Service & Results.

nyc criminal lawyers over 30 years of experienceWe Know How To Win Cases

Spodek Law Group handles tough cases
nationwide, that demand excellence.

Get Free Consultation

Faced 5+ Years in Prison

People Vs Joseph Amico

Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.

Faced 10+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Anna Sorokin

Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.

Faced 3+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Genevieve Sabourin

Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.

Faced Potential Charges

Ghislaine Maxwell Juror

Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.

Why Choose Us

Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.

Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.

We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.

Law in the Media

View All

Meet Todd Spodek


The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.

Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.

In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.

Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group

The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.

We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.

If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.

How Do Federal Sentencing Guidelines Impact Your Potential Prison Term?

By Spodek Law Group | October 19, 2023
(Last Updated On: October 21, 2023)

Last Updated on: 21st October 2023, 09:14 am

How Do Federal Sentencing Guidelines Impact Your Potential Prison Term?

The federal sentencing guidelines have a major impact on the prison term a defendant may receive if convicted of a federal crime. Here is an overview of how the guidelines work and the key factors that influence sentencing under this system:

Key Factors Influencing Guideline Sentences

1. The Charged Offense(s)

The type of crime you are convicted of determines the base offense level under the guidelines. Certain offenses like fraud, theft, and drug crimes have detailed rules on calculating loss amounts, drug weights, etc. that impact your offense level. More serious charges lead to higher levels and longer sentencing ranges.

2. Specific Offense Characteristics

Most crimes have enhancements based on factors like:

  • Loss amount, for fraud and theft
  • Drug weight, for narcotics
  • Possession of a weapon
  • Role in the offense, like being a leader/organizer
  • Obstructing justice

These add levels and increase the guideline range.

3. Relevant Conduct

Sentences are based not just on the convicted offense, but all related “relevant conduct.” This includes uncharged crimes and acquitted conduct if proven at sentencing by a preponderance of evidence. So your guideline range is impacted by a broader scope of activity, not just the counts of conviction.

4. Criminal History

The guidelines place defendants in one of six criminal history categories based on their prior convictions. More extensive or serious criminal records increase the category and sentencing exposure. Certain “career offender” designations also impact the criminal history score.

5. Multiple Counts of Conviction

The guidelines have rules for determining a combined offense level in cases with multiple counts of conviction. Generally, there is incremental punishment for additional, significant criminal conduct. This can further increase the sentencing range.

6. Mandatory Minimums

Some federal statutes require mandatory minimum prison terms that override the guideline range. These apply in cases involving certain drug trafficking, firearm, or other offenses. Mandatory minimums establish the floor for your sentence.

7. Sentencing Enhancements

Several guidelines provisions can substantially enhance sentences based on factors like:

  • Being a career offender
  • Possession of child pornography
  • Terrorism
  • Hate crimes
  • Sophisticated money laundering

These typically add significant offense levels and lead to lengthy guideline ranges.

8. Acceptance of Responsibility

Pleading guilty and accepting responsibility for the offense can reduce the offense level by 2-3 levels and slightly decrease the guideline range. But the reduction is lost if you put the government to its burden of proof at trial.

9. Assistance to Authorities

Providing “substantial assistance” to the government in investigating or prosecuting others can result in a below-guideline sentence through a 18 U.S.C. 3553(e) motion. This rewards defendants who cooperate fully.

10. Mandatory Guidelines vs. Advisory Guidelines

The guidelines were mandatory until the Supreme Court’s 2005 Booker decision made them advisory. Today, judges have more discretion to impose non-guideline sentences based on the factors in 18 U.S.C. 3553(a). The guidelines are still very influential, but Booker increased flexibility.

How Judges Determine Sentences

While the guidelines provide the starting point, judges can impose sentences outside the range. Here are some key aspects of the sentencing process:

  • Judges first calculate the guideline range and consider it along with mandatory minimums. This is the anchor for sentencing.
  • Departures may be granted if unusual aggravating or mitigating factors exist that were not adequately considered by the guidelines. However, departures are rare.
  • Judges then consider the factors in 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) to determine if a non-guideline “variance” sentence is warranted. Common reasons include individualized circumstances, policy disagreements with the guidelines, and assistance to authorities.
  • Appellate courts review sentences for abuse of discretion and may find non-guideline sentences unreasonable if they stray too far from the guidelines without justification.
  • Although the guidelines are advisory, they remain influential. In fiscal year 2020, 51.4% of sentences fell within the guideline range. But judges exercised discretion to go below the range in 40.1% of cases. True variances above the guidelines were rare, occurring in only 2.6% of cases.[1]

