Spodek Law Group handles tough cases
nationwide, that demand excellence.
Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Imagine the weight of the world crashing down on you as you receive a federal grand jury subpoena. It is a haunting reminder that you, or someone you know or were affiliated with, are now the target of a federal criminal investigation by the prestigious Department of Justice. But what does this subpoena truly mean? The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution mandates the use of a grand jury for all capital and infamous crimes, and in practice, all federal felonies must be indicted by a grand jury unless a defendant waives the right and instead pleads to a so-called “Information.” Imagine yourself standing before a panel of 16-23 individuals, all determining if probable cause exists to secure an indictment. But remember, a grand jury does not decide if someone is actually guilty, all people indicted by a grand jury are considered innocent until they either plead guilty to the offense or are proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt at trial. The stakes have never been higher, and the future uncertain.
Picture yourself as a citizen chosen to serve on a grand jury, hand-picked by the courts to determine the fate of your fellow citizens. The process of choosing a grand jury is much like choosing a petit or trial jury, but grand juries hold a greater responsibility. They sit for an extended period of time, meticulously reviewing numerous cases, while a petit jury sits for the duration of a single trial. The secrecy of the grand jury is of the utmost importance, and they hold the power to issue a subpoena for documents and grand jury witness testimony that will aid in their evaluation of the case. These subpoenas are issued at the request of the government and the subpoenaed materials are returned to the grand jury to further their investigation.
Throughout the United States, there are hundreds of grand juries, some federal districts have more than one sitting at one time, while smaller districts will employ only one. They meet on a schedule determined by the district in which they sit. Some may meet every two weeks or every month, depending on the criminal case-load that exists in their particular district. In one day, the jury can hear numerous cases and at the end of the session, they will vote to either approve the indictment (True Bill) or disapprove of the indictment (No Bill). If a True Bill is returned, they have determined that probable cause exists to believe that the stated crime has been committed, and at this point, the individual(s) named in the indictment are officially charged with a crime.
But what is a grand jury subpoena? When conducting grand jury investigations, the U.S. Attorney’s Office has a number of investigative tools at its disposal, one of which is the grand jury subpoena. Despite its name, this type of subpoena is issued by the U.S. Attorney’s Office, not the grand jury, and they have the power to issue these subpoenas without the need for judicial approval.
When it comes to receiving a grand jury subpoena, it’s important to understand the different roles and potential consequences of being a witness, subject, or target. A “target” is a person whom the prosecutor or jury has substantial evidence linking to the commission of a crime and who the prosecutor believes is a likely defendant. An employee or officer of an organization who is a target is not automatically considered a target themselves, even if their conduct contributed to the crime committed by the organization. A “subject” of an investigation is a person whose conduct is within the scope of the grand jury’s investigation, and falls somewhere between a “target” and a “witness” in terms of criminal exposure. A “witness” is an individual who may have information that law enforcement believes could be relevant to a criminal investigation to help prove guilt or innocence.
At the end of the grand jury’s investigation, the goal is to end up with an indictment against a defendant or defendants. Anyone involved in the grand jury process must understand the danger of ending up being charged.
A federal grand jury subpoena is a formal request for testimony, documents, or both issued by a federal district court judge at the request of a federal prosecutor. It is a tool used by prosecutors to gather enough evidence for the grand jury to conclude that there is probable cause to believe the suspect has committed a federal crime. There are two types of federal grand jury subpoenas: one that requests testimony and may also require the production of records supporting the testimony, and one that requires the production of records.
Upon being served with a federal grand jury subpoena, it’s important to review it in detail and assess the burden it imposes. Preparing testimony and collecting documents in response to the subpoena require different strategic and targeted approaches. Additionally, federal grand jury subpoenas can be challenged on limited grounds, but it’s important to seek legal counsel before taking any action.
When faced with a federal grand jury subpoena duces tecum, the burden of responding can be overwhelming. These subpoenas often request years worth of documents, described in general terms, and for corporations and other businesses, responding can require significant internal and external resources.
Responding to a federal subpoena duces tecum involves producing all hardcopy and electronic records within the subpoenaed party’s custody or control. The task of responding will usually be assigned to the organization’s records custodian, who must determine which documents and files need to be produced. This can include tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands or even millions of files.
It’s important to acquire an understanding of the scope of the universe of responsive documents as quickly as possible, including what is on-site, in the cloud, in off-site storage, or scheduled for destruction. It’s also important to not hand over files wholesale, as it can be considered non-compliant and the government can use them for other investigations.
While gathering and preparing responsive documents, it’s important to determine whether there are grounds to challenge the subpoena through formal or informal means. This includes filing a motion to quash or negotiating the scope of the subpoena with the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Negotiated reductions in scope are common, as the U.S. attorney’s office may not have an appreciation for the burden imposed by the subpoena. It’s important to seek legal counsel to determine the best course of action.
When faced with a subpoena from a grand jury, there are three potential paths to take: comply, challenge, or ignore. However, it’s important to understand that compliance is not a choice, but a legal mandate. Many individuals opt to follow the guidance of their lawyers and fully comply with the subpoena’s demands. But compliance alone may not always be the best course of action. Especially in situations where the subpoena requests incriminating or a vast amount of information, or information that the individual does not possess, it may be wise to partially challenge the subpoena.
Challenging a subpoena from a grand jury requires legal representation to file a motion to quash with the court and argue that the subpoena does not adhere to the relevant rules and procedures. For example, it can be argued that the individual subpoenaed has no connection to the case, that they do not possess the requested information, that the subpoena requires the revelation of privileged and confidential information, or that it infringes upon the individual’s constitutional rights by being overly broad, burdensome, or intrusive. In such cases, the court may limit the scope of the subpoena or render it null and void, making compliance unnecessary.
Ignoring a subpoena from a federal grand jury, however, is a risky decision. The prosecutor acting on behalf of the grand jury may ask the court to hold the individual in civil contempt for refusing to comply with the subpoena. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, the court may order jail time until compliance is ensured or until the Grand Jury’s term ends – whichever comes first.
It’s imperative to weigh your options carefully when dealing with a subpoena from a grand jury, as the consequences of non-compliance can be severe. It’s always best to seek legal counsel to understand your rights and responsibilities and make the best decision for your situation.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.