Service & Results.

nyc criminal lawyers over 30 years of experienceWe Know How To Win Cases

Spodek Law Group handles tough cases
nationwide, that demand excellence.

Get Free Consultation

Faced 5+ Years in Prison

People Vs Joseph Amico

Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.

Faced 10+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Anna Sorokin

Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.

Faced 3+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Genevieve Sabourin

Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.

Faced Potential Charges

Ghislaine Maxwell Juror

Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.

Why Choose Us

Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.

Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.

We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.

Law in the Media

View All

Meet Todd Spodek


The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.

Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.

In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.

Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group

The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.

We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.

If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.

What Factors Determine Your Sentence for a Federal Crime Conviction?

By Spodek Law Group | October 19, 2023
(Last Updated On: October 20, 2023)

Last Updated on: 20th October 2023, 01:56 pm

What Factors Determine Your Sentence for a Federal Crime Conviction?

Being convicted of a federal crime can lead to serious consequences, including long prison sentences. Unlike state courts which may have wider discretion in sentencing, federal courts follow the Federal Sentencing Guidelines which provide calculated ranges based on the crime committed and the defendant’s criminal history. However, judges still consider multiple factors and have some flexibility in determining the final sentence. This article will examine the key factors that impact sentencing for federal convictions.

The Federal Sentencing Guidelines

The Federal Sentencing Guidelines were created by the United States Sentencing Commission to promote consistency and fairness in federal sentencing across the country. The guidelines provide a calculated sentencing range based on:

  • The seriousness of the offense
  • The defendant’s criminal history

To determine the seriousness of the offense, each federal crime is assigned a base offense level which is the starting point. More serious crimes have higher base levels – for example, trespassing has a level of 4 while kidnapping has a level of 32.

Then, the judge considers specific offense characteristics which can increase or decrease the base level. These include factors like:

  • Amount of financial loss in fraud cases
  • Vulnerability of the victim
  • Defendant’s role as a leader/organizer
  • Obstruction of justice

After adjusting for any characteristics, there may be additional adjustments for:

  • Multiple counts of conviction
  • Acceptance of responsibility

The adjusted offense level is then combined with the defendant’s criminal history category to find the final guideline range. More extensive criminal history leads to higher categories and longer sentences.

While judges must consider the calculated range, they have discretion to sentence above or below the guidelines. This Supreme Court decision made the guidelines advisory rather than mandatory.

Factors Judges Consider in Sentencing

Although the sentencing guidelines provide a starting point, federal judges can make adjustments based on the facts of the case. Some of the key factors considered are:

Circumstances of the Offense

  • The specific crime committed
  • How the crime was carried out
  • The defendant’s role and level of participation
  • Forethought and planning involved
  • Motivation or reason for committing the crime
  • Actual or potential harm caused

Aggravating factors like significant damage or harm caused will increase the sentence, while mitigating factors will decrease it.

Characteristics of the Defendant

  • Criminal history including past convictions
  • History of violence or lack thereof
  • Drug, alcohol, or gambling addictions
  • Mental health issues
  • Age and maturity level
  • Family obligations
  • Employment history
  • Socioeconomic background
  • Education level
  • Immigration status
  • Community ties
  • Remorse and acceptance of responsibility

The defendant’s background and personal circumstances may persuade the judge to be more lenient. First-time offenders generally receive lighter sentences.

Victim Impact

The judge will consider how the victim was affected emotionally, physically, and financially. Crimes with severely impacted victims often warrant longer sentences. Victim impact statements are usually submitted to convey this.

Need for Rehabilitation

If the judge believes the defendant will benefit from treatment programs like anger management or drug counseling, a shorter prison sentence may be given along with requirements to complete such programs.

Public Safety

The need to protect the public from future crimes by the defendant is considered. Defendants deemed a high risk for reoffending may get longer sentences.


Longer sentences may be given for certain crimes to deter others from committing them. The goal is for the punishment to outweigh the benefit of the criminal conduct.


Sentences for federal crimes should be relatively consistent across the country. Judges consider average sentences given for similar offenses so as not to deviate too far from the norm.

Mandatory Minimums

Some federal crimes like drug trafficking carry mandatory minimum sentences that limit a judge’s discretion. Safety valves allow less culpable defendants to get lower sentences.

Departures from the Guidelines

In some cases, judges may depart from the calculated guideline range by sentencing above or below it. Upward departures are less common than downward departures. Reasons for departure include:

  • Circumstances not considered in guidelines
  • Overstated or understated criminal history
  • High likelihood of recidivism
  • Unusually cruel conduct
  • Significant victim impact
  • Substantial assistance to authorities
  • Age, health, family obligations
  • Voluntary rehabilitation efforts

Departures must be explained by the judge and are subject to appeal. But appeals courts give deference to judges’ discretion.

How Judges Reach Their Sentencing Decisions

Crafting an appropriate sentence is a nuanced process that considers multiple competing factors. Here are some insights into a judge’s thought process:

  • They start with the guidelines range as a benchmark but do not rigidly adhere to it.
  • The circumstances of the crime and its severity tend to have an outsized influence. Aggravating factors increase sentences.
  • They try to avoid unwarranted disparities between similar defendants. But some disparity is inevitable given judges’ discretion.
  • Most seek to impose the minimum sentence needed to achieve the purposes of punishment, deterrence, and public safety.
  • They consider proportionality – the sentence should match the crime.
  • Personal characteristics of the defendant hold some sway if compelling. Remorse and cooperation are viewed favorably.
  • Victim impact statements humanize the harm caused and can influence judges emotionally.
  • Policy considerations like prison overcrowding occasionally factor in.
  • Sentencing one defendant more harshly to “set an example” is frowned upon.
  • They explain the rationale for sentences that substantially depart from the guidelines.

While crafting sentences involves subjective weighing of factors, judges aim to balance different interests and follow a consistent, reasoned approach based on the facts.



Free Consultation


I was searching for a law firm with some power to help me deal with a warrant in New York . After 6 days I decided to go with Spodek Law Group. It helped that This law firm is well respected by not only the top law firms in New York , but the DA , Judge as well. I...

~Fonder Brandon

5 Stars
It was my good fortune to retain Spodek Law Group for representation for my legal needs. From the beginning, communication was prompt and thorough. Todd, Kenneth and Alex were the first people I worked with and they all made me feel comfortable and confident that the team was going to work hard for me. Everything was explained and any concerns...

~A G

5 Stars
After meeting with several law firms, I chose the Spodek Law Group not only for their professionalism and experience, but for the personal attention given to me right from the initial consultation. It is important to recognize how crucial having the right legal team is when faced with potentially life altering events that impact families and the lives of loved...

~George Cherubini

Spodek Law Group

White Glove Service

We Provide Superior Service, Excellent Results, At A Level Superior To Other Criminal Defense Law Firms. Regardless Of Where Your Case Is, Nationwide, We Can Help You.
View More

Request Free Consultation

Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.


85 Broad St 30th Floor, New York, NY 10004


get directions

Los Angeles

611 S Catalina St Suite 222, Los Angeles, CA 90005


get directions


35-37 36th St, 2nd Floor Astoria, NY 11106


get directions


195 Montague St., 14th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201


get directions
Call Now!