Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Federal conspiracy cases can be difficult to defend. To achieve the desired outcome, federal criminal lawyers need a thorough understanding of the evidence held by prosecutors. Conspiracy charges are typically brought about under 18 U.S.C. § 371, and they include a long list of potentially criminal offenses.
A federal conspiracy crime occurs when two or more people agree to commit a crime together, and at least one of them acts overtly to advance the conspiracy. In the federal criminal justice system, conspiracies are broad and confusing charges.
The prosecution doesn’t need a written agreement between the conspirators. It only needs to show that the conspirators were working together to commit a federal crime.
Under 8 U.S.C. § 371, it’s a crime to conspire with others to defraud the U.S. government and to break other federal laws. Essentially, conspiracy is a crime of agreement. Whether the goal of the conspiracy is achieved or not is another matter.
Criminal conspiracy statutes condemn joining with others to carry out illegal activities. These acts are considered so unlawful that merely talking with other people about committing them is considered a crime.
What makes the crime of conspiracy so perplexing is that it’s more focused on agreement and intention than on action.
It’s possible for someone to be charged with and prosecuted for criminal conspiracy even if no crime is committed. The act of planning the crime in and of itself is against the law. A conversation can be used against you to prove that a conspiracy has occurred, even if additional evidence is required.
According to federal conspiracy statute 18 U.S.C. § 371, a conspiracy occurs when two or more individuals agree to commit a federal crime, and at least one of the individuals commits an overt act to further the goal of the conspiracy. Federal law prohibits conspiracies to defraud the United States, impede or injure an officer or engage in violent crimes.
Under the overt act requirement and according to many conspiracy statutes, at least one of the conspirators must commit an action that advances the goal of the conspiracy. Under statutes that require an overt action, agreement alone is not sufficient.
Overt acts might include stockpiling rifles or scoping out a potential crime scene. If one conspirator commits an overt act, all other conspirators become guilty of the crime as well.
Penalties associated with conspiratorial crimes may greatly exceed the maximum five years of imprisonment. Conspiracy can be charged at both the state and federal levels as both a misdemeanor and a felony.
If a conviction occurs, the charges will determine the penalty. You could be charged with committing other crimes besides conspiracy. In that case, separate penalties are imposed for each crime. When state laws are broken in addition to federal laws, stiffer penalties are likely to apply.
Federal conspiracy is an easy crime to to commit, and people can commit conspiracy without even realizing it. Even worse, if one conspirator commits an overt action, then all the conspirators are equally guilty.
This is true even if they were not serious about committing a crime in the first place. Additionally, co-conspirators are responsible for future crimes committed by any conspirator that advance the agenda of the conspiracy.
Conspiracy laws are meant to discourage the formation of criminal cabals by making cabal members easy targets for prosecutors. They are specifically designed to discourage criminal enterprises.
If you have been charged with conspiracy, you still have important constitutional rights. You are entitled to legal representation, a fair and speedy trial, due process and protection against self-incrimination and unreasonable search and seizure.
An experienced federal criminal defense lawyer can assert your constitutional rights to suppress evidence or get the charges dismissed if federal prosecutors violate your rights.
Conspiracy is a crime of intention and agreement. If your lawyer creates reasonable doubt about your complicity, the prosecution must then prove that you clearly intended and agreed to commit a criminal act.
Mere association with a group of conspirators does not prove that you’re guilty of conspiracy, and it’s not legally a conspiracy if you listen to someone else discussing a potential crime.
Similarly, discussing the commission of a crime is not the same thing as agreeing to commit a crime. Rather, there must be clear agreement on your part to perform a criminal offense. Furthermore, the prosecutors must prove the commission of an overt action designed to further the goal of the conspiracy.
Ensuring that prosecutors prove each of these elements beyond a reasonable doubt is what an experienced federal criminal conspiracy lawyer can do to ensure the most positive outcome of your case.
The Federal Conspiracy Law, outlined in 18 U.S.C. 371, states that when two or more individuals join forces to commit a crime under the U.S. Code, they are committing a conspiracy against the United States. This can include conspiring to defraud the government or impede the free exercise of rights. However, the crime of conspiracy is not complete unless one of the conspirators takes an overt act to further the plan.
To conspire with someone means to enter into an unlawful agreement with one or more individuals. Even if the crime is never carried out, the act of conspiring is still a criminal offense. For example, discussing a plan to rob a federally insured bank is not a crime of conspiracy, but taking steps towards completing the goal, such as casing the bank, forms the basis of the crime.
The U.S. Code also includes other federal conspiracy charges, including conspiring against impeding or injuring an officer, aiding prisoners of war, drug trafficking, and more. It’s important to note that while the general conspiracy charge in 18 USC 371 requires an overt act, many of the others do not.
The penalties for a federal conspiracy conviction depend on the crime that is the object of the conspiracy. The maximum sentence for conspiring to commit a crime against the United States is five years in prison and a fine. However, the potential consequences can vary depending on the specific conspiracy charge, with some carrying the same penalty as the completed crime, such as conspiracy to commit drug trafficking.
Are you facing the dire reality of a federal criminal conspiracy charge? Make no mistake, such a charge is a grave matter that carries the weight of up to five years behind bars. It’s important to remember that conspiracy charges are often paired with other charges, resulting in a potential lifetime of incarceration if found guilty. It’s vital to grasp the full extent of your situation.
But what exactly constitutes a federal criminal conspiracy charge? At its core, it’s an agreement between two or more individuals to commit an unlawful act, coupled with the willing participation in said act. Keep in mind, the accused doesn’t need to be aware of the entire plan or involved in every aspect of it, only aware of the unlawful act and actively participating in some capacity. To break it down further, there are three specific elements: an agreement (expressed or implied), intent to commit the crime, and an overt act.
These charges can stem from a variety of white-collar criminal acts, such as healthcare fraud, bank fraud, tax fraud, computer crimes, securities fraud, Medicare fraud, money laundering and mail or wire fraud. But it’s not limited to just these, as it can also include conspiracy to violate the Controlled Substances Act or conspiracy to commit armed robbery.
Defending against federal criminal conspiracy charges can be a daunting task, as co-conspirator statements can be used as evidence against the defendant, all co-conspirators can be tried in the same trial, and the prosecutor doesn’t need to prove the defendant agreed to further the crime, only that it was foreseeable. But there are effective defense strategies that have been utilized in the past, such as renunciation, withdrawal, and impossibility.
Don’t navigate this trying time alone. Request a consultation today and arm yourself with the knowledge and representation necessary to mount a robust defense against these severe charges.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.