Guarantee called in Pennsylvania? The statutory list is thin, but two protections here are among the strongest anywhere. Call Now - Free Consultation

8 Pennsylvania Exemptions That Protect You From a Personal Guarantee

Bottom line: Pennsylvania’s statutory exemptions are among the weakest in the country, and being honest about that is more useful than a longer list. There is no state homestead exemption, and the general monetary exemption in 42 Pa. C.S. §8123(a) is $300. What actually protects a guarantor here is: (1) that $300 floor, (2) the absence of any homestead, which pushes you toward bankruptcy, (3) the wage bar in 42 Pa. C.S. §8127, (4) tenancy by the entireties, (5) retirement funds under §8124(b), (6) insurance and annuity value under §8124(c), (7) uncapped public benefits, and (8) electing the federal list, where 11 U.S.C. §522(d)(1) protects $31,575. Call (888) 559-0156.

Start With the Bad News, Because It Changes the Plan

Pennsylvania does not have a homestead exemption. Not a small one, not a county-tiered one, not one buried in an obscure title. Florida protects a residence with no dollar ceiling at all and Texas protects acreage rather than value, while Pennsylvania protects three hundred dollars of anything you own and stops there. Guarantors who have read about homestead protection somewhere else and assumed it applies here are working from a false premise, and it is better to correct that in the first paragraph than in the third month.

Two things do the real work in this state, and neither of them is on a list of exemption amounts. The first is 42 Pa. C.S. §8127, which keeps wages, salaries and commissions out of reach while the employer holds them, with a short and closed list of exceptions that does not include a commercial guarantee. The second is tenancy by the entireties, which puts a jointly held marital residence beyond a creditor of only one spouse. Together those two cover the two assets most guarantors are actually worried about, and neither carries a dollar cap.

The eight items below run from the thin statutory floor to the federal election that supplies the homestead Pennsylvania does not, and the section after them explains how a claim actually gets filed, which is with the sheriff and on a five-business-day clock. None of this protects the company. Exemptions belong to individuals, and 42 Pa. C.S. §8123(b)(2) says so directly.

★ Our Top Pick
#1

Delancey Street

Attorney-Led MCA & Business Debt Settlement - $100M+ Resolved Nationwide

Important: Delancey Street is not a law firm. They are a business debt and MCA settlement company that works with a nationwide network of licensed attorneys, and those attorneys are the ones who negotiate with your funder, raise legal defenses in court when a case gets there, and close settlements at 30-60% of the outstanding balance. The distinction matters in practice, because when counsel from that network calls a funder, the funder is dealing with someone who can make the file expensive.

They have settled over $100M in business debt. The attorney network handles the whole sequence: stopping the daily ACH debits, challenging UCC liens, answering lawsuits, and drafting settlement agreements that carry full releases and UCC-3 terminations. Most single-position files resolve in 2 to 8 weeks. No upfront fees, and they work in all 50 states.

Best for: Business owners carrying one or more advances who want aggressive, attorney-led negotiation with no upfront cost
Total Settled: $100M+
Settlement Range: 30-60%
Attorney-Led: Yes
Upfront Fees: None
States Served: All 50
Talk to Delancey Street Today Free consultation. No upfront fees. Settlements at 30-60%. (888) 559-0156
Call Now
#2

National Debt Relief

Largest U.S. Debt Settlement Firm - A+ BBB Rating - 550,000+ Clients

Important: National Debt Relief is not a law firm, and they do not handle MCA-specific litigation, confession-of-judgment challenges, or UCC lien disputes. What they are is the largest debt settlement company in the United States, with an A+ Better Business Bureau rating and more than 550,000 clients served. Where they fit is the debt sitting alongside your advances: credit cards, vendor accounts, and lines of credit.

Best for: General unsecured business debt over $7,500 (not MCA-specific settlement)
Clients Served: 550,000+
Fee Structure: 18-25% of Enrolled Debt
MCA Settlement: No
BBB Rating: A+
The Daily Debits Do Not Stop On Their Own Delancey Street’s attorney network has settled over $100M in MCA and business debt. Free consultation, no upfront fees. Call before your funder escalates.
(888) 559-0156
#3

CuraDebt

25+ Years in Business Debt & Tax Resolution - IAPDA Certified

Important: CuraDebt is not a law firm and does not litigate MCA cases. They have spent 25 years on business debt and IRS and state tax resolution, which matters more than it sounds like it should, because a business that fell behind on advances has usually fallen behind on payroll taxes too, and forgiven debt can land as taxable income. They are IAPDA certified.

