Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 28th July 2023, 07:22 pm
Safety Net Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits are financial assistance provided by the United States federal government to low-income citizens to purchase groceries and food items. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) is responsible for administering SNAP benefits and monitoring retailers approved to accept these benefits. Receiving a violation notice from the USDA because of suspected SNAP violations can be distressing and challenging for store owners, especially if they lack comprehension of the notice’s meaning and necessity. This guide aims to provide an overview of the topic, covering the kinds of violations, the USDA’s investigative process, and potential steps to respond to a violation notice.
SNAP, formerly known as the Food Stamps Program, is a nutrition assistance program for those who qualify based on financial criteria. The USDA manages this federal assistance program, and authorized retailers distribute the SNAP benefits. With EBT (Electronic Benefits Transfer) cards, households can purchase eligible foodstuffs, which aid in covering grocery expenses and keeping the cost of living manageable.
SNAP benefits are essential to families in need, but the program also requires strict compliance and oversight to prevent fraud and abuse. USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) ensures retailers follow program guidelines through regulations, monitoring, and enforcement.
When store owners become authorized SNAP retailers, they agree to adhere to specific rules and regulations while participating in the program. If an owner is suspected of violating these rules, they may be subject to investigation and potentially punishable. Violations range from minor infractions, such as incorrectly filling out paperwork, to severe offenses, such as trafficking in SNAP benefits (accepting benefits as payment for ineligible items or as cash).
There are four primary types of SNAP violations for retailers, including:
1. Trafficking: The illegal exchange of SNAP benefits for cash or non-food items.
2. Unauthorized Items: Accepting SNAP benefits as payment for ineligible purchases, such as alcohol, tobacco, or hot and prepared foods.
3. Application Fraud: Providing false information on the store’s application to become an authorized SNAP retailer or failing to report significant changes in the store’s ownership or operations.
4. Improper Redemption Practices: Extended patterns of transactions appearing irregular, like a high volume of transactions close together that suggest customers receive cash back from their benefits.
If found guilty of a SNAP violation, the store owner may face civil money penalties (CMPs). CMPs are monetary fines imposed by the USDA, in which the amount depends on the severity of the violation. Should the owner choose to pay CMPs instead of facing permanent disqualification from the SNAP program, they must adhere to the USDA’s rules and regulations closely moving forward.
In certain cases, such as if a retailer’s food stocks do not fulfill the SNAP eligibility requirements, they may also be subject to administrative fines and sanctions.
The USDA takes the investigative process seriously to protect the integrity of the SNAP program. The FNS will typically use undercover investigators and electronic transaction data analysis to determine whether a retailer committed a violation. Additionally, the FNS may contact store employees or customers to gather more information about suspected violations.
The FNS may issue warning letters or notices if it suspects a store has committed violations. If the evidence points to significant violations, the USDA may permanently disqualify the store from participating in SNAP or impose CMPs.
Retailers will typically receive a warning letter or a notice of violation depending on the severity of the situation. Warning letters will first be sent to stores in which a minor or nonexistent violation occurred. It serves as a cautionary reminder for the retailer to pay closer attention to the rules and regulations surrounding SNAP.
On the other hand, a notice of violation is more severe. If the USDA suspects a store of committing substantive violations, they will send a violation notice stating the alleged violation and potential penalties, such as disqualification from SNAP or assessment of CMPs.
Upon receiving a violation notice, store owners have the right to contest the allegations and request an administrative review, typically within ten days of receiving the notice. The store owner should submit their response in writing, presenting any evidence or arguments that support their innocence. Alternatively, they can request their attorneys to represent their interests in the process.
When contesting a violation notice, consider the following steps:
1. Review the violation notice and associated records or evidence thoroughly.
2. Gather documentation, such as receipts, invoices, sales records, and inventory records, to refute the alleged violation.
3. Consider consulting with a lawyer to obtain further legal advice and assistance.
4. Prepare and submit a written response to the violation notice, including evidence and a detailed explanation of the store’s position.
5. Maintain ongoing communication with the FNS during the review process, providing any additional information or documentation as requested.
If unsuccessful in the initial USDA administrative review, store owners have the right to appeal the decision to a USDA administrative law judge (ALJ) or directly to federal court.
There are various legal defenses that store owners may argue when contesting SNAP violations, such as:
1. Insufficient evidence: If the USDA cannot prove that the store owner committed a violation, the case may be dismissed.
2. Clerical or administrative errors: Errors made by store employees or the USDA may be responsible for the alleged violation.
3. Lack of intent: Proving that the store owner unintentionally participated in a SNAP violation might lead to reduced penalties.
4. Compliance programs: Demonstrating that the store owner implemented a compliance program to prevent SNAP violations can support their case.
Hiring an experienced attorney is crucial if a store owner is facing serious SNAP violations. An attorney can help ensure that the owner understands the allegations, provides an adequate response, and protects their interests. Legal representation is particularly important when:
1. Analyzing the evidence and violation notice.
2. Advising the store owner on their rights and obligations.
3. Assisting with the preparation of a response or appeal.
4. Advocating for the store owner in the administrative review process or in court.
5. Negotiating lower penalties if a violation is found.
By retaining an experienced attorney, store owners have a better chance of contesting the allegations and resolving the matter more favorably.
Receiving a USDA SNAP violation notice can be daunting for store owners. Understanding the various violations, the penalties they may face, and the response process is essential. It is crucial that store owners act promptly, gather evidence in their defense, and consider consulting or hiring an attorney experienced in SNAP violations. An appropriate response can potentially minimize the consequences or even dismiss the allegations, allowing the store owner to continue participating in the SNAP program and maintaining their business’s reputation.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.