Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.
Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.
Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.
Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.
Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.
Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.
We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.
The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.
Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.
In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.
Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group
The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.
We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.
If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.
Last Updated on: 27th July 2023, 06:28 pm
In contentious New York divorce and child custody disputes, one spouse often looks to gain advantage by alleging drug or alcohol abuse by the other party. While judges can order drug testing, experienced counsel can challenge flawed demands to protect privacy rights. Before acquiescing to testing, understand your rights and options.
New York family and divorce courts look closely at parental fitness. A judge may allow drug testing requests if a party claims current use causes:
– Inability to care for children
– Domestic violence risk
– Child neglect or endangerment
– Arrests for possession
– Multiple DUI/DWIs
– Failed past probation/treatment
– Mental impairment from use
– Unknown sources of income
But inconclusive suspicions of use do not suffice. Credible evidence must demonstrate legitimate concerns.
rather than submitting to intrusive drug tests without justification, consult an attorney to challenge flawed requests through litigation if needed. Seek counsel experienced with:
– Family and divorce court procedures
– Disputing forensic evaluations
– Protecting privacy rights
– Motion practice and hearings
– Cross-examining witnesses
– Negotiating test parameters
– Parental rights and child welfare
Top attorneys vigorously defend against unnecessary drug testing infringing on parental rights. Don’t endure violations without a fight.
Understanding how demands for drug testing or evaluations arise allows coordination of the strongest response:
Filing Motion: One parent’s attorney files a motion detailing reasons to suspect substance issues, requesting testing.
Service: The court provides you with a copy of the motion to review. Be certain to meet any response deadlines indicated.
Collecting Evidence: Gather any documentation, treatments, test results contradicting allegations to include with your response.
Responding: Your lawyer files a rebuttal outlining evidence against testing and disputing its necessity.
Hearing: At court, your attorney argues vigorously against testing under questioning from the judge and opposing counsel.
Ruling: If the judge still orders testing, your attorney can pursue reconsideration while tightly controlling process.
Leveraging the right evidence and arguments from the outset often convinces judges drug testing is unwarranted, protecting your rights. Prepare thoroughly.
If unable to prevent court-ordered drug testing outright, skilled counsel employs strategies to strictly limit intrusiveness, such as:
Limit Testing Dates
Demand testing be allowed only on specific court-ordered dates to prevent constant, repeated demands.
Control Testing Methods
Stipulate testing facility qualifications and methodology to ensure reliability and limit false positives.
Allow Specific Drugs
Object to open-ended requests that could lead to probing for countless substances without particularized evidence.
Disallow Hair Testing
Dispute the validity of hair testing which reveals substances consumed weeks/months ago rather than current impairment.
Prevent Surprise Tests
Seek court orders requiring a precise testing notice period so you are not caught unprepared.
Request results be filed under seal rather than used publicly to protect privacy and limit potential stigma.
Even when some testing is permitted, Fightvigorously to constrain the terms to what is truly necessary and reasonable. Do not let rights be infringed.
Beyond direct burdens of testing, false substance abuse claims inflict lasting harm:
– Limited custody or visitation
– Child protective services inquiries
– Mental health evaluations
– Mandated therapy/treatment
– Reputational damage
– Reliance in future proceedings
– Legal expenses
Therefore, litigation must seek to prevent unsupported assertions from entering the record without overwhelming proof. Skillful counsel can mitigate the damage substantially.
When facing accusations, parents often make understandable but damaging mistakes. Experts suggest:
Don’t Delay Responding – Opposing counsel uses delay to claim you lack objections to testing. React urgently.
Don’t Admit Prior Use – Any description of past use not currently affecting parenting may still be manipulated against you.
Don’t Take Tests Voluntarily – Never take a test expecting it will clear you. Failed tests devastate cases.
Don’t Make Counterclaims – Seeking retaliatory drug testing of your spouse often backfires. Take the high road.
Don’t Testify About Treatment – Details of treatment for past use can still create doubts about parenting capacity. Keep private.
Let seasoned litigators guide your actions. Kneejerk responses only compound problems. Tread carefully.
If your spouse files for drug testing in a child custody dispute, smart legal moves include:
Review Motion Detailing Allegations – Closely assess what incidents and evidence specifically are claimed to justify testing requests.
Gather Contrary Evidence – Collect any documentation, treatment records, and third party accounts contradicting substance abuse claims through affidavits.
Hire an Experienced Attorney – Contact tested litigators in parental rights disputes immediately to preserve all objections.
Dispute Flawed Methodology – Challenge evaluator qualifications, methods, and bias to undermine necessity for testing orders.
Emphasize Constitutional Rights – Stress to the court how forced drug testing absent particularized evidence infringes on fundamental privacy and parental liberties.
With skilled counsel fully prepared to refute allegations, you can avoid ceding rights due to your spouse’s baseless conjecture. Protect yourself starting now.
Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.