Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 28th July 2023, 07:22 pm
International trade is undeniably the lifeblood of the economy, offering tantalizing opportunities for countless U.S. businesses. However, this vast and alluring world of commerce also conceals numerous risks that, if left unchecked, can lead to administrative, criminal, or even civil proceedings. Take a deep breath and pay close attention, because if you find yourself in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) or other statutes governing international trade, you may face devastating criminal charges of corruption.
The FCPA is an unnervingly powerful law, equipping federal prosecutors with the authority to target corporations and individuals alike in myriad circumstances. The pulsating heart of most litigation lies in accusations of corruption involving foreign government contracts. But companies can also face corruption charges based on how they import and export goods.
Criminal charges can emerge from bribery directed at U.S. officials, potentially ensnaring even companies not directly involved in a corruption or bribery case but who deal with foreign entities that are. This underscores the indispensability of performing due diligence before signing an international supplier or distributor.
The FCPA casts a wide net, covering every legal “person” in the U.S., including business entities and individuals, as well as certain publicly-traded foreign companies. If any transaction involves the transportation of goods across borders, coupled with a bribe or an attempt to influence a foreign official, it can be criminally prosecuted under the FCPA.
An initial inquiry might escalate to dire charges, and if the targeted entity is convicted, they could face astronomical fines $5 million for individuals, and a staggering $25 million for businesses. Moreover, individuals could be exposed to a maximum of 20 years in federal prison. FCPA prosecutions may also entail consequences such as injunctions, disgorgements, forfeitures, and even debarment from doing business with governments.
Companies can tremble at the thought of criminal prosecution stemming from their import and export capabilities. These charges could relate to one of two broad categories: internal interactions with foreign officials or relationships with third parties that interact with foreign officials.
Internal foreign interactions represent one of the most direct pathways to criminal charges. Instances arise when personnel within a company engage with foreign officials. In import and export-related cases, multiple people may be involved at various levels, each foreign interaction presenting a potential corruption hazard.
Some corruption may be deliberate, such as when an employee solicits or accepts a bribe. However, employees may unintentionally breach FCPA regulations, often due to the absence of anti-corruption training that highlights potential risks and red flags.
Exacerbating the situation is the income disparity between often underpaid foreign officials and much wealthier company executives. Certain officials may be particularly susceptible to the influence of executives, who may be ignorant to the fact that the benefits and inflated payments requested are, in fact, illegal bribes.
Your company may not engage in corrupt dealings, but that doesn’t mean you’re safe. If your company affiliates with a third party that engages in corrupt dealings with foreign officials on your behalf, you can still be held responsible. Corruption can manifest in customs brokers, consulting firms, freight forwarders, import agents, and export agents. If a company delegates their foreign interactions to a third party and said party engages in bribery, the company could be held liable.
Although companies can attempt to distance themselves from third parties by adjusting contractual language, this protection is often illusory, insufficient to deter the government from pursuing criminal prosecutions.
Additional statutes present their own chilling risks for prosecution. Charges may arise for influencing or bribing public officials, especially customs and border officials, potentially leading to a 15-year prison sentence. Conspiring to defraud the U.S. may also lead to charges, even in cases where no successful bribe occurred but a plan existed for one to transpire.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.