Service & Results.

nyc criminal lawyers over 30 years of experienceWe Know How To Win Cases

Spodek Law Group handles tough cases
nationwide, that demand excellence.

Get Free Consultation

Faced 5+ Years in Prison

People Vs Joseph Amico

Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.

Faced 10+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Anna Sorokin

Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.

Faced 3+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Genevieve Sabourin

Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.

Faced Potential Charges

Ghislaine Maxwell Juror

Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.

Why Choose Us

Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.

Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.

We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.

Law in the Media

View All

Meet Todd Spodek


The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.

Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.

In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.

Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group

The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.

We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.

If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.

How Do Federal Defense Lawyers Challenge Wire Fraud Charges?

By Spodek Law Group | October 19, 2023
(Last Updated On: October 20, 2023)

Last Updated on: 20th October 2023, 11:33 am

How Do Federal Defense Lawyers Challenge Wire Fraud Charges?

Wire fraud is a serious federal crime that carries substantial penalties, including hefty fines and lengthy prison sentences. Defendants facing wire fraud charges need an experienced federal criminal defense lawyer to build the strongest possible defense.

This article will examine common strategies federal defense attorneys use to fight wire fraud allegations in court. It will also look at the typical evidence in these cases and how lawyers work to undermine the prosecution’s arguments. With smart legal representation, many defendants can avoid conviction or at least reduce the consequences.

An Overview of Federal Wire Fraud Laws

The main federal wire fraud statute is 18 U.S.C. § 1343. This law makes it a crime to devise a scheme to defraud someone out of money or property using telephone calls, emails, texts or other electronic communications that cross state or national borders.

The statute applies to any interstate or international wire transmission made “for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice.” This includes both successful schemes and failed attempts.

To prove wire fraud, prosecutors must establish:

  • The defendant knowingly participated in a scheme to defraud
  • The scheme involved a material deception
  • The defendant had intent to defraud
  • Interstate wires were used to further the scheme

Penalties increase when the fraud affects a financial institution or relates to major disasters. Wire fraud involving a bank or disaster relief can lead to 30 years imprisonment. Most other wire fraud convictions carry a 20 year maximum sentence.

How Lawyers Attack the Government’s Evidence

Skilled federal defense attorneys carefully examine the prosecution’s evidence and look for weaknesses to exploit at trial. Some evidence types commonly used in wire fraud cases include:

  • Recorded calls and messages: The government may have recordings of the defendant’s phone calls, emails, texts or other communications. Lawyers review these for exculpatory statements or other flaws.
  • Financial and business records: Prosecutors often use financial statements, bank records, invoices and other documents to try to prove fraud. Defense lawyers scrutinize them for inaccuracies or misinterpretations.
  • Cooperating witness testimony: Accomplices who cooperate with the government often testify against defendants in exchange for leniency. Their credibility can be challenged.
  • Expert witness testimony: The prosecution may call expert witnesses to analyze records and data. Their qualifications and conclusions can be contested.
  • Law enforcement testimony: Investigating agents frequently testify about their investigative activities. However, courts limit the scope of permissible law enforcement testimony.

In wire fraud cases, the electronic evidence trail creates additional avenues for defense lawyers to undermine the prosecution’s version of events. By highlighting contradictory digital information, attorneys can often show reasonable doubt.

Common Wire Fraud Defenses Raised by Experienced Lawyers

There are several legal defenses federal criminal defense attorneys commonly assert when fighting wire fraud charges in court. The most effective defenses depend on the unique facts of each case. Common wire fraud defenses include:

Lack of Intent to Defraud

Since wire fraud requires an intent to defraud, lawyers may argue the defendant acted in good faith without any intent to deceive. Evidence showing the defendant sincerely believed the venture was legitimate can defeat the intent element.

No Misrepresentations Made

Attorneys can argue the evidence fails to show any actual misrepresentations to victims. If the defendant did not make false statements or material omissions, there may be no fraud.

No Reliance on Misrepresentations

In some cases, lawyers contend victims did not actually rely on the defendant’s alleged misrepresentations when deciding to part with money or property. This lack of reliance can undermine the causation element.

Statute of Limitations Expired

The statute of limitations for federal wire fraud charges is five years in most cases. If the alleged fraud occurred beyond this timeframe, the charges could get dismissed.

No Interstate Nexus

Since wire fraud requires interstate wire transmissions, lawyers may claim the government lacks evidence of any communications crossing state or national borders. Intrastate communications do not qualify.

No Criminal Intent

Where the evidence shows the defendant acted negligently or recklessly but did not specifically intend to break the law, attorneys can argue for acquittal based on lack of criminal intent.

Constitutional Violations

Defense lawyers scrutinize the government’s investigative techniques for constitutional problems like illegal searches, lack of Miranda warnings, compelled self-incrimination, etc. Suppressing illegally obtained evidence may sink the prosecution’s case.

Free Consultation


I was searching for a law firm with some power to help me deal with a warrant in New York . After 6 days I decided to go with Spodek Law Group. It helped that This law firm is well respected by not only the top law firms in New York , but the DA , Judge as well. I...

~Fonder Brandon

5 Stars
It was my good fortune to retain Spodek Law Group for representation for my legal needs. From the beginning, communication was prompt and thorough. Todd, Kenneth and Alex were the first people I worked with and they all made me feel comfortable and confident that the team was going to work hard for me. Everything was explained and any concerns...

~A G

5 Stars
After meeting with several law firms, I chose the Spodek Law Group not only for their professionalism and experience, but for the personal attention given to me right from the initial consultation. It is important to recognize how crucial having the right legal team is when faced with potentially life altering events that impact families and the lives of loved...

~George Cherubini

Spodek Law Group

White Glove Service

We Provide Superior Service, Excellent Results, At A Level Superior To Other Criminal Defense Law Firms. Regardless Of Where Your Case Is, Nationwide, We Can Help You.
View More

Request Free Consultation

Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.


85 Broad St 30th Floor, New York, NY 10004


get directions

Los Angeles

611 S Catalina St Suite 222, Los Angeles, CA 90005


get directions


35-37 36th St, 2nd Floor Astoria, NY 11106


get directions


195 Montague St., 14th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201


get directions
Call Now!