Spodek Law Group handles tough cases
nationwide, that demand excellence.
Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
When daunting federal crimes stand before prosecutors, they must often use whatever tools at their disposal to shed light on heinous criminal activities and bring the powerful perpetrators to justice. One such legal apparatus that has continued to play a potent role in granting justice is called immunity. Spodek Law Group, a New Jersey-based criminal defense firm, invites you to explore the world of immunity agreements in federal criminal cases.
Immunity is a legally-binding and powerful agreement in which an individual, who is either directly participating in some type of offense or possesses key information about the illicit behavior, cooperates with authorities. In exchange for this valuable testimony or information, the individual is provided with a formal assurance of receiving a markedly reduced punishment, or in select cases, no punishment at all for their involvement in the criminal acts.
While critics argue that immunity offers criminals a proverbial “get out of jail free” card, proponents emphasize the pivotal role such agreements play in uncovering major crimes and apprehending the alleged masterminds behind them. Furthermore, when offered the tantalizing opportunity to avoid overwhelming consequences, such as lengthy federal prison time, individuals tend to be far more cooperative with prosecutors than those who are not presented with such lucrative incentives.
There are three primary types of immunity commonly used in federal criminal cases: Proffer Letter Immunity, Letter Immunity, and Statutory Immunity.
Proffer Letter Immunity: As documented agreements forged between the federal government and the recipient, proffer letter arrangements allow an individual to disclose their extensive knowledge about a particular case or incident without being subjected to prosecution. Despite its appeal, legal experts assert that this is the weakest immunity contract one can be offered for a variety of significant reasons.
First, prosecutors are able to use any testimony offered by the recipient to amass additional incriminating evidence against them. Moreover, if the proffer letter beneficiary contradicts any evidence presented during the initial proceedings, they could face punitive legal consequences.
Letter Immunity: This tailor-made written agreement is negotiated between the federal government and the recipient, ensuring that federal authorities are prohibited from using any disclosed information against the testifier or gathering further evidence of wrongdoing. Letter immunity is widely considered a more robust form of protection than its Proffer counterpart.
Statutory Immunity: In rare cases, a federal judge may determine that a witness’s testimony is of paramount importance and mandate the individual to provide it in a legal proceeding. However, this specific court order stands in direct opposition to the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which safeguards individuals from self-incrimination. In such exceptional circumstances, the testimony offered cannot be used against the disclosing individual in any capacity.
Witnesses may request immunity in exchange for divulging crucial information, or prosecutors may offer an individual bearing valuable testimony an enticing immunity deal. To reach a final decision, prosecutors typically consider several influential factors such as the caliber of testimony the witness can provide, the severity of the witness’s involvement in the criminal activity, and the credibility of the individual testifying.
The intricate agreement is constructed through a formal written document, outlining the negotiated terms and other pertinent conditions, and is officially endorsed by a high-ranking government official. Once the draft is devised, it is presented to the intended recipient, who is then allocated a time frame within which to accept the enticing offer.
While some may perceive an immunity offer as an open and shut case, recipients must tread carefully and mull over several significant issues. These weighty factors include the prospect of betraying friends and associates, the daunting prospect of admitting their role in a major crime and the staggering impact of such a revelation, and the fear of retaliation from those who face incrimination as a result of the recipient’s statements.
The immunity process is a far more complex and intricate procedure than is often depicted in television crime dramas. Individuals who are presented with the overwhelming decision to accept or decline an immunity deal must carefully consider the multitude of factors at play and attempt to negotiate an arrangement best suited to their needs. Tackling this intricate process without the expertise of an experienced federal criminal attorney could lead to disastrous outcomes.
For those with inquiries about immunity, the federal criminal process, or any other legal concerns, we encourage you to visit www.njcriminalattorneys.com.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.