Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 28th July 2023, 07:17 pm
A permanent injunction refers to any court order that requires an entity or individual to take certain actions or refrain from participation in certain activities. Permanent injunctions will normally be issued after a lawsuit regarding an underlying activity has reached its conclusion.
Permanent injunctions are different from preliminary injunctions. A preliminary injunction is issued at the beginning of a lawsuit proceeding, and it often exists on a temporary basis. Permanent injunctions, on the other hand, refer to the resolution of a lawsuit. If the defendant was found to be guilty of unlawfully participating in an activity, a permanent injunction is a permanent order to stop. Alternatively, if the defendant was found to owe the plaintiff reparations or back payment, the permanent injunction would make the payment requirements clear.
Injunctions are powerful tools in the court system. If a party refuses to comply with the terms of the injunction, they may be fined, arrested, or even face prison time. Prison time usually isn’t a factor in civil negotiations, but it can be one in cases where domestic violence was involved.
An injunction is a remnant of English common law, and finds historical roots as early as the fourteenth century. Before injunctions began to appear in English law, similar orders were a part of Roman law. An ancient Egyptian tablet is inscribed with legal means to restore the assets of a party whose rights had been violated.
The Relationship Between Permanent Injunctions and Lawsuit Rulings
When a permanent injunction is handed down, it’s usually part of the final ruling of a lawsuit. These are the most powerful types of injunctions due to their permanent status. The court will order an activity to either continue or cease on a permanent basis. Depending on the case, a preliminary injunction’s terms might be continued into a permanent injunction.
One example of this would be if a lawsuit was brought against a person for violating copyright law. The preliminary injunction might order the person to stop selling creative material that belonged to the plaintiff. This injunction is meant to be a temporary measure that fixes the problem while litigation occurs.
If the defendant was found to be not guilty of misusing intellectual property, the preliminary injunction would be lifted, and they would be free to continue their activity. However, if the defendant was found guilty, the judge may turn the preliminary injunction into a permanent injunction. The defendant would then be permanently banned from participating in their misuse of intellectual property.
The media doesn’t tend to focus much on permanent injunctions. This may be because permanent injunctions are considered to be just part of the sentence, and so people don’t often acknowledge that they’re an “injunction.”
There was an example of an injunction in media in 2013. Apple petitioned a federal court to place a permanent injunction against the company Samsung, in order to prevent Samsung product sales that infringed on Apple’s copyrights. If the injunction was granted, Samsung would permanently lose the ability to sell those products.
In the world of business litigation, injunctions might be brought against both individuals and businesses. Business owners might be faced with a permanent injunction if they’re found to be personally at fault following a lawsuit. But if their company’s practices and policies were at fault, the judge would issue the injunction against the company instead.
When Injunctions Are Issued
There are four main factors that a court will consider when they decide whether or not to issue an injunction:
Will irreparable harm be done to the party requesting the injunction if their request isn’t granted? This factor comes into play more often with temporary injunctions in domestic violence cases than with permanent injunctions.
What choice will best preserve balance between the two parties? Would issuing an injunction harm the defendant, or would failing to issue one harm the plaintiff?
Is the injunction request based on a potentially successful case? Where permanent injunctions are concerned, the case has already been successful.
Will an injunction have a positive or negative effect on the public? This is especially relevant if there is a lot of media buzz and PR associated with the case.
When Do You Need a Permanent Injunctions Lawyer?
A permanent injunction represents the end part of a case. This means that you’ve been involved in a long-winded lawsuit already. You should have an experienced attorney on retainer, especially if they’re representing your business. An ideal litigation lawyer will have a history of successful lawsuit negotiations.
If a permanent injunction is issued against you, and the lawsuit’s final ruling is complete, you may be entitled to an appeal process. The exact details will depend on the circumstances surrounding the case. Your lawyer can explain whether you have any options going forward. If you aren’t able to appeal, your lawyer will help you understand the terms of the permanent injunction, including plans for how to uphold it.
If you’re seeking to have a permanent injunction filed against another party, you need a lawyer with experience litigating strong cases. They’ll need to know how to gather evidence to support your claims and make a convincing case to the judge. They’ll also need to know how to negotiate with the other involved parties. Before the lawsuit process begins, your attorney might be able to make the defendant stop by sending a cease and desist letter.
Understanding Permanent Injunctions In Depth
A permanent injunction is a highly authoritative court order, compelling an individual or entity to carry out certain tasks or abstain from certain activities. Typically issued at the end of a lawsuit, these powerful orders bear significant weight in safeguarding legal rights and interests of the parties involved.
It is crucial to discern the distinction between permanent injunctions and preliminary injunctions. While the former serves as a lawsuit’s final resolution, the latter comes into play at the beginning of legal proceedings and often has a temporary effect.
For instance, in a lawsuit involving copyright infringement, a preliminary injunction might temporarily require the defendant to cease the sale of creative material that rightfully belongs to the plaintiff. If the defendant is found innocent, the injunction will be lifted. However, if found guilty, the judge may convert the preliminary injunction into a permanent one, resulting in a lifetime ban on the defendant’s misuse of intellectual property.
When a permanent injunction is handed down, it typically forms an integral part of the lawsuit’s final ruling. It exerts significant force due to its perpetual existence, explicitly ordering an activity to continue or forever cease, depending on the case’s context and decision.
Though not widely discussed in media, there have been instances where permanent injunctions grabbed headlines. A notable example unfolded in 2013 when Apple filed a petition in federal court, seeking a permanent injunction against Samsung for selling products that infringed on Apple’s intellectual property rights. Had the injunction passed, Samsung would have faced a permanent ban on selling those specific products.
In the world of business litigation, injunctions could be employed against both individuals and enterprises. Company owners might find themselves facing a permanent injunction if they proved personally at fault in a lawsuit. Conversely, if the company’s policies and practices were the cause of the issue, the injunction would be directed at the firm itself.
Courts consider the following four crucial factors when deciding on whether to issue an injunction:
Since a permanent injunction denotes the final stage of a case, you have likely undergone a lengthy, strenuous legal battle. Having an experienced attorney on your side is essential, particularly if the dispute concerns your business. The ideal litigation lawyer will possess a track record of successful lawsuit negotiations and outcomes.
Should a permanent injunction be issued against you, and the lawsuit reaches its conclusion, an appeals process might be available, depending on the specific case. A knowledgeable lawyer can clarify your options and help you understand the injunction’s terms and the strategies to comply with them.
Conversely, if you seek to file a permanent injunction against another party, it is imperative to enlist a lawyer with a proven background in litigating robust cases. The attorney should demonstrate prowess in gathering relevant evidence, presenting a persuasive case to the judge, and adeptly negotiating with other parties involved. Prior to initiating the lawsuit, the attorney may be able to halt the defendant’s actions by issuing a cease and desist letter.
In conclusion, permanent injunctions play a remarkably influential role in protecting your rights and interests against unlawful actions. Engaging a skilled, experienced permanent injunctions lawyer is fundamental in navigating the intricate legal landscape and ensuring that justice serves you. Don’t hesitate to take this critical step in securing a favorable outcome in your legal battle.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.