Spodek Law Group handles tough cases
nationwide, that demand excellence.
Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 10th March 2023, 03:08 pm
As travelers, we may not realize the severity of violence or life-threatening damage that can occur at international airports. However, federal law imposes severe penalties on those who commit such heinous acts. Title 18 U.S. Code § 37 specifically addresses violence at international airports and outlines the consequences for those who engage in such actions.
Title 18 U.S. Code § 37 is a federal law that states anyone who unlawfully and intentionally uses any “device, substance, or weapon” to perform an act of violence at an international airport can face up to 20 years in federal prison. If someone dies as a result of these actions, the perpetrator could even face life imprisonment.
Under the same federal law, destroying or seriously damaging airport facilities or disrupting airport services can also result in imprisonment and fines. The prohibited activity falls under the jurisdiction of the United States if the act occurs within or outside of the country and if the perpetrator is later found within the U.S. or is a national as defined in the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Title 18 U.S. Code § 37 is the United States’ implementation of the Montreal Convention, which is also known as the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation. This multilateral treaty was created in response to the terrorist acts that occurred at airports in Rome and Vienna in 1985. The Montreal Convention has become the international standard for preventing and punishing violence at international airports worldwide. It applies only to civil aviation and not to military or law enforcement.
A person is guilty of a federal offense under Title 18 U.S. Code § 37 if they intentionally commit an act of violence that causes or could cause serious bodily injury or willfully destroy or cause serious damage to international airport facilities or an out-of-service civil aircraft. The violence must also endanger or likely to endanger safety at the airport.
It’s crucial to note that attempting or conspiring to commit this crime is treated as if the perpetrator succeeded. In other words, if someone attempts an act of violence at an international airport but is caught before carrying it out, they can still face the same penalties as if they had succeeded. It’s also important to mention that one could be charged and convicted of this crime even if it occurred outside of the United States.
Are you thinking of committing violence or causing life-threatening damage at an international airport? Think again. Federal law has severe penalties in place for such actions. Title 18 U.S. Code § 37 covers the regulations and consequences for violent acts committed at international airports, and it’s not a law to be taken lightly.
Under this law, a person who unlawfully and intentionally performs an act of violence using any “device, substance, or weapon” at an international airport could face up to 20 years in federal prison. If someone dies due to the violence, the perpetrator could even face life imprisonment. Section 18 U.S.C. 37 says that anyone who destroys or seriously damages airport facilities, disrupts airport services, or endangers safety at an airport could be fined and imprisoned.
Title 18 U.S.C. 37 is the United States’ implementation of the Montreal Convention, which was created to suppress unlawful acts against the safety of civil aviation. The treaty was created in response to terrorist acts that occurred at airports in Rome and Vienna in 1985. The treaty has been ratified by 176 nations, including the United States, and has become the standard international protocol for preventing and punishing violence at international airports worldwide. However, the Montreal Convention only applies to civil aviation and not to aviation associated with military or law enforcement.
A person is guilty of a federal offense under Title 18 U.S. Code 37 if they commit an act of violence against another person on the grounds of an international airport, which causes or could cause serious bodily injury or willfully and intentionally destroy or cause serious damage to international airport facilities or an out-of-service civil aircraft. The violence must also endanger or be likely to endanger safety at the airport. Attempting or conspiring to commit this crime is treated as if the person succeeded, and they will face the same penalties if convicted.
The law was amended in 1996 to include extraterritorial jurisdiction, meaning a person can be convicted in the United States of committing violence at an international airport outside the U.S. if the perpetrator or one of the victims is a U.S. national and the perpetrator was discovered and apprehended on U.S. soil after the incident.
In conclusion, it’s essential to remember that violence at international airports is not only illegal, but it’s also dangerous and can have severe consequences. The penalties for violating Title 18 U.S. Code § 37 are harsh, and attempting or conspiring to commit this crime carries the same punishment as if the person succeeded. So, before you think about committing an act of violence at an international airport, remember that the law has its eyes on you, and it will not be lenient.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.