Spodek Law Group handles tough cases
nationwide, that demand excellence.
Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 2nd June 2023, 05:30 pm
Navigating federal criminal appeals can be confusing and challenging. Most clients, and even some attorneys, may have limited experience with federal appellate practice. In this article, Todd Spodek and the Spodek Law Group, explain federal criminal appeals and provide answers to common questions for those considering this legal process.
Federal criminal appeals: What they are, how they work, what the benefits are in filing, and potential risks of learning the system from a legal expert.
Federal courts and methods for federal criminal appeals allow you to focus on the legal inaccuracies committed in the original trial. Click to learn the process and the pitfalls.
People initially assume that an appeal is a chance to reopen the facts developed at trial. A federal criminal appeal or direct appeal is actually a legal proceeding in which the judgment or order of the court (usually a district court) is challenged on the basis of an alleged legal error or errors.
It is important to remember the factual record of a case remains unchanged after arriving at the appeals court. A qualified appellate attorney who is well versed in legal research is crucial to meet the technical requirements of the court and give detailed citations to statutes, evidence, and past cases referencing the proceeding.
A notice of appeal is filed within 14 days of the entry of the judgment or order being appealed.
A common misconception is the assumption that the similarly named “notice of appeal” and the actual appeal itself are indistinct entities. In actuality, a notice of appeal is a relatively straightforward process – this one or two-page document signals to the expressing intent to appeal. Swiftly filing a legal retainer is prudent given the 14-day requirement as subsequent filings involve greater detail of the case.
Bear in mind that federal criminal appeals consume time; cases on appeal in the federal system take around a year. Court processes tend to be sluggish as individual judges closely study, analyze and consider the presented arguments, in which caseloads per enforcer can influence resolution times simultaneously.
A significant proportion of federal appellate cases, 74 percent in 2019, are resolved “on the briefs”, as their content is the most important part of the valid appeal. This leads to three significant types of briefs to consider when refining critical arguments; an opening brief or principal brief sets up the proposed argument alongside the interpretation of the facts of the presented case, after which the responding responsive appellate brief takes the opposing government side of the case with fact-based counteraccuracy, leading the appellant to file their marked reply brief.
With findings for cases commonly known as legal precedent, what results is an incomparable system relying primarily on clear distinctions between legal thinking and historical mistakes.
As an attorney, we want the opportunity to reinforce our case via greater detail and argument alongside bipartisan approval.
Oral argument before a panel of judges is seen to be instrumental in convincing the court of contention for legal precedent, especially in criminal cases. With commonly answered questions relevant to public law, legal theory and past rulings, an oral argument presents an essential opportunity to argue eloquently persuading judges simultaneously with fellow representation.
Often, small technical errors can lead to aggravating results on failed motions prior to and including the appeal process .Procedural failures are an age-old reason for appellate courts to decline to correct error. This emphasizes the importance of preserving error and diligently recording case evidence in a meaningful way at the district court level. Appellate review relies upon accurate input, identifying that correct procedure was followed in the original trial, primarily the rulings made by the trial judge.
Appeals become increasingly more expensive the more complicated the case or the district proceedings Costs remain true throughout as litigators retry cases, examine responses closely and increase the case workload within individual cases. With many appeals reaching medium times, multiple two-sided appeals may flow continuously-resulting in costs associated with presenting or dismissing certain orders. While trial transcripts traditionally act as documentation that warrants additional thousands of dollars, record excerpts seek to reduce costs errand.
The trial courts presume when an appropriate or impartial order or case is placed for appeal review, each appellate relies heavily on listening through accurate research and examination of wrongdoing/error in the specification of cases contained in prior documents or convictions . With trial courts acting vigilantly, erroneous rulings will come before appeal courts and test whether ethical procedure was followed throughout legislation.
Todd Spodek is the founder and Managing Partner of the Spodek Law Group. He is a highly knowledgeable criminal defense attorney in New York with extensive experience in both federal and state criminal law. Winnings recognitions numerous times for the success he achieves in the area of criminal appeals, along with outstanding client service are proof of his commitment to excellence.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.