Best for: Combined business debt and tax resolution (not MCA-specific settlement)
Years in Business: 25+
Tax Resolution: Yes (IRS & State)
MCA Settlement: No

1. Three Hundred Dollars, and That Is the Whole Statutory Floor

42 Pa. C.S. §8123(a) is the general monetary exemption, and it protects property of the judgment debtor to the value of three hundred dollars from attachment or execution. The statute is deliberately broad about what qualifies, naming bank notes, money, securities, real property, judgments and other indebtedness due to you, so you can apply the three hundred dollars wherever it does the most good. Within the time set by general rules you may claim it in kind and designate specific items, unless the property you designate cannot be divided appropriately, or you may claim it in cash out of the proceeds of a sale.

The exceptions in §8123(b) matter more than the amount. Subsection (b)(2) removes the exemption entirely where the judgment debtor is not an individual, so a corporation or an LLC gets nothing at all. Subsection (b)(1) excludes support judgments, (b)(3) excludes judgments obtained for board of four weeks or less, (b)(4) excludes judgments of one hundred dollars or less for wages for manual labor, and (b)(5) excludes mortgage foreclosure judgments as to the mortgaged property, though it expressly preserves the exemption against a deficiency judgment.

The figure has not moved since the Act of December 20, 1982, and there is no indexing provision, so it will not move on its own. Pennsylvania is unusual in this respect: New York indexes its bank-account floor and its wage multiple, California indexes its homestead, Florida indexes nothing but starts from a constitutional protection with no ceiling. Here the statutory number is three hundred dollars and the meaningful protections sit outside the exemption chapter entirely. Anyone building a defense around §8123 is building on a very small foundation.

The Number Nobody Believes: 42 Pa. C.S. §8123(a): three hundred dollars, last amended in 1982, with no inflation adjustment anywhere in the section. §8123(b)(2) withholds it entirely from a debtor that is not an individual. Pa. R.C.P. 3111.1(3) does at least keep a bank writ off funds within that amount without a court order.

2. There Is No Pennsylvania Homestead Exemption

This deserves its own item because the absence is a planning fact, not a footnote. Search Chapter 81 of Title 42 and you will find exemptions for wearing apparel, bibles and school books, sewing machines, military uniforms, property on international exhibition and property in interstate transit in a common carrier’s hands. You will not find a residence. Pennsylvania never enacted a homestead exemption, and the three hundred dollars in §8123 is the only general dollar amount available in a state-court execution.

The consequence is direct. A guarantor sued on a Pennsylvania judgment who holds a house in their own name, alone, has essentially no state-law defense to a real property lien or to the eventual execution process, because 42 Pa. C.S. §4303(a) makes the judgment a lien on entry in the county where the property sits and Pa. R.C.P. 3023(c) runs it for five years subject to revival. Equity in the property is exposed at whatever level it exists.

Which is why the two answers on this page that do protect a residence are structural rather than statutory. The first is how the deed is held, covered in item four, because entireties ownership by a married couple where only one spouse is liable takes the property outside a creditor’s reach without any dollar figure attached. The second is bankruptcy, covered in item eight, where a Pennsylvania debtor may elect the federal exemption list and finally get a homestead number. Those are the two routes, and a guarantor with real equity in a solely owned house should be talking to counsel about both before a writ issues rather than after.

What Fills the Gap: Pennsylvania supplies no homestead exemption at all. The protection a guarantor actually gets comes from tenancy by the entireties in state court, and from 11 U.S.C. §522(d)(1) in a bankruptcy case, currently $31,575 per debtor. Both are covered below, and neither is automatic.

3. Wages the Employer Never Has to Hand Over

42 Pa. C.S. §8127(a) is the strongest single sentence in Pennsylvania debtor law: wages, salaries and commissions of individuals shall, while in the hands of the employer, be exempt from any attachment, execution or other process, except on an action or proceeding in a short and closed list of categories. Those categories are proceedings under 23 Pa. C.S. Part IV relating to divorce, actions for support, judgments for board of four weeks or less, certain residential-lease damages judgments in favor of a landlord, obligations under the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency Act, and restitution to crime victims along with costs, fines and bail judgments entered in a criminal proceeding.

