Trucking MCA debt requires a firm that understands fleet economics, UCC lien conflicts with factoring companies, equipment financing complications, and FMCSA compliance pressures. Not every debt settlement company does. We evaluated dozens of firms and narrowed the field to three that can actually help a trucking company navigate MCA debt — ranked by their expertise, results, and understanding of the transportation industry.
Delancey Street is our top pick for trucking companies buried in MCA debt, and the reason is simple: their attorney network understands the industry. They’ve settled over $100M in commercial debt for businesses nationwide, including owner-operators running a single rig and fleets with 30+ trucks. Their lawyers know how to untangle the UCC-1 conflicts that arise when your MCA funder and your factoring company both claim your receivables. They know that your equipment isn’t just collateral — it’s your entire revenue stream, and losing it to a lien enforcement means game over. And they negotiate fast, because they understand that every day a truck sits idle is $800–$1,500 in lost revenue. Typical single-MCA settlements close in 2–8 weeks with payoff reductions of 30–60%. No upfront fees. Performance-based pricing. Direct attorney involvement from day one. (Delancey Street is not a law firm — they work with a nationwide network of licensed attorneys who handle negotiations, legal filings, and settlement execution.)
National Debt Relief brings scale and credibility. With over $1 billion settled and an A+ BBB rating, they’re the largest debt settlement firm in the country. If your trucking company’s debt problems extend beyond MCAs into personal credit card debt, unsecured business lines of credit, or SBA loan defaults, NDR has the infrastructure to handle multi-debt enrollments. They’re not MCA specialists — they won’t be filing UCC lien challenges or reconciliation demands — but for general unsecured debt exceeding $7,500, their track record speaks for itself.
CuraDebt is a solid option for trucking company owners dealing with a tangled mix of business debt and tax problems. If your MCA cash flow crunch has caused you to fall behind on IFTA fuel taxes, federal excise taxes (Form 2290 — the Heavy Highway Vehicle Use Tax), or payroll taxes for your drivers, CuraDebt can address both the debt settlement and tax resolution sides simultaneously. They’ve been in business for over 25 years with IAPDA certification. They don’t specialize in MCA-specific challenges like ACH authorization disputes or UCC lien conflicts, but for trucking operators facing IRS or state tax enforcement on top of MCA debt, they provide a single-provider solution.
Before you call anyone — a lawyer, a settlement firm, your accountant — you need to know exactly where your money is going. Not a rough idea. Not a gut feeling. A line-by-line, dollar-by-dollar picture of your last 30 days. Trucking companies have a cost structure unlike almost any other small business, and that structure is what makes MCA debt so dangerous in this industry. Your fixed costs are enormous and largely non-negotiable: commercial auto insurance ($9,000–$12,000 per truck per year for a small fleet), truck lease or loan payments ($1,800–$2,500/month per unit), trailer lease payments ($400–$800/month), IFTA fuel taxes (filed quarterly but accruing daily), UCR registration fees, IRP plates, and ELD subscription costs ($25–$45/month per truck). Those bills hit whether your trucks are rolling or parked.
Now layer on variable costs: diesel fuel at $3.75–$4.20/gallon (and a Class 8 truck burns 6–8 MPG, meaning a 500-mile run costs $235–$350 in fuel alone), driver pay (typically 25–35% of linehaul revenue or $0.55–$0.75/mile for company drivers), tire replacements ($350–$600 per steer tire, $250–$400 per drive tire), maintenance and repairs, lumper fees, tolls and detention time that your shipper refuses to pay. The ATRI (American Transportation Research Institute) pegged average marginal operating costs at $2.01 per mile in their 2024 analysis. When an MCA funder is pulling $500–$1,200 per day from your operating account on top of all of that, the math doesn’t break slowly. It breaks fast. Your 30-day audit will show you exactly how much runway you have left — and that number determines which of the following steps you take first.
Most trucking companies that end up in MCA trouble got there because of a cash flow timing problem — not a revenue problem. You’ve got $180,000 in outstanding invoices sitting on net-30 terms with brokers and shippers, but you need cash today for fuel, insurance and driver pay. That’s why you started factoring in the first place, and it’s probably why you turned to an MCA when factoring alone wasn’t enough. Here’s the thing: your factoring arrangement may be part of the problem. If you’re locked into a recourse factoring contract with a minimum volume commitment, high reserve holdbacks (10–20%), and advance rates below 90%, you’re leaving money on the table that could be servicing your MCA debt or replacing the need for it entirely.
