceptive acts in trade or commerce. If an MCA funder misrepresented the nature of the transaction — calling it a "purchase of future receivables" when the economic reality was a high-interest loan with fixed daily payments — a DTPA counterclaim can be filed. DTPA claims carry the potential for treble damages, which dramatically shifts the negotiating dynamic in favor of the Dallas business owner.
Here's why this matters: most MCA funders sit in New York. Nearly all MCA contracts designate New York courts as the governing jurisdiction. That means a Dallas business owner in Uptown, Deep Ellum, or Plano is fighting under the same New York legal rules as a business owner in Manhattan.
This actually works in your favor. New York operates a dual usury framework: civil interest is capped at 16% annually, while any effective rate above 25% constitutes criminal usury. The consequences of crossing the criminal threshold are severe — the contract is declared void as a matter of law, and the funder forfeits the right to recover both principal and interest. As a Texas business owner, you also benefit from Texas's categorical prohibition on COJs and the 2019 CPLR §3218 reform banning COJ enforcement against out-of-state defendants.
Here's the thing — Texas's own protections create a second layer of defense. The Texas Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division provides enforcement support. The CFPB has classified merchant cash advances as "credit" under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act — another signal that these products are functionally loans regardless of how the contract labels them. That gives MCA defense attorneys one more argument in their arsenal. And the DTPA provides grounds for counterclaims against predatory funders. The best MCA defense attorneys use both New York usury law and Texas business protections to build the strongest possible case for Dallas business owners.
Three questions matter:
1. Do they actually do MCA defense? Not consumer debt. Not medical debt. MCA debt. Verify credentials through the State Bar of Texas. Ask how many COJs they've challenged, how many usury defenses they've raised under New York law, whether they understand Texas DTPA counterclaim strategies, and what their average settlement percentage is on MCA-specific obligations. If they can't answer with specifics, keep looking.
2. Are real attorneys involved? Settlement negotiation alone is not MCA defense. You need attorneys who file motions to vacate COJs in New York courts, challenge UCC liens filed with the Texas Secretary of State, subpoena funder underwriting documents for usury discovery, and draft enforceable settlement agreements. Ask whether attorneys are directly involved in every case or only brought in for escalations.
3. What's the fee structure? Legitimate MCA defense firms charge 18–25% of the enrolled debt amount, collected only after delivering results. Any firm that charges upfront fees before settling your debt — that's prohibited by FTC guidelines. Walk away. For a single MCA, top firms resolve cases in 2–8 weeks. For stacked MCAs with multiple funders, expect 3–6 months.
Your search is over. Of these three firms, only Delancey Street does real, attorney-coordinated MCA defense — COJ challenges, usury defenses, UCC lien disputes. The other two handle broader categories of business debt and may fit depending on your situation.
The only firm on this list that does real MCA defense: COJ challenges, usury defenses under New York law, UCC lien disputes, DTPA counterclaims, and emergency motions to unfreeze bank accounts — all coordinated through a nationwide network of licensed attorneys. Not a law firm — but their attorney-coordinated model delivers the legal firepower of one combined with the settlement expertise of a dedicated debt resolution company. Over $100M settled. No upfront fees. This is what they do.
Not an MCA defense specialist — and they'll tell you that straight up. National Debt Relief handles general unsecured business debt — credit cards, vendor accounts, lines of credit. No COJ challenges, no usury defenses, no legal motions. If your debt is primarily traditional unsecured debt (not MCAs), they're a proven option with massive scale.
Not an MCA defense specialist either. CuraDebt handles business debt and IRS/state tax resolution — they've been doing it for over 25 years. No COJ challenges, no usury defenses. If your Dallas business also has Texas Comptroller or IRS tax obligations, they can handle that side while a firm like Delancey Street handles the MCA fight.
We get it. COJ filed against you. Bank account frozen. Daily ACH debits destroying your cash flow. Delancey Street's attorney network fights MCA funders with usury defenses under New York law, COJ challenges, DTPA counterclaims, and settlement negotiation. Over $100M settled. Free consultation. This is what we do.
Call for a Free ConsultationThis page is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. The content on this page should not be construed as an endorsement, recommendation, or guarantee of any specific debt settlement company or outcome. Individual results may vary based on the nature of the debt, creditor policies, and the specific circumstances of each case.
The rankings and evaluations presented reflect the independent editorial judgment of our review team based on publicly available information. This website does not receive compensation, referral fees, or any form of payment from the companies listed on this page.
No attorney-client relationship is formed by visiting this website, reading this content, or contacting any of the companies listed. Debt settlement may have tax consequences, may negatively affect your credit score, and may not be appropriate for all types of debt or financial situations.
Delancey Street is not a law firm. Delancey Street works with a nationwide network of attorneys and debt specialists who handle MCA defense, business debt settlement, and related services. Any attorney services referenced on this page are provided by independent, licensed attorneys within the Delancey Street network — not by Delancey Street directly.
Attorney Advertising. This page may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.