A guarantee on a commercial advance appears nowhere on that list, and neither does an ordinary contract debt, a vendor account, a credit line or a deficiency. Compare that to the federal floor of twenty-five percent of disposable earnings that most states use, or to New York’s ten percent income execution, and the difference is stark. It is also the reason a funder holding a Pennsylvania guarantee judgment against a salaried person spends its effort on bank accounts and real property instead of the employer, and why settlement conversations here often start from a more realistic place.

Two limits are worth stating plainly so nobody over-relies on this. The exemption protects wages while the employer holds them; once the deposit lands in your bank account it is money in an account, and a writ served on the bank under Pa. R.C.P. 3111 attaches it subject only to the narrow carve-outs in Pa. R.C.P. 3111.1. And even the landlord exception that does allow attachment is capped by §8127(a)(3.1) at ten percent of net wages per pay period or the amount that would leave the debtor above the federal poverty guidelines, whichever is less. Section 8127(e) separately forbids an employer from taking any adverse action against an employee solely because wages were attached.

Wages Versus Deposits: 42 Pa. C.S. §8127(a) protects pay in the employer’s hands. It does not follow the money into your account, where Pa. R.C.P. 3111(b) attaches the balance and everything deposited after service. That transition is the single most exploited gap in Pennsylvania collection practice, and it happens on payday.

4. The Deed Held by Two Spouses, Only One of Whom Signed

This is the most valuable protection on the page and it deserves the most space. Pennsylvania recognizes tenancy by the entireties, a form of joint ownership available only to a married couple, in which neither spouse holds a divisible share. Because there is no severable interest for a sheriff to levy on or sell, a creditor holding a claim against only one spouse cannot execute against property held that way. The protection has no dollar ceiling, applies to the residence most guarantors are worried about, and does not depend on filing anything or claiming anything.

The legislature took the doctrine seriously enough to build it into the fraudulent transfer analysis. 12 Pa. C.S. §5101(b) defines “asset” to exclude an interest in property held in tenancy by the entireties to the extent it is not subject to process by a creditor holding a claim against only one tenant. That matters because it means such property is not merely difficult to reach, it is outside the category of things a voidable transfer claim under §5104 or §5105 can operate on at all. A creditor cannot use the voidable transactions chapter as a workaround.

Now the failure modes, because a funder’s counsel checks every one of them before writing off the asset. The protection ends if both spouses signed the guarantee, since the creditor then holds a claim against both tenants and the property is fully exposed. It ends on divorce, when the tenancy converts to a tenancy in common and each former spouse holds a reachable half. It ends on the death of the non-liable spouse, when the survivor takes the entire property subject to the judgment. And it never existed if the property was titled in one name alone, or if the couple was not married when title was taken. Retitling into entireties ownership after a claim has arisen is a different problem entirely, because that transfer is itself examinable under 12 Pa. C.S. §5104(b), whose factors include transfers made after the debtor had been sued or threatened with suit, and §5109 gives the creditor four years to bring it.

The practical point for a guarantee negotiation is that a funder that has run a title search and found entireties ownership with one signature knows its collection prospects against the residence are close to zero. That knowledge tends to show up in the settlement number long before anyone says so out loud.

One Signature or Two: The whole protection turns on whether your spouse signed. Pull the guarantee and check the signature block before you assume anything, because in a meaningful share of advance files the funder obtained a second signature as a spousal consent or a co-guarantee, and that single page converts a protected residence into an exposed one.

5. Retirement Accounts, and the Two Holes in the Protection

42 Pa. C.S. §8124(b)(1)(ix) exempts from attachment or execution any retirement or annuity fund provided for under sections 401(a), 403(a) and (b), 408, 408A, 409 or 530 of the Internal Revenue Code, along with the appreciation on it, the income from it, the benefits or annuity payable under it, and transfers and rollovers between such funds. In plain terms that covers a 401(k), a 403(b), a traditional IRA, a Roth IRA under 408A, and a Coverdell account under 530. There is no dollar ceiling in the subparagraph.

The exceptions are specific and they are where files go wrong. Clause (A) removes protection from amounts contributed within one year before the debtor filed for bankruptcy, expressly excluding direct rollovers from other protected funds from that clawback. Clause (B) removes protection from amounts contributed in excess of fifteen thousand dollars within any one-year period, again excluding direct rollovers. Clause (C) removes anything deemed a fraudulent conveyance. So the guarantor who sees a judgment coming and drops a large contribution into an IRA has created two problems rather than solving one.

