Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 19th October 2023, 07:26 pm
Finding the right lawyer can be tough. Where do you even start looking? Many people turn to attorney advertisements to find legal help. But are those ads telling the whole story? Let’s break down what attorney advertising disclaimers mean, so you can make an informed decision.
An attorney advertising disclaimer is a statement lawyers have to include on any advertisements about their services. It basically says: “This is an ad.” The goal is to avoid misleading the public. Disclaimers became mandatory after the Supreme Court case Bates v. State Bar of Arizona in 1977, which said bans on lawyer ads violate free speech. Before that, the legal profession prohibited attorney ads altogether. Nowadays, ads are allowed but regulated.
Each state has rules about what disclaimers must say. Common requirements are:
So in an attorney ad, you may see text like: “This is an advertisement for legal services. John Doe, 123 Main St, Anytown, CA. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.”
The goal of disclaimers is consumer protection. Without them, ads could be deceptive. Imagine a commercial saying, “Call John Doe to win your case! He never loses!” That makes it sound like hiring that lawyer guarantees victory. But no attorney wins every case. Disclaimers aim to prevent false expectations.
State bar associations also want to uphold ethics. The legal profession has rules against misleading statements that bring disrepute. As the American Bar Association says, “A lawyer shall not make a false or misleading communication about the lawyer or the lawyer’s services.” Disclaimers help lawyers advertise without crossing ethical lines.
When you see attorney ads, keep these tips in mind:
The bottom line? Attorney ads can help your search, but look beyond the marketing hype. Focus on credentials, client reviews and a lawyer’s ability to explain your case. Disclaimers aim to avoid deception – but doing your homework is still key.
What happens if an attorney ad crosses the line into false advertising? Each state’s bar association can pursue discipline. For example, in Florida a personal injury law firm called The Rothstein Law Group ran a dramatic commercial about a case they handled. It described a car accident where a tire blowout caused devastating injuries. According to the Florida Bar, the real case involved minor injuries from running over a curb. The firm was suspended and fined $6 million for false advertising.
In New York, a law called the Deceptive Attorney Advertising Law increased penalties for false ads. Now lawyers can lose their license for misrepresenting credentials or past results. The goal is to crack down on ads that mislead or manipulate consumers. Critics argue the law is unconstitutional for limiting free speech. But supporters say it protects people from predatory attorneys.
Where is the line between aggressive marketing and deception? Each state decides based on their rules of professional conduct. But if an ad seems wildly implausible, misleading information could be a red flag.
What other limits do attorney ads face besides disclaimers? It varies by state, but some common constraints include:
However, First Amendment rights still protect truthful, non-deceptive ads. Attorneys have won lawsuits challenging total bans on types of advertising. Restrictions aim to balance consumer protection with free speech.
Despite risks like misleading claims, attorney ads also have benefits. They:
The challenge is finding the right balance. Disclaimers aim to ensure ads educate without deceiving. But consumers still need to look past the hype.
What’s your take? Are attorney ads helpful for finding lawyers or just glorified sales tactics? Disclaimers try to avoid deception, but some critics think ads should still face tighter restrictions. However, banning ads completely could violate free speech. There are good arguments on both sides. What do you think is the best approach?
It can be hard to identify false attorney advertising. Ads are meant to put a law firm’s skills in the best light. But some tactics clearly cross the line. Here are examples state bars have disciplined:
The key in each case was making objectively false or grossly misleading claims. Subjective opinions like “the best lawyer in town” have more leeway. But attorneys cross a line when misrepresenting credentials, results and relationships with clients. Watch for unverifiable superlatives that seem too good to be true. And focus your search on substantive factors, not just advertising hype.
What about subjective opinions and exaggeration in attorney ads? Lawyers have some latitude for “puffery.” These statements aren’t meant to be taken literally, though they still must be truthful. For example:
These vague claims are meant to be persuasive, not factual. The line gets crossed if specifics are provably false. States also restrict subjective superlatives like “the best lawyers in America” that clients may interpret as literal. But dramatic opinions aren’t necessarily misrepresentations. Context matters – consider what a reasonable person would take away from the ad.
Can attorney ads mention past case results? Many do highlight big verdicts or settlements. States restrict misleading references, but some details are allowed. For example, New York says ads can state:
But ads can’t imply those results are typical. Disclaimers like “past outcomes don’t guarantee future results” are required. And details that identify clients may violate confidentiality. Like other ad claims, references to past cases invite skepticism. Success depends on specifics of the case, not just a lawyer’s general skills. Consider past results, but look at them in context rather than taking them at face value.
What about using client reviews or endorsements in attorney advertising? Many states prohibit or restrict testimonials to avoid misleading impressions. For example, New York bars ads from stating a client’s “specific description or characterization of the quality of the lawyer’s services or skills.” General statements like “Client focused, caring law firm” don’t directly quote an endorsement, so they may be permitted. And reviews on independent sites are usually allowed since they aren’t directly controlled by the attorney.
The concern is cherry-picking glowing reviews that paint an unrealistic picture for prospective clients. People interpret personal stories differently than general claims. But ethics rules say lawyers can’t pay for recommendations or use reviews that are unrepresentative. As always, the best approach is caution about any ad information, even testimonials. Check independent sources like bar association reviews rather than relying on ads alone.
How much do lawyers spend on advertising? For personal injury firms, millions per year in some cases. The average annual budget for attorney ads is $200,000. For the top spending law firms, that climbs to over $2 million. Those ads appear online, on billboards, TV, radio, in print and other formats. Is this level of advertising spend worth it?
Many lawyers say it is. Advertising helps them attract clients in a competitive market. It also allows smaller firms to gain name recognition compared to big firms with established reputations. But other attorneys think money is better spent on legal work itself, not marketing. They avoid ads and rely on referrals or search engine optimization instead. As a consumer, you ultimately vote with your choice of lawyer. But don’t pick based on who spends the most on advertising alone.
So how should you go about finding the right lawyer? Ads can be part of your research process. But experts recommend:
Focus your search on actual qualifications and client experiences, not just persuasive advertising. Disclaimers aim to avoid deception. But doing due diligence remains important when choosing legal counsel.
Finding the right attorney is a big decision. Advertising offers one way to learn about options, but has risks like misleading claims. Disclaimers try to prevent deception, though some argue for tighter restrictions. It’s an ongoing balance between consumer protection and free speech. But the bottom line remains: look beyond the hype when choosing a lawyer. Focus on real experience, client feedback and your own gut instinct.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.