Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 17th October 2023, 05:44 pm
Wire fraud is when you use the phone, internet, or electronic communications to commit fraud. For example, emailing fake invoices to customers or making false statements over the phone to get money. Federal wire fraud means the FBI and U.S. attorneys are handling the case since it involves interstate communications.
The legal definition of wire fraud is using wire communications to execute a scheme to defraud or obtain money under false pretenses. The key elements the prosecution must prove are:
Penalties for wire fraud are up to 20 years in prison and massive fines. So this is serious business. The feds don’t mess around with white collar crime.
An experienced white collar defense attorney can fight federal wire fraud charges using several strategies. Here are some of the most common ways lawyers defend clients in these cases:
A lot of wire fraud cases depend on electronic evidence like emails, phone records, and financial statements. The attorney will scrutinize this evidence to find holes that create reasonable doubt. For example, showing that certain emails were altered or the client’s phone was used by someone else that day. When the evidence has problems, its harder for prosecutors to prove intent and furtherance of a fraudulent scheme.
An essential element of wire fraud is intent to defraud. The defense lawyer will argue the client never intended to commit fraud and the communications were innocent mistakes or misunderstandings. For example, claiming the client used industry jargon that outsiders misinterpreted as fraudulent statements. Or showing the client relied on bad advice from others. By arguing lack of criminal intent, the attorney can defeat the charges.
The government must also prove there was a scheme to defraud in place. The lawyer may claim the client’s communications were not part of any organized fraudulent effort. If the evidence shows a few stray false statements instead of an overarching scheme, its much harder to convict on wire fraud.
Defense lawyers scrutinize how the government collected evidence and built the case. Violations of constitutional rights like illegal searches, seizures, or self-incrimination can result in evidence being excluded. For example, if the feds got phone records without a warrant, the lawyer can seek to suppress that evidence and weaken the prosecution’s case.
Many wire fraud cases end in plea bargains instead of trials. The attorney negotiates with the prosecution for reduced charges or sentencing recommendations in exchange for the defendant’s guilty plea. This avoids the risk and expense of trial. But the lawyer has to secure a fair deal that minimizes penalties.
In addition to the above general defense strategies, lawyers employ more specific defenses tailored to the facts of each wire fraud case. Some examples include:
Showing the client relied on financial, legal, or other expert advice that led to the questionable communications. This can negate intent by proving the client thought the actions were proper based on the expert consultation.
Arguing the client used the money obtained by fraud for personal expenses instead of business purposes. While unethical, courts have ruled personal use alone does not always constitute wire fraud. This defense attempts to place the actions outside the legal definition of the crime.
Demonstrating the client did not actually benefit from the alleged fraudulent representations. If the communications did not result in direct financial gain, its harder to show criminal intent or furtherance of a scheme. This defense claims the lies were just empty boasts that did not defraud anyone.
Allegations of false statements in press releases, social media posts, or other public forums may be defended as free speech instead of fraud. The First Amendment protects exaggerated commercial speech that no reasonable person would rely on. This argues the communications were mere puffery, not criminal acts.
Federal wire fraud has a 5 year statute of limitations. The lawyer will scrutinize the timing of the alleged criminal acts. If the communications occurred more than 5 years before charges are filed, this defense can defeat the case entirely.
Offering substantial assistance to the government in investigating and prosecuting others or paying full restitution to victims may persuade prosecutors to drop charges. This shows acceptance of responsibility and mitigates the criminal conduct.
As you can see, defending complex federal wire fraud accusations requires an attorney well-versed in criminal law, defense strategies, and constitutional rights. Don’t go it alone against the formidable resources of the FBI and U.S. attorneys. Hire the best defense lawyer you can afford. Look for a seasoned litigator with specific experience defeating wire fraud cases in federal court. This gives you the best chance at preserving your freedom and protecting your future.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.