Two neighboring subparagraphs pick up what clause (ix) misses. Subparagraph (vii) exempts any pension or annuity granted or paid by a private corporation or employer to a retired employee under a plan or contract providing that the benefit is not assignable, which is how many traditional defined-benefit pensions qualify. Subparagraph (viii) exempts a self-employed person’s retirement or annuity fund, but only to the extent of payments made while solvent and not exceeding the amount actually excluded or deducted for federal income tax purposes, together with appreciation and income. Public employees have their own provisions at §8124(b)(1)(i) through (vi), subject under (b)(2) to the Public Employee Pension Forfeiture Act.

The Fifteen Thousand Line: 42 Pa. C.S. §8124(b)(1)(ix)(B) strips the exemption from contributions above $15,000 in any one-year period, and clause (A) strips contributions made within a year before a bankruptcy filing. Direct rollovers are carved out of both. Timing a large contribution against a pending judgment is the pattern these clauses were written to catch.

6. Insurance and Annuity Value, Above and Below a Hundred a Month

42 Pa. C.S. §8124(c) is a longer list than most guarantors realize, and it contains one odd number worth understanding. Paragraph (3) exempts any policy or contract of insurance or annuity issued to a solvent insured who is the beneficiary of it, except any part exceeding an income or return of one hundred dollars per month. So the protection for a policy you own on yourself and for your own benefit is real but capped at a modest monthly stream, and value above that line is exposed. That figure, like the three hundred dollars in §8123, has not been indexed.

Several paragraphs are broader. Paragraph (4) exempts proceeds retained by the insurer at maturity or otherwise under an annuity or life policy where the policy or a supplemental agreement provides that the proceeds and income from them are not assignable, which is a drafting feature worth checking on any policy you hold. Paragraph (5) exempts any policy of group insurance or its proceeds outright. Paragraph (6) exempts the net amount payable under an annuity contract or life policy made for the benefit of, or assigned to, the insured’s spouse, children or dependent relative, with an express limit: it does not apply to the extent the judgment debtor is that spouse, child or relative.

Paragraph (7) exempts the net amount payable under any accident or disability insurance, which matters to an owner-operator whose income replacement coverage is the only thing keeping a household running during a collection fight. Paragraphs (1) and (8) cover fraternal benefit society payments, paragraph (2) covers workers’ compensation claims and payments, and paragraph (9) covers certain no-fault motor vehicle benefits. Read against the fact that Pennsylvania has no homestead exemption, the insurance list is one of the more substantial pieces of the state scheme, which says as much about the rest of the scheme as it does about the insurance.

Check the Anti-Assignment Language: 42 Pa. C.S. §8124(c)(4) turns on whether the policy or a supplemental agreement says the proceeds and their income are not assignable. That clause is a drafting choice, not a legal default. Pull the policy and look, because the same asset can be fully exempt or fully exposed depending on a sentence you have never read.

7. Benefits You Could Not Give Up If You Wanted To

Some protections are not exemptions you claim but restrictions on what any creditor may touch, and they hold regardless of how thin the rest of Pennsylvania’s list is. 42 U.S.C. §407(a) protects Social Security benefits from execution, levy, attachment and garnishment and forbids their transfer or assignment, which is why Social Security deposits are the paradigm case for the recurring electronic deposit carve-out in Pa. R.C.P. 3111.1. Workers’ compensation claims and payments are exempt under 42 Pa. C.S. §8124(c)(2), and unemployment compensation is reached through §8124(c)(10).

The official note to Pa. R.C.P. 3123.1 collects the rest, and it is a useful checklist to read before you conclude that an account is fully exposed. On the Pennsylvania side it lists the §8123 general exemption, the §8124(a) personal property items, the §8124(b) retirement provisions, the §8124(c) insurance provisions, the §8127 wage protection, §8125 for property on international exhibition, §8126 for goods in a common carrier’s hands in interstate transit, and several veterans’ compensation acts. On the federal side it lists Social Security, longshore and harbor workers’ compensation, civil service and foreign service retirement, railroad retirement, and Veterans Administration benefits under 38 U.S.C. §5301.

The item to be careful about is commingling. Exempt funds do not lose their character simply because they were deposited, but proving which dollars in a shared account came from an exempt source is a tracing exercise, and it is far easier when the exempt income lands in a dedicated account that receives nothing else. That is a housekeeping decision made months before any writ arrives, not something to fix after a bank has already frozen the balance.

