Service & Results.

nyc criminal lawyers over 30 years of experienceWe Know How To Win Cases

Spodek Law Group handles tough cases
nationwide, that demand excellence.

Get Free Consultation

Faced 5+ Years in Prison

People Vs Joseph Amico

Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.

Faced 10+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Anna Sorokin

Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.

Faced 3+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Genevieve Sabourin

Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.

Faced Potential Charges

Ghislaine Maxwell Juror

Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.

Why Choose Us

Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.

Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.

We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.

Law in the Media

View All

Meet Todd Spodek


The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.

Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.

In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.

Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group

The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.

We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.

If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.

Not Guilty I Love Brooklyn Juries

Not Guilty I Love Brooklyn Juries

Brooklyn juries have undergone a major transformation in recent decades. The borough’s changing demographics, particularly the influx of educated, affluent professionals to neighborhoods like Williamsburg, has led to a phenomenon lawyers call the “Williamsburg Effect.” This article will examine how gentrification has changed the makeup and tendencies of Brooklyn juries, and the implications for defendants in criminal and civil cases.

The Changing Face of Brooklyn Juries

Not too long ago, Brooklyn juries were known for being heavily minority, working-class, and distrustful of police and authority figures. As Brooklyn native and veteran defense lawyer Julie Clark put it, “The jurors are becoming more like Manhattan — which is not good for defendants.”[1]

But gentrification has significantly altered the borough’s jury pool. From 2000 to 2012, the percentage of white people in Brooklyn grew from 41% to 50%, while rents spiked 77% over the same period.[2] The influx of affluent, educated professionals has made Brooklyn juries whiter, wealthier, and more likely to side with the prosecution.

High-profile defense lawyer Arthur Aidala explained, “When I was a prosecutor 22 years ago, a jury would be 80 percent people of color. Now, the grand juries have more law-and-order types in there.”[2]

Brooklyn Supreme Court judge Vincent Del Giudice agreed, saying “The juror pool is getting more cosmopolitan here in Brooklyn. There’s more of a blend across all socioeconomic strata. I see a lot more highly educated people. I see more college and post-graduate degrees.”[2]

This demographic shift is changing verdicts across Brooklyn’s courthouses. Defense lawyers report that the new jurors are more trusting of police and prosecutors and more likely to convict. Meanwhile, plaintiffs in civil cases are having a harder time winning big monetary awards from the more affluent, pro-business juries.

Implications for Criminal Cases

The gentrified jury pool is leading to more convictions in Brooklyn’s criminal courts.

Defense lawyer John Paul DeVerna explained, “The ‘Williamsburg Effect’ affects every case that goes to trial.” The educated “hipsters” who now fill the jury box are more likely to believe police testimony.[2]

DeVerna said a contrarian-minded juror from Williamsburg could potentially sway other jurors to acquit. But if that person gets along with everyone, their confidence and education can “hijack” the jury towards conviction.[2]

Prosecutors agree the new Brooklyn juries are more prosecution-friendly. For instance, white transplants from the Midwest or West are less likely to believe police would plant evidence or use excessive force.[2]

The shift is also impacting grand juries, which have historically leaned anti-police. Now, grand juries contain more law-and-order types, making them more prone to hand up indictments based on police testimony.[2]

High-profile acquittals were common in the past, often due to jury tampering or intimidation by mob bosses like John Gotti. But today’s juries are more trusting of police and prosecutors, leading to more convictions.[5]

Implications for Civil Cases

Not only are Brooklyn’s criminal juries getting tougher, but civil juries are becoming more conservative in awarding damages.

Plaintiff attorney Charen Kim explained, “We’re dealing with more sophisticated people, and they don’t believe [plaintiffs] should be awarded millions of dollars for nothing.”[2]

The pro-business, anti-litigation sentiment of the gentrified jurors has made it harder for plaintiffs to win big verdicts for injuries and other damages.

For example, plaintiff lawyer Edmond Chakmakian received a $6 million settlement for his client who was severely injured falling from scaffolding. But Chakmakian believes the “white-bread” Brooklyn jury would have only awarded $2 million if the case went to verdict. He settled because the jurors’ backgrounds made them skeptical of the large damages claim.[2]

The demographic change has also reduced anti-corporate bias. Today’s educated jurors are less inclined to punish deep-pocketed defendants simply because they have money.[2]

As a result, plaintiffs’ lawyers know they face an uphill battle convincing juries to deliver substantial punitive damages against corporations. The days of easily winning million-dollar verdicts are gone in gentrified Brooklyn.

