Spodek Law Group handles tough cases
nationwide, that demand excellence.
Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 19th March 2023, 01:34 am
California law views it as a serious offense if a person willingly fails to appear in court when required, as defined by Penal Code 1320 & 1320.5 PC. Failure to appear for a felony charge is a felony offense, while failure to appear for a misdemeanor charge is a misdemeanor crime.
If a defendant is released on “own recognizance,” the law applies to them. Additionally, PC 1320.5 applies to a defendant’s failure to appear when they have been charged or convicted of a felony, and they have been released on bail. Failure to appear in such cases is viewed as a crime, and a defendant can face charges accordingly.
Penal Code 1320 PC prohibits a person from willfully failing to appear in court when required to do so. To convict someone under this statute, the prosecutor must prove the following things:
The defendant was charged with or convicted of a misdemeanor or a felony
The defendant willfully failed to appear in court as directed
The defendant did so to avoid the court process
The defendant was released from custody on their own recognizance
The term “willfully” means that the person deliberately committed the criminal act, in this case, failing to show up for a court date, with the intention of breaking the law.
Penal Code 1320 applies when a person has been released from custody on their own recognizance, an “O.R. release.” In this case, a judge allows the defendant to leave custody without posting bail.
Under an O.R. release, the defendant must sign a written agreement with the court in which they agree to appear in court when directed, not leave the state without the court’s permission, waive extradition if they fail to make an appearance and are apprehended outside California, recognize that they have been informed of the repercussions of breaching the terms of release, and heed all reasonable conditions imposed by the court.
If a judge refuses an O.R. release, they may set bail and detain the defendant until they post bail. If the defendant posts bail, they are said to have been released from custody on bail. If they can’t afford to post bail, they will remain in detention.
Failing to appear in court can lead to serious legal consequences, such as fines, probation, or even jail time, depending on the type of charge involved. If a person fails to appear in court for a traffic ticket, their license may be suspended, and an arrest warrant may be issued. Additionally, immigration consequences may be imposed if a person fails to appear in court.
There are legal defenses that a defendant can use to fight a failure to appear charge, such as mistaken identity or an emergency that prevented them from appearing in court. If a person is convicted of a failure to appear charge, it can affect their gun rights. However, they may be eligible for expungement under certain circumstances.
Failing to appear in court can have serious legal consequences. If you’re facing a failure to appear charge, it’s essential to seek the help of an experienced criminal defense attorney.
Penal Code 1320.5 PC is a California law that makes it a crime for a defendant charged with or convicted of a felony and released on bail to fail to appear in court. The failure to appear in court willfully is a felony offense that carries severe consequences, including a maximum fine of $10,000, imprisonment in a county jail for a maximum of three years, or a state prison prosecutor sentence for a maximum of three years.
If you’re facing charges under PC 1320, you can raise three common defenses. The first one is the “No willful act” defense, which states that the accused party is only guilty if he or she willfully failed to appear in court. It’s a strong legal defense to show that you didn’t act willfully but rather forgot about the court date.
The second defense is the “No attempt to evade the court process” defense, which states that a defendant is only guilty of breaching PC 1320 if they failed to appear in court with the intention of avoiding the court process. You can raise this defense by showing that you didn’t attempt to avoid the court process by not appearing and had a valid reason like an emergency.
The third defense is the “Falsely accused” defense, which is valid if the defendant is falsely accused of violating Penal Code 1320.
If the defendant is charged with or convicted of a misdemeanor, failure to appear in court is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail for a maximum of six months and/or a fine of up to $1,000.
If the defendant is charged with or convicted of a felony, failure to appear in court is a felony punishable by a fine of up to $5,000, imprisonment in county jail for a maximum of one year, or a state prison sentence of 16 months, two years, or a maximum of three years.
A person convicted under PC 1320 can try to get the offense expunged by completing probation or serving a jail term. An expunged conviction doesn’t need to be disclosed to potential employers. PC 1203.4 authorizes an expungement for a misdemeanor or felony offense as long as the applicant successfully completes probation, is not currently on probation, charged with a criminal offense, or serving a sentence for a criminal offense.
A conviction for failure to appear under Penal Code 1320 does not automatically impact a person’s gun rights. However, some felony and misdemeanor convictions may result in the defendant losing their gun rights in California, and some misdemeanors carry a 10-year firearm ban.
Three other laws are associated with failure to appear in court: Failure to appear – California Vehicle Code 40508VC, Fines for failure to appear – California Penal Code 1214.1PC, and Hold on a driver’s license – California Vehicle Code 40509.5VC.
Contact Spodek Law Group for a free, confidential consultation in-office or by phone. We serve clients throughout California, including the San Fernando Valley, Pasadena, San Bernardino, Rancho Cucamonga, Long Beach, Riverside, San Diego, Oakland, the San Francisco Bay area, Orange County, Sonoma County, Ventura, Sacramento, San Jose, and the greater Los Angeles area.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.