Service & Results.

nyc criminal lawyers over 30 years of experienceWe Know How To Win Cases

Spodek Law Group handles tough cases
nationwide, that demand excellence.

Get Free Consultation

Faced 5+ Years in Prison

People Vs Joseph Amico

Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.

Faced 10+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Anna Sorokin

Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.

Faced 3+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Genevieve Sabourin

Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.

Faced Potential Charges

Ghislaine Maxwell Juror

Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.

Why Choose Us

Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.

Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.

We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.

Law in the Media

View All

Meet Todd Spodek


The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.

Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.

In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.

Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group

The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.

We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.

If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.

What Is Safety Valve In Federal Criminal Cases


What Is Safety Valve In Federal Criminal Cases?

A safety valve is an exception to mandatory minimum sentencing laws in federal criminal cases. It allows a judge to sentence a defendant below the mandatory minimum term if certain conditions are met. Safety valves provide important relief for low-level, nonviolent offenders who would otherwise face disproportionately harsh mandatory minimum sentences.

How Safety Valves Work

Mandatory minimum sentences set a minimum prison term that must be imposed for certain federal crimes. Judges have no discretion to go below this mandatory floor, even if they feel the sentence is too severe for a particular defendant.

Safety valves create a narrow exception to mandatory minimums. They allow judges to disregard the mandatory minimum and impose a more appropriate sentence, if the defendant meets certain criteria. While safety valves do not eliminate mandatory minimums entirely, they provide a “release valve” in cases where the mandatory sentence would be unjust.

The main effect of qualifying for a safety valve is the judge can go below the mandatory minimum when determining the sentence. This allows the judge to tailor the sentence based on the individual circumstances of the case, rather than being bound by a “one-size-fits-all” mandatory term set by statute.

In addition to relief from the mandatory minimum, defendants who qualify for a safety valve also receive a 2-level reduction in their offense level under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. This further reduces the sentencing range calculated under the Guidelines, beyond just the relief from the statutory mandatory minimum.

History and Purpose of Safety Valves

Congress created federal mandatory minimum sentences during the “War on Drugs” in the 1980s and 1990s. Their original purpose was to punish high-level drug traffickers and kingpins. But in practice, mandatory minimums often resulted in low-level offenders receiving harsh sentences that were disproportionate to their conduct.

Safety valves were introduced to help remedy this problem. They provide an exception for less culpable offenders who otherwise would get excessive mandatory minimum sentences.

The first federal safety valve was enacted in 1994. It originally applied quite narrowly, only benefitting first-time, nonviolent drug offenders who provided full cooperation to the Government.

Over time, Congress has recognized the importance of expanding safety valves to cover more defendants. Recent reforms have focused on broadening safety valves to reduce over-incarceration of lower-level drug offenders.

For example, the First Step Act of 2018 expanded the federal safety valve by allowing defendants with slightly longer criminal histories to qualify. This change opened up the safety valve to more low-level drug offenders.

Benefits of Safety Valves

Safety valves provide several important benefits:

  • They help reduce excessive punishment of low-level, nonviolent drug offenders who would otherwise face lengthy mandatory minimums.
  • They allow individualized sentencing based on a defendant’s role and culpability, rather than rigid mandatory penalties.
  • They save taxpayer dollars by allowing shorter sentences for defendants who do not pose major safety risks. Prisons are extremely costly.
  • They encourage cooperation by defendants who want to qualify for the safety valve. Cooperation helps law enforcement investigate and prosecute more serious offenders higher up in the drug enterprise.
  • They reduce sentencing disparities and inconsistencies caused by mandatory minimums. Safety valves let judges sentence similar defendants similarly, regardless of the charges brought.
  • They increase transparency and accountability by requiring judges to explain on the record why the mandatory minimum is unnecessary for a particular defendant.

Overall, safety valves help restore balance, proportionality, and fairness to federal drug sentencing. They provide a release valve for injustice caused by inflexible mandatory minimum statutes.

How Defendants Qualify for the Safety Valve

To receive safety valve relief, the defendant bears the burden of proving they have satisfied all five eligibility criteria listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f).

The criteria are applied strictly. Failure to meet even one prong will disqualify the defendant from safety valve relief. Let’s look closer at what each requirement entails:

1. Minimal Criminal History

The defendant must have no more than 4 criminal history points under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Certain minor convictions do not count at all:

  • 1-point misdemeanor offenses
  • Juvenile offenses
  • Expunged or invalidated convictions
  • Certain tribal court convictions

The 4-point threshold was increased from 1 point by the First Step Act of 2018. This expanded the safety valve to defendants with slightly more criminal history.