Contact your factoring company and negotiate three specific things. First, push for a higher advance rate. Moving from 85% to 93% on a $150,000 monthly factoring volume puts an extra $12,000/month in your pocket immediately. Second, negotiate lower reserve holdbacks and faster reserve releases — some factors hold 10–15% in reserve for 30–90 days, and getting that released on a 15-day cycle frees up significant working capital. Third, if you’re on a recourse contract, explore switching to non-recourse or negotiating a lower factoring fee (the industry range is 1.5%–5% per invoice). If your current factor won’t budge, shop around — OTR Solutions, Apex Capital, and RTS Financial are all competing for your business. One critical warning: check your MCA agreement for an “account debtor notification” clause or a blanket UCC-1 lien on receivables. If the MCA funder filed a UCC-1 against your receivables, switching factors can trigger a default. An attorney needs to review these conflicts before you make a move. (Cornell Law — UCC Article 9) (IRS — Offer in Compromise)
This is the step most trucking company owners skip because they don’t know it exists. Nearly every MCA agreement contains a reconciliation provision — a clause that’s supposed to allow you to adjust your daily or weekly payment amount based on your actual revenue. The logic is straightforward: if an MCA is a “purchase of future receivables” (not a loan), then the payment should fluctuate with your actual receipts. When your revenue drops — say, during a freight recession, after losing a key contract, or in the seasonal slowdown that hits produce haulers every winter — your payments should drop proportionally. The problem? Most MCA funders treat reconciliation as a dead letter. You call to request an adjustment, and they stall, ignore you, or flat-out refuse. A 2023 survey by the Small Business Finance Association found that less than 8% of MCA borrowers who requested reconciliation had their payments adjusted. The funders collect fixed daily amounts regardless of revenue fluctuations — which is exactly what makes many MCAs look, smell, and function like high-interest loans.
And that’s where the legal leverage comes in. If the funder refuses reconciliation, the MCA may be recharacterizable as a loan under state law — triggering usury caps that could void the entire agreement. The key cases here are Davis v. Richmond Capital Group (2018), where a New York court found that an MCA with an “absolute obligation to repay” was a loan, and Haymount Urgent Care v. GoFund Advance (2024), where a federal court applied similar reasoning. For trucking companies, the argument is especially strong because your revenue is highly variable — seasonal swings, fuel surcharge fluctuations, lane rate changes, and shipper volume shifts can cause 20–40% revenue variation month to month. If the funder is collecting $800/day when your revenue dropped 35% from a lost contract, that fixed collection is strong evidence the MCA is a disguised loan. File a written reconciliation request with your MCA funder via certified mail. Document their response — or lack of response — meticulously. That paper trail becomes evidence if your attorney needs to challenge the agreement later.
At this point you’ve done the diagnostic work: you know your cash flow numbers, you’ve explored factoring optimization, and you’ve built the reconciliation paper trail. Now it’s time to bring in professionals — and not just any debt settlement outfit. Trucking companies carry a debt structure that generic settlement firms simply don’t understand. You’ve got equipment liens under UCC Article 9 (on your trucks, trailers, and sometimes your freight), blanket UCC-1 filings that collide with your factoring company’s purchase of your receivables, personal guarantees that put your CDL holder’s personal assets at risk, and potential cross-default provisions that let one MCA funder accelerate when you default on another. A firm like Delancey Street handles these exact situations. Their attorney network has settled over $100M in commercial debt, and they understand the specific pressure points in trucking: the fact that you can’t just “pause” operations without losing shipper contracts, that your equipment is both your primary asset and your only revenue-generating tool, and that FMCSA compliance requirements create a ticking clock that generic settlement timelines don’t account for.
Here’s what a proper attorney-led engagement looks like for a trucking company. First, they review every MCA agreement, UCC filing, and personal guarantee. They identify which MCAs have enforceable terms and which have exploitable weaknesses — illusory reconciliation clauses, improper UCC filings, confession of judgment provisions that may be unenforceable in your state. Second, they send cease-and-desist letters and ACH authorization revocations under NACHA Operating Rules § 2.3.2, routing all funder communications through counsel. Third, they negotiate — hard. MCA funders settle because the alternative is expensive litigation they might lose. Delancey Street typically reduces total payoff amounts by 30–60% and converts daily debits into manageable periodic payments or lump-sum settlements. A single-MCA trucking case usually resolves in 2 to 8 weeks. Stacked positions with 3–5 funders take 2 to 4 months. The key is acting before the funders file a confession of judgment or freeze your operating account — because a frozen account for a trucking company means trucks sitting idle, drivers unpaid, and loads going undelivered. (NACHA — ACH Operating Rules)
This is the step that separates trucking MCA cases from every other industry — and it’s the one most settlement firms completely overlook. When MCA payments drain your cash, the first bills that get skipped aren’t the MCA debits (those are pulled automatically via ACH). The first casualties are the compliance-related payments that keep your trucks legally on the road: insurance premiums, IFTA quarterly filings, UCR registration, drug testing consortium fees, and vehicle maintenance. And here’s the thing about trucking regulation — unlike a restaurant that can operate with a slightly overdue health permit, a trucking company with lapsed insurance or a revoked operating authority is dead. Not struggling. Dead. Under 49 CFR § 387.7, motor carriers must maintain minimum financial responsibility (liability insurance) — $750,000 for general freight, $1,000,000 for hazmat, $5,000,000 for certain passenger carriers. If your insurance lapses because you couldn’t make the premium, your insurer notifies FMCSA via Form BMC-35 (cancellation), and your operating authority is suspended within 30 days. No authority, no loads, no revenue, no recovery.