Tracing Beats Arguing: Pa. R.C.P. 3111.1(1) keeps a bank writ off the first $10,000 of an account containing recurring electronic deposits identified as exempt on deposit, and 3111.1(2) protects a larger account where every deposit is of that character. Both conditions are about how the account is fed, which is why a single-purpose account is worth more than a good argument later.

8. Electing the Federal List, Which Is Where a Homestead Comes From

Pennsylvania has not opted out of the federal exemption scheme, so a Pennsylvania debtor in bankruptcy may elect the federal exemptions in 11 U.S.C. §522(d) instead of the state list. Given how thin the state list is, that election is usually the point of the analysis rather than a technicality. The federal amounts were adjusted effective April 1, 2025 by the Judicial Conference notice published at 90 Fed. Reg. 8941, and they hold until the next triennial adjustment on April 1, 2028.

The figures that matter to a guarantor are these. Section 522(d)(1) protects $31,575 of the debtor’s aggregate interest in real property used as a residence, which is the homestead Pennsylvania law does not supply. Section 522(d)(2) protects $5,025 in one motor vehicle. Section 522(d)(3) protects household goods and furnishings up to $800 per item and $16,850 in aggregate. Section 522(d)(5) is the wildcard, $1,675 plus up to $15,800 of any unused homestead amount, which is the provision that makes the election work for a renter or for someone with no equity. Section 522(d)(6) protects $3,175 in implements, professional books and tools of the trade, and §522(m) applies the exemptions separately to each debtor in a joint case, so a married couple filing together can claim them twice.

The election is all or nothing. You take the federal list or the state list, not the best pieces of each, so the arithmetic has to be run against your actual assets. A guarantor whose main asset is entireties real property may well be better off under state law, where the entireties protection has no ceiling and the federal homestead does. A guarantor with a solely owned house carrying modest equity, a vehicle and a retirement account is usually better off federal. That comparison is exactly the kind of thing to put in front of bankruptcy counsel before a petition is drafted, and well before a writ has already attached an account.

By the Numbers: 11 U.S.C. §522(d), as adjusted April 1, 2025 by the notice at 90 Fed. Reg. 8941: (d)(1) homestead $31,575; (d)(2) motor vehicle $5,025; (d)(3) household goods $800 per item and $16,850 aggregate; (d)(5) wildcard $1,675 plus up to $15,800 of unused homestead; (d)(6) tools of the trade $3,175. Next adjustment April 1, 2028.

The Claim You File With the Sheriff, Not the Court

An exemption in Pennsylvania is claimed, not applied automatically, and the mechanism catches people out because it does not run through the prothonotary. Pa. R.C.P. 3123.1(a) provides that a defendant may claim exemption or immunity of property from levy or attachment by filing a claim with the sheriff, substantially in the form provided by Pa. R.C.P. 3252(a), and may include a demand for a prompt hearing. The sheriff then immediately notifies the plaintiff and the garnishee that the claim has been filed.

The timing after that is fast. Under 3123.1(b) the sheriff must immediately present the matter to the court, and the court must hear the claim within five business days on whatever notice it directs, disposing of it promptly on testimony, admissions or other evidence. Under 3123.1(c) no judgment may be entered against a garnishee under Pa. R.C.P. 3146(b) until twenty days have run from service of the writ on that garnishee, and where an exemption claim is pending, judgment can be entered only by agreement or by leave of court. Those are the two windows a guarantor actually has, and both are measured in days.

One more distinction is worth keeping straight. Where the judgment was entered by confession rather than after a lawsuit, a separate and faster route exists under Pa. R.C.P. 2958.3, which is not an exemption claim at all but a challenge to whether you waived your due process rights knowingly, heard within three business days with the burden on the plaintiff. Both may be available on the same file. Neither happens unless somebody files the paper.

Five Business Days: Pa. R.C.P. 3123.1(b) requires the court to hear an exemption claim within five business days of the sheriff presenting it, and 3123.1(c) blocks a garnishee judgment for twenty days after service of the writ. Miss both windows and the argument is not lost on the merits, it is lost on the calendar.