Impact of Mandatory Minimum Sentences

Statutory mandatory minimums enacted by Congress can also constrain judges’ sentencing discretion for certain offenses. These effectively supersede the guidelines by setting a floor for the sentence. Some key examples:

  • 5 year minimum for drug trafficking offenses involving 5+ grams of crack cocaine, 28+ grams of cocaine powder, etc. Harsher penalties apply for larger drug quantities.[2]
  • 5 year minimum for firearms offenses such as possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking crime or violent felony.[3]
  • 10 year minimum for certain federal sex offenses.[4]
  • 15 year minimum for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon who has three prior serious drug or violent felony convictions.[5]
  • 20 year minimum for violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity.[6]

Mandatory minimums have faced criticism for transferring too much sentencing power from judges to prosecutors through charging decisions. But reform efforts have gained little traction in Congress.

How Sentencing Factors Impact Outcomes

While the guidelines provide the starting point, the §3553(a) factors often drive sentences above or below the range:

  • The nature and circumstances of the offense and history/characteristics of the defendant allow judges to individualize sentences based on case specifics. Differences in defendants’ roles, motivations, and backgrounds may warrant non-guideline sentences even in similar cases.
  • Judges may disagree with guideline policies they find unsound, like harsh crack cocaine penalties, and vary downward based on policy disagreements.
  • Family ties, vulnerabilities like mental illness, and evidence of rehabilitation are considered under §3553(a) and may support more lenient sentences.
  • Extent of harm, especially non-economic harms like psychological trauma, influences sentencing. Victim impact statements communicate this harm.
  • Defendants who cooperate extensively and provide substantial assistance to the government may receive large downward variances and reduced sentences.

While the guidelines still anchor federal sentencing, the §3553(a) factors give judges flexibility to tailor sentences based on case specifics. For defense attorneys, presenting compelling mitigating factors under §3553(a) is key to obtaining sentences below the guidelines.

Recent data and trends provide insights into federal sentencing outcomes in the guidelines era:

  • In fiscal year 2020, the average sentence length was 41 months. This decreased from a peak of 56.8 months in 2011.
  • Drug trafficking offenders received average sentences of 66 months in 2020, a decrease from a peak of 87.2 months in 2011.
  • Sentences have trended downward in recent years as judges more frequently grant variances under §3553(a).
  • Below-range variances are also increasingly common in illegal reentry and firearms cases based on fast-track programs and concerns over guideline penalties.
  • Child pornography offenses carry some of the harshest guideline ranges, with average sentences around 180 months. Judges rarely vary below these ranges given offense conduct.
  • The rate of within-range sentences has fallen from 72% in 2004 to 51.4% in 2020, showing the diminished influence of the guidelines.[1]
  • Women receive more below-range variances than men (46.5% vs. 39.2% in 2020) based on family ties, vulnerabilities, and lower recidivism risk.[1]

So while the guidelines still provide anchors, judges are increasingly exercising discretion to impose sentences tailored to case specifics under §3553(a). This allows for greater individualization of federal sentences.


Free Consultation


I was searching for a law firm with some power to help me deal with a warrant in New York . After 6 days I decided to go with Spodek Law Group. It helped that This law firm is well respected by not only the top law firms in New York , but the DA , Judge as well. I...

~Fonder Brandon

5 Stars
It was my good fortune to retain Spodek Law Group for representation for my legal needs. From the beginning, communication was prompt and thorough. Todd, Kenneth and Alex were the first people I worked with and they all made me, and my company Qumana skincare feel comfortable and confident that the team was going to work hard for me. Everything...

~A G

5 Stars
After meeting with several law firms, I chose the Spodek Law Group not only for their professionalism and experience, but for the personal attention given to me right from the initial consultation. It is important to recognize how crucial having the right legal team is when faced with potentially life altering events that impact families and the lives of loved...

~George Cherubini

Spodek Law Group

White Glove Service

We Provide Superior Service, Excellent Results, At A Level Superior To Other Criminal Defense Law Firms. Regardless Of Where Your Case Is, Nationwide, We Can Help You.
View More

Request Free Consultation

Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.


85 Broad St 30th Floor, New York, NY 10004


get directions

Los Angeles

611 S Catalina St Suite 222, Los Angeles, CA 90005


get directions


35-37 36th St, 2nd Floor Astoria, NY 11106


get directions


195 Montague St., 14th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201


get directions
Call Now!