Spodek Law Group handles tough cases
nationwide, that demand excellence.
Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 6th April 2023, 10:03 pm
Wiretapping, a term often associated with law enforcement officials cracking down on crime, is a far more pervasive issue than most people realize. In California, Penal Code 631 PC outlines the crime of wiretapping, making it unlawful for anyone to use a recording device to tap directly into someone else’s phone line for the purpose of listening in on their private conversations. In this article, we aim to shed light on California wiretapping legislation by answering the following questions: When is wiretapping illegal in California? How is Penal Code 631 PC applied to law enforcement investigations? Is the government allowed to wiretap prisoners’ telephone calls?
The state of California operates under a “two-party consent” law, which means that anyone wishing to record a conversation must first obtain consent from all parties involved. Any unauthorized recording or monitoring of phone conversations without consent can result in a wiretapping charge.
California’s wiretapping laws specifically prohibit:
Tapping into or creating an unauthorized connection to any telegraph or telephone line using any machine or instrument with the intent to do so
Reading, attempting to read, or learning the contents of any message passing over a telephone or wire without the permission of all parties involved
Using or attempting to use any information retrieved in this manner
Aiding or conspiring with another to commit any of the aforementioned acts
While law enforcement officials have the authority to wiretap phone lines for the purpose of solving crimes, they must first obtain a warrant. The warrant must specify the scope of the wiretap and the types of conversations that can be monitored. Violating the terms of a warrant can result in suppression of the evidence obtained from the wiretap and possible disciplinary action against the officials involved.
Prisoners do not have an expectation of privacy in their phone conversations and can be monitored and recorded by prison officials. However, the monitoring must be for legitimate penological reasons and must not be done solely for the purpose of gathering information.
In conclusion, California’s wiretapping laws are designed to protect the privacy of its citizens. If you are facing wiretapping charges or have questions about wiretapping laws in California, it is crucial to consult a skilled criminal defense attorney. The attorneys at Spodek Law Group are experienced in handling wiretapping cases and are available to provide legal advice and representation. Contact us today for a confidential consultation.
Wiretapping is a serious offense in California, and it can be a confusing area of the law. It’s crucial to understand what wiretapping is, what the potential penalties are, and the related offenses. In this article, we will provide a comprehensive guide to help you understand wiretapping in California.
Wiretapping laws in California apply to more than just landlines. It’s also illegal to intercept calls on cellular phones and cordless phones. This means that if you tap into someone’s phone line or monitor their calls without their consent, you could face serious consequences.
The crime of wiretapping in California is a wobbler offense. This means that the District Attorney can choose to try it as either a misdemeanor or a felony, based on the circumstances of the case and the defendant’s criminal history. If convicted as a misdemeanor, you could face a fine of up to $2,500, up to a year in county jail, or both. As a felony, the jail sentence is sixteen months, two years, or three years.
If this is a second conviction on wiretapping charges or of certain other crimes associated with invasion of privacy, the maximum fine goes up to $10,000. These penalties are severe, and it’s important to avoid wiretapping altogether.
It’s essential to know that any evidence gained through illegal wiretapping is prohibited from use in any court proceeding. If you obtained information through an illegal wiretap with the objective of using it against someone else in a court case, you’ll be disappointed. The exception to this rule is criminal trials for a violation of Penal Code 631 by the wiretapper. This means that you could face legal repercussions for your actions, even if you don’t use the information in court.
If you have been accused of criminal wiretapping, you might very well be looking at a lawsuit by the person or people who are the supposed victims of the wiretapping. According to California criminal law, victims can bring a civil suit for damages against someone who committed criminal wiretapping against them. This could result in significant financial and legal trouble.
Eavesdropping and wiretapping are similar but not identical. Wiretapping is the act of intercepting and listening in on conversations by tapping into the phone line, whereas eavesdropping is the act of listening in on conversations using an electronic device but without tapping a phone line. This statute also applies to hidden video cameras and secret video recordings. In cases where a conversation took place in a public area where the speaker did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy, it might not be considered improper eavesdropping. Eavesdropping is also a wobbler. If convicted as a misdemeanor, you could face up to a year in county jail, a fine, or both. As a felony, the conviction carries a jail sentence of sixteen months, two years, or three years in state prison, a fine, or both.
Wiretapping is a powerful tool that law enforcement officers can use to gather evidence in their investigations. But with great power comes great responsibility. In California, the law governing wiretapping is Penal Code 631 PC, which sets out strict guidelines that the police must follow to ensure that they are using this tool legally and ethically. In this article, we’ll take a closer look at how Penal Code 631 PC is applied in law enforcement investigations, what requirements the police must fulfill to tap a phone legally, and what your rights are if you are charged with a crime based on wiretap evidence that was not obtained in keeping with those requirements.
Law enforcement officers are the group with the most motivation to set wiretaps. A wiretap would give them the chance to “spy” on people they suspect of committing a crime, and could provide them with the compelling evidence they need to make an arrest. However, wiretapping is only permitted within legal limits on when and how it can be done.
To tap a phone line legally, police officers must obtain an order from a judge allowing them to do so. The court may only issue this order if the following elements are involved:
Probable cause exists that someone is committing, has committed, or is about to commit any of a limited list of serious felonies
Probable cause that the wiretap will actually lead law enforcement officials to overhear particular communications concerning the illegal activity can be demonstrated.
Probable cause that the place where the wire is located is being used or will be used to commit the offense, or else belongs to or is commonly used by the person whose communications will be intercepted can be demonstrated.
Customary investigative procedures that don’t use wiretaps have been tried and have failed, or appear unlikely to succeed if they are tried, or will be too dangerous if they are attempted.
It is also worth noting that the maximum length of time a wiretap order may be in effect is ten days from the date of the order, or thirty days from the date communication was first intercepted, whichever comes first. Police can then file for an extension of the original order, which also won’t be longer than another thirty days.
If an application for an order authorizing a wiretap that will intercept your communications has been made by law enforcement officials, they are obligated to notify you in most cases, even if the application was rejected. Notification is not an obligation until after the authorized period for the wiretap is expired. Additionally, the only information they are required to give you is the date of the order authorizing the wiretap, the period during which the wiretapping was authorized, and whether or not your communications were actually intercepted.
You have a right to file a motion with the judge who granted the wiretapping order asking to inspect the original application, the order, and the intercepted communications. That said, the judge is not obligated to honor your request. Furthermore, if your request is indeed honored, what portions of those materials you are granted access to is at his or her discretion.
On the other hand, if you are charged with a crime in connection to the wiretap, then you would get all of it during discovery. You may file a Penal Code 1538.5 “Motion to Suppress Evidence” if any of the legal wiretap requirements were not met by law enforcement.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.