None of This Reaches the Company

Every provision on this page belongs to an individual. 42 Pa. C.S. §8123(b)(2) makes the point in four words by excluding a debtor who is not an individual, and §8127(a) protects the wages of individuals specifically. A judgment against your operating entity reaches the bank account, the receivables, the equipment and any real property on the deed, with no exemption standing in the way and no claim form to file. That asymmetry is precisely why funders want both an entity obligor and a personal guarantee on every file.

It also explains the shape of most Pennsylvania collection campaigns. The entity judgment gets worked first because it is unobstructed, through a writ served on the bank under Pa. R.C.P. 3111 and on customers under Pa. R.C.P. 3108(a)(4). The guarantee judgment gets worked second, and against a guarantor whose pay is protected by §8127 and whose house is held by the entireties, that second campaign runs into walls quickly. Understanding which of the two judgments a creditor is actually executing on tells you which conversation you are in.

For the company side of the ledger, our page on what a Pennsylvania creditor can seize and what it cannot walks through the six tools in order, and our page on being sued personally on a guarantee covers how these two tracks usually run at the same time.

Two Judgments, Two Analyses: Check the caption before you check the exemption list. A judgment naming only the LLC does not touch anything on this page, and a judgment naming you personally does not touch the company’s equipment. Funders that hold both will run them in parallel, and the deadlines are separate.

Who Should You Call? Our Top-Rated Business Debt Firms

One firm on this list works the entire lifecycle of a business debt file, from stopping the daily debits through attorney-led negotiation, UCC lien removal, and a signed release. The other two cover broader debt categories that often sit alongside the advances. Choose accordingly.

★ Our Top Pick
#1

Delancey Street

Attorney-Led MCA & Business Debt Settlement - $100M+ Resolved Nationwide

The only firm here that handles the full arc of a business debt file: attorney-led negotiation, ACH revocation, legal defense, UCC lien removal, and a settlement agreement with a real release attached. Over $100M settled, no upfront fees, all 50 states, settlements at 30-60% of the balance.

Best for: Business owners carrying one or more advances who want aggressive, attorney-led negotiation with no upfront cost
Total Settled: $100M+
Settlement Range: 30-60%
Attorney-Led: Yes
Upfront Fees: None
Talk to Delancey Street Today Free consultation. No upfront fees. Settlements at 30-60%. (888) 559-0156
Call Now
#2

National Debt Relief

Largest U.S. Debt Settlement Firm - A+ BBB Rating - 550,000+ Clients

Not an MCA specialist. National Debt Relief does not negotiate advances, challenge confessions of judgment, or fight UCC liens. For the ordinary unsecured business debt sitting next to your advances, their scale and track record make them a reasonable option on that side of the ledger.

Best for: General unsecured business debt over $7,500 (not MCA-specific settlement)
Clients Served: 550,000+
MCA Settlement: No
Every Week You Wait, The File Gets More Expensive Stop the ACH debits, get the UCC lien addressed, and settle at 30-60%. Over $100M settled. Free consultation.
(888) 559-0156
#3

CuraDebt

25+ Years in Business Debt & Tax Resolution - IAPDA Certified

Not an MCA specialist either. CuraDebt handles business debt alongside IRS and state tax resolution, so if unpaid payroll taxes have stacked up behind the advances, they can work that front while the MCA side is negotiated.

Best for: Combined business debt and tax resolution (not MCA-specific settlement)
Tax Resolution: Yes (IRS & State)
MCA Settlement: No

