Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 20th October 2023, 09:33 am
In the United States legal system, the burden of proof refers to the obligation of a party in a trial to produce sufficient evidence to support their claim. This is a fundamental principle that ensures fairness by preventing baseless accusations from being accepted as fact without adequate proof.
The burden of proof generally rests with the prosecution in criminal cases. This means that prosecutors have to prove “beyond a reasonable doubt” that the defendant committed the crime they are charged with. Here is an overview of key aspects of the burden of proof in federal criminal cases:
“Beyond a reasonable doubt” is the highest standard of proof used in U.S. criminal cases. What exactly constitutes reasonable doubt is not precisely defined under the law, but it is understood to mean that no other logical explanation can be derived from the facts except that the defendant committed the crime.
Reasonable doubt does not mean all doubt must be eliminated. But it does require that the evidence be so conclusive that it leaves no reasonable doubt in the mind of a rational person that the defendant is guilty. This high standard reflects the severity of criminal penalties like loss of liberty or life.
To meet their burden of proof, prosecutors must first meet the “burden of production.” This means providing enough evidence for each element of the charged crime so that a judge or jury could reasonably find the defendant guilty based on the evidence presented. If the prosecution fails to meet this initial burden of production, the case can be dismissed without needing to reach the reasonable doubt question.
Jurors are typically given instructions explaining the reasonable doubt standard before they begin deliberations in a criminal trial. There are some different approved formulations of these instructions at the federal level:
While these instructions provide guidance, the law discourages prosecutors, defense lawyers, and judges from offering their own specific definitions of reasonable doubt. How reasonable doubt is applied is ultimately up to each juror.
Prosecutors bear the burden of proving all elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt. But if defendants assert an affirmative defense such as insanity, self-defense, or entrapment, they take on the burden of proving that defense applies. However, defendants only need to establish an affirmative defense by a “preponderance of evidence” rather than the higher reasonable doubt standard.
If a party in a criminal case believes the jury was given improper instructions on reasonable doubt or the burden of proof, they must object right away to preserve the issue for appeal. Without a prompt objection, a higher court may decline to review instructions even if they were erroneous.
The burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt is a high bar for prosecutors. If the prosecution fails to meet this burden, the jury should find the defendant not guilty. The Double Jeopardy Clause prevents the government from prosecuting a defendant twice for the same crime following an acquittal.
While the reasonable doubt standard applies in criminal prosecutions, a lower “preponderance of the evidence” standard typically applies in civil cases. This means that the plaintiff/prosecution only needs to show it is more likely than not that the defendant violated their rights or breached a duty owed.
The high reasonable doubt standard used in criminal cases reflects the severe penalties defendants face. Since incarceration and loss of life or liberty are not at stake in civil cases, a lower standard of proof is used. However, higher standards like “clear and convincing evidence” may apply in certain civil cases as well.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.