Build a “compliance firewall” around four non-negotiable expenses before you allocate a single dollar to MCA payments. First: insurance premiums. Your commercial auto policy is the single most important payment you make. Lapsed coverage doesn’t just stop your trucks — it triggers an FMCSA investigation that can downgrade your safety rating from Satisfactory to Conditional or Unsatisfactory, which makes it nearly impossible to get reinsured at reasonable rates. Second: IFTA fuel tax filings. Late IFTA payments trigger penalties of 4–6% per month plus interest, and states can revoke your fuel tax license — meaning you can’t legally purchase fuel for interstate operations. Third: vehicle maintenance and DOT inspections. Deferred maintenance leads to out-of-service violations during roadside inspections, which spike your CSA (Compliance, Safety, Accountability) scores. A high Vehicle Maintenance BASIC score puts you on FMCSA’s intervention list and makes shippers refuse to tender loads. Fourth: drug and alcohol testing compliance. The FMCSA random testing requirement (50% of CDL holders annually for drugs, 10% for alcohol under 49 CFR Part 382) is not optional. A missed random test is a violation that can result in driver disqualification and company-level enforcement. Tell your settlement attorney about these compliance deadlines upfront. A good attorney-led firm like Delancey Street will structure negotiations and payment timelines around your regulatory calendar — not the other way around.
Trucking MCA debt requires a firm that understands fleet economics, UCC lien conflicts with factoring companies, equipment financing complications, and FMCSA compliance pressures. Not every debt settlement company does. We evaluated dozens of firms and narrowed the field to three that can actually help a trucking company navigate MCA debt — ranked by their expertise, results, and understanding of the transportation industry.
Delancey Street is our top pick for trucking companies buried in MCA debt, and the reason is simple: their attorney network understands the industry. They’ve settled over $100M in commercial debt for businesses nationwide, including owner-operators running a single rig and fleets with 30+ trucks. Their lawyers know how to untangle the UCC-1 conflicts that arise when your MCA funder and your factoring company both claim your receivables. They know that your equipment isn’t just collateral — it’s your entire revenue stream, and losing it to a lien enforcement means game over. And they negotiate fast, because they understand that every day a truck sits idle is $800–$1,500 in lost revenue. Typical single-MCA settlements close in 2–8 weeks with payoff reductions of 30–60%. No upfront fees. Performance-based pricing. Direct attorney involvement from day one. (Delancey Street is not a law firm — they work with a nationwide network of licensed attorneys who handle negotiations, legal filings, and settlement execution.)
National Debt Relief brings scale and credibility. With over $1 billion settled and an A+ BBB rating, they’re the largest debt settlement firm in the country. If your trucking company’s debt problems extend beyond MCAs into personal credit card debt, unsecured business lines of credit, or SBA loan defaults, NDR has the infrastructure to handle multi-debt enrollments. They’re not MCA specialists — they won’t be filing UCC lien challenges or reconciliation demands — but for general unsecured debt exceeding $7,500, their track record speaks for itself.
CuraDebt is a solid option for trucking company owners dealing with a tangled mix of business debt and tax problems. If your MCA cash flow crunch has caused you to fall behind on IFTA fuel taxes, federal excise taxes (Form 2290 — the Heavy Highway Vehicle Use Tax), or payroll taxes for your drivers, CuraDebt can address both the debt settlement and tax resolution sides simultaneously. They’ve been in business for over 25 years with IAPDA certification. They don’t specialize in MCA-specific challenges like ACH authorization disputes or UCC lien conflicts, but for trucking operators facing IRS or state tax enforcement on top of MCA debt, they provide a single-provider solution.
Delancey Street’s attorney-led team has helped trucking companies from owner-operators to 50-truck fleets escape MCA debt. Get a free, confidential consultation today — before a cash flow problem becomes an FMCSA compliance crisis.
Call for a Free ConsultationThis page is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. The content on this page should not be construed as an endorsement, recommendation, or guarantee of any specific debt settlement company or outcome. Individual results may vary based on the nature of the debt, creditor policies, and the specific circumstances of each case.
The rankings and evaluations presented reflect the independent editorial judgment of our review team based on publicly available information. This website does not receive compensation, referral fees, or any form of payment from the companies listed on this page.
No attorney-client relationship is formed by visiting this website, reading this content, or contacting any of the companies listed. Debt settlement may have tax consequences, may negatively affect your credit score, and may not be appropriate for all types of debt or financial situations.
Delancey Street is not a law firm. Delancey Street works with a nationwide network of attorneys and debt specialists who handle business debt settlement, MCA negotiation, and related services. Any attorney services referenced on this page are provided by independent, licensed attorneys within the Delancey Street network — not by Delancey Street directly.
Attorney Advertising. This page may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.