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Pennsylvania have a homestead exemption?
No. Pennsylvania never enacted one, and the only general dollar amount in a state-court execution is the $300 in 42 Pa. C.S. §8123(a). A residence titled in one name alone is exposed to a judgment lien on entry under 42 Pa. C.S. §4303(a). The two ways a Pennsylvania guarantor ends up with homestead protection are tenancy by the entireties, where only one spouse is liable, and electing the federal exemptions in a bankruptcy case, where 11 U.S.C. §522(d)(1) currently protects $31,575.
Can a funder garnish my paycheck on a personal guarantee?
No. 42 Pa. C.S. §8127(a) exempts wages, salaries and commissions from attachment while the employer holds them, and the exception list runs to divorce and support matters, board for four weeks or less, certain residential-lease damages judgments, PHEAA obligations, and criminal restitution, fines, costs and bail. A commercial guarantee is not there. Once the pay is deposited it is an account balance, and a writ served on the bank under Pa. R.C.P. 3111(b) reaches it along with everything deposited afterward.
My wife did not sign the guarantee. Can they take our house?
If the property is held by the two of you as tenants by the entireties, a creditor with a claim against only one of you cannot execute against it, because neither spouse owns a severable share to sell. 12 Pa. C.S. §5101(b) reflects this by excluding such an interest from the statutory definition of an asset. Confirm the deed language rather than assuming, and confirm that the guarantee carries only one signature, because a spousal consent page changes the answer completely.
Is my IRA safe from a judgment in Pennsylvania?
Generally yes, with two carve-outs. 42 Pa. C.S. §8124(b)(1)(ix) exempts funds under Internal Revenue Code sections 401(a), 403(a) and (b), 408, 408A, 409 and 530, with no dollar cap, including appreciation, income and rollovers between such funds. Clause (A) excludes contributions made within one year before a bankruptcy filing and clause (B) excludes contributions above $15,000 in any one-year period, with direct rollovers carved out of both, and clause (C) excludes anything deemed a fraudulent conveyance.
How much does the general Pennsylvania exemption actually protect?
Three hundred dollars. 42 Pa. C.S. §8123(a) lets you apply it to money, bank notes, securities, real property or debts owed to you, in kind or in cash out of sale proceeds. It has not changed since 1982 and carries no indexing clause. Subsection (b)(2) makes it unavailable to a debtor that is not an individual, so your company gets nothing. Pa. R.C.P. 3111.1(3) at least keeps a bank writ off funds within that amount absent a court order.
How do I claim an exemption once property has been levied on?
File the claim with the sheriff, not the prothonotary. Pa. R.C.P. 3123.1(a) allows a defendant to claim exemption or immunity by filing with the sheriff in substantially the form of Pa. R.C.P. 3252(a), and to demand a prompt hearing. The sheriff notifies the plaintiff and the garnishee and presents the matter to the court immediately, and under 3123.1(b) the court must hear it within five business days. Under 3123.1(c) a garnishee judgment cannot be entered for twenty days after the writ was served.
Should I take the federal exemptions if I file bankruptcy?
Often, but not always, and the arithmetic decides. Pennsylvania has not opted out, so 11 U.S.C. §522(d) is available, and it supplies $31,575 of homestead protection, $5,025 for a vehicle, $16,850 aggregate for household goods, $3,175 in tools of the trade and a wildcard of $1,675 plus up to $15,800 of unused homestead, all as adjusted April 1, 2025. Where your main asset is entireties real property, state law may protect more, because that protection carries no ceiling. It is one election for the whole case.
Do these exemptions protect my business bank account?
No. Exemptions in Pennsylvania run to individuals, and 42 Pa. C.S. §8123(b)(2) removes even the $300 where the judgment debtor is not an individual. A judgment against the entity reaches the operating account through a writ served on the bank, and under Pa. R.C.P. 3111(b) that service attaches deposits arriving after service as well. The wage protection in §8127 and the entireties doctrine both operate on the personal side of the file only.

Find Out What They Can Actually Take From You

Send the judgment or the demand, the guarantee with its signature pages, the deed to any real property and a list of accounts and retirement holdings. You will get a plain answer on what §8127 and entireties ownership protect, whether a federal election makes sense, and what a realistic resolution looks like. Reviews cost nothing and we are compensated only when a balance is settled.

Call for a Free Consultation
Available Mon-Fri, 9 AM - 7 PM ET · No obligation · 100% confidential
Editorial Disclosure & Legal Disclaimer

This page is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. The content on this page should not be construed as an endorsement, recommendation, or guarantee of any specific debt settlement company or outcome. Individual results may vary based on the nature of the debt, creditor policies, and the specific circumstances of each case.

The rankings and evaluations presented reflect the independent editorial judgment of our review team based on publicly available information. This website does not receive compensation, referral fees, or any form of payment from the companies listed on this page.

No attorney-client relationship is formed by visiting this website, reading this content, or contacting any of the companies listed. Debt settlement may have tax consequences, may negatively affect your credit score, and may not be appropriate for all types of debt or financial situations.

Delancey Street is not a law firm. Delancey Street works with a nationwide network of attorneys and debt specialists who handle MCA defense, business debt settlement, and related services. Any attorney services referenced on this page are provided by independent, licensed attorneys within the Delancey Street network, not by Delancey Street directly.

Attorney Advertising. This page may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.

Delancey Street Free MCA & business debt consultation