How Judges and Lawyers Respond

Attorneys on both sides are adapting their trial strategies to the new Brooklyn jury pool.

Defense lawyers look for educated jurors who are likely to trust police and resist huge damages claims. Plaintiffs’ attorneys do the opposite, seeking out working-class minorities who may resent corporations.[2]

In some high-profile cases, judges have taken the rare step of fully sequestering anonymous juries to minimize outside influence. For instance, mob boss John Gotti’s 1992 federal trial used an anonymous, sequestered jury chosen from a wider geographic area.[5]

Judges also aim to make jury service less burdensome in lengthy trials. In the Gotti case, the judge allowed sequestered jurors conjugal visits with spouses to ease the months-long separation.[5]

Other judges permit jurors to keep their cell phones for coordinating personal affairs, though never for researching the case. Occasional home-baked treats from the judge can also boost juror morale during long trials.[5]

Ensuring juror wellbeing and minimizing stress is crucial, since even emotional reactions by courtroom spectators can impact the jury. For example, after an emotional day of testimony in Dylann Roof’s trial, Roof’s mother collapsed in court from a heart attack, which undoubtedly affected the jurors.[5]

The Future of Brooklyn Juries

The borough’s rapidly changing demographics ensure that Brooklyn juries will continue to “gentrify” in coming years. But there are steps that judges and policymakers can take to make juries more representative.

Expanding jury source lists beyond voter rolls could increase minority representation. Judges can also probe deeper during jury selection to uncover subtle racial biases.[4]

Simplifying convoluted jury instructions would also help; research shows many jurors don’t fully understand court instructions.[3] Trainings for jurors on key legal concepts could improve comprehension.[4]

Another proposal is greater use of “blue ribbon” juries containing experts on complex technical issues, like intellectual property or medical malpractice.[4] Though this raises concerns about elitism.

Reforming the jury system will be challenging. But with thoughtful policies we can work toward juries that better reflect Brooklyn’s diversity and fulfill their solemn role in our justice system. One thing is certain – Brooklyn juries will continue evolving alongside the borough itself.


[1] https://fastlawpc.com/not-guilty-i-love-brooklyn-juries/

[2] https://nypost.com/2014/06/16/brooklyn-gentrification-is-changing-juries-who-decide-cases/

[3] https://capitalpunishmentincontext.org/files/resources/juryinstruct/imp%20jury%20instructions.pdf

[4] https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1140&context=facultyworkingpapers

[5] https://www.uscourts.gov/news/2020/01/24/how-courts-care-jurors-high-profile-cases

[6] https://www.nytimes.com/1990/05/19/nyregion/2d-brooklyn-jury-rejects-murder-counts.html

Free Consultation


I was searching for a law firm with some power to help me deal with a warrant in New York . After 6 days I decided to go with Spodek Law Group. It helped that This law firm is well respected by not only the top law firms in New York , but the DA , Judge as well. I...

~Fonder Brandon

5 Stars
It was my good fortune to retain Spodek Law Group for representation for my legal needs. From the beginning, communication was prompt and thorough. Todd, Kenneth and Alex were the first people I worked with and they all made me feel comfortable and confident that the team was going to work hard for me. Everything was explained and any concerns...

~A G

5 Stars
After meeting with several law firms, I chose the Spodek Law Group not only for their professionalism and experience, but for the personal attention given to me right from the initial consultation. It is important to recognize how crucial having the right legal team is when faced with potentially life altering events that impact families and the lives of loved...

~George Cherubini

Spodek Law Group

White Glove Service

We Provide Superior Service, Excellent Results, At A Level Superior To Other Criminal Defense Law Firms. Regardless Of Where Your Case Is, Nationwide, We Can Help You.
View More

Request Free Consultation

Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.


85 Broad St 30th Floor, New York, NY 10004


get directions

Los Angeles

611 S Catalina St Suite 222, Los Angeles, CA 90005


get directions


35-37 36th St, 2nd Floor Astoria, NY 11106


get directions


195 Montague St., 14th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201


get directions
Call Now!