Service & Results.

nyc criminal lawyers over 30 years of experienceWe Know How To Win Cases

Spodek Law Group handles tough cases
nationwide, that demand excellence.

Get Free Consultation

Faced 5+ Years in Prison

People Vs Joseph Amico

Covered by NYDaily News. Las Vegas man accused of threatening a prominent attorney and making vile remarks.

Faced 10+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Anna Sorokin

Covered by New York Times, and other outlets. Fake heiress accused of conning the city’s wealthy, and has an HBO special being made about her.

Faced 3+ Years in Prison

People Vs. Genevieve Sabourin

Accused of stalking Alec Baldwin. The case garnered nationwide attention, with USAToday, NYPost, and other media outlets following it closely.

Faced Potential Charges

Ghislaine Maxwell Juror

Juror who prompted calls for new Ghislaine Maxwell trial turns to lawyer who defended Anna Sorokin.

Why Choose Us

Clients can use our portal to track the status of their case, stay in touch with us, upload documents, and more.

Regardless of the type of situation you're facing, our attorneys are here to help you get quality representation.

We can setup consultations in person, over Zoom, or over the phone to help you. Bottom line, we're here to help you win your case.

Law in the Media

View All

Meet Todd Spodek


The Spodek Law Group understands how delicate high-profile cases can be, and has a strong track record of getting positive outcomes. Our lawyers service a clientele that is nationwide. With offices in both LA and NYC, and cases all across the country - Spodek Law Group is a top tier law firm.

Todd Spodek is a second generation attorney with immense experience. He has many years of experience handling 100’s of tough and hard to win trials. He’s been featured on major news outlets, such as New York Post, Newsweek, Fox 5 New York, South China Morning Post, Insider.com, and many others.

In 2022, Netflix released a series about one of Todd’s clients: Anna Delvey/Anna Sorokin.

Why Clients Choose Spodek Law Group

The reason is simple: clients want white glove service, and lawyers who can win. Every single client who works with the Spodek Law Group is aware that the attorney they hire could drastically change the outcome of their case. Hiring the Spodek Law Group means you’re taking your future seriously. Our lawyers handle cases nationwide, ranging from NYC to LA. Our philosophy is fair and simple: our nyc criminal lawyers only take on clients who we know will benefit from our services.

We’re selective about the clients we work with, and only take on cases we know align with our experience – and where we can make a difference. This is different from other law firms who are not invested in your success nor care about your outcome.

If you have a legal issue, call us for a consultation.
We are available 24/7, to help you with any – and all, challenges you face.

I’m Charged with a Federal Crime – What Factors Determine My Sentence?

By Spodek Law Group | October 19, 2023
(Last Updated On: October 20, 2023)

Last Updated on: 20th October 2023, 10:12 am


I’m Charged with a Federal Crime – What Factors Determine My Sentence?

Getting charged with a federal crime can be scary. The stakes are high, and the sentencing guidelines are complicated. As your case moves forward, one of your big questions will be “how much time am I really facing?”

While the final sentence depends on a lot of factors, there are some key things that judges consider when deciding federal punishments. Understanding these can help you know what to expect and prepare your legal strategy.

The Charges Against You

The charges filed by federal prosecutors are the starting point for determining your sentence. The type of crime, the specific statutes violated, and the severity of the charges impact the potential prison time.

For example, a federal wire fraud conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 carries a maximum sentence of 20 years. But a minor theft of government property under 18 U.S.C. § 641 may only be punishable by up to 1 year.

The number of charges and any sentencing enhancements will also matter. Prosecutors often stack multiple charges related to the same underlying crime, which exposes defendants to longer sentences.

Federal Sentencing Guidelines

While judges have