2. No Violence or Dangerous Weapons

The offense must be nonviolent with no possession of dangerous weapons. This includes both the defendant’s own conduct and anyone else they “aided and abetted.”

Mere presence of a firearm that is unrelated to the offense will not necessarily disqualify the defendant. However, active use or possession of a firearm in connection with drug trafficking will preclude safety valve eligibility.

3. No Death or Serious Bodily Injury

If the offense resulted in death or serious injury to any person, the safety valve is unavailable. Serious bodily injury means things like permanent or life-threatening injury, loss of limb, disfigurement, or coma.

4. Not an Organizer or Leader

The defendant cannot have played an aggravating role as an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor of others in the criminal activity. This determination is based on sentencing enhancements for aggravating role under the Guidelines.

If the defendant exercised any degree of control or organizational authority over others involved in the offense, they cannot qualify for the safety valve. But having a mere buyer/seller relationship with others does not preclude eligibility.

5. Complete Cooperation with the Government

By the time of sentencing, the defendant must have truthfully provided the Government with all evidence and information about the offense and relevant conduct. This cooperation is often provided through a “safety valve proffer” with prosecutors.

The defendant must disclose everything they know about both their own involvement and anyone else’s participation in the criminal activity. Omissions or lying will disqualify the defendant from safety valve relief.

How Judges Apply the Safety Valve

If the defendant establishes they have met all five safety valve criteria, the judge is permitted – but not required – to impose a sentence below the statutory mandatory minimum.

In making this determination, the judge must consider the sentencing factors laid out in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). These include things like the defendant’s history and characteristics, the nature of the offense, the need to promote respect for the law and provide just punishment, and the kinds of sentences available.

If the judge concludes a sentence below the mandatory minimum would be sufficient to serve these purposes, they can disregard the mandatory minimum and impose a lower sentence within the Guidelines range.

However, the judge is never required to impose a below-minimum sentence, even if the safety valve applies. The safety valve simply gives the judge discretion to deviate below the mandatory minimum if appropriate based on the § 3553(a) factors.

If the judge does impose a below-minimum sentence, they must explain their reasons on the record. This promotes transparency and allows appellate review of whether the safety valve was applied appropriately.

In addition to relief from the mandatory minimum, the judge must also reduce the defendant’s offense level by 2 levels under the Guidelines if the safety valve applies. So the safety valve provides a double benefit – relief from the mandatory minimum, plus a lower Guidelines range.

What Types of Cases Are Eligible for Safety Valves?

The federal safety valve statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f), lists the specific offenses that are eligible:

  • Federal drug trafficking crimes under 21 U.S.C. § 841, § 844, § 846, § 960, and § 963. This includes charges for manufacture, distribution, dispensation, and possession with intent to distribute controlled substances.
  • Simple possession under 21 U.S.C. § 844.
  • Attempts and conspiracies under 21 U.S.C. § 846 and § 963.
  • Maritime drug trafficking under 46 U.S.C. § 70503 and § 70506.

So the safety valve only applies to certain drug offenses carrying mandatory minimum sentences. Other types of federal crimes with mandatory minimums, such as child pornography, crimes of violence, or firearms offenses, are not eligible.

Free Consultation


I was searching for a law firm with some power to help me deal with a warrant in New York . After 6 days I decided to go with Spodek Law Group. It helped that This law firm is well respected by not only the top law firms in New York , but the DA , Judge as well. I...

~Fonder Brandon

5 Stars
It was my good fortune to retain Spodek Law Group for representation for my legal needs. From the beginning, communication was prompt and thorough. Todd, Kenneth and Alex were the first people I worked with and they all made me, and my company Qumana skincare feel comfortable and confident that the team was going to work hard for me. Everything...

~A G

5 Stars
After meeting with several law firms, I chose the Spodek Law Group not only for their professionalism and experience, but for the personal attention given to me right from the initial consultation. It is important to recognize how crucial having the right legal team is when faced with potentially life altering events that impact families and the lives of loved...

~George Cherubini

Spodek Law Group

White Glove Service

We Provide Superior Service, Excellent Results, At A Level Superior To Other Criminal Defense Law Firms. Regardless Of Where Your Case Is, Nationwide, We Can Help You.
View More

Request Free Consultation

Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.


85 Broad St 30th Floor, New York, NY 10004


get directions

Los Angeles

611 S Catalina St Suite 222, Los Angeles, CA 90005


get directions


35-37 36th St, 2nd Floor Astoria, NY 11106


get directions


195 Montague St., 14th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201


get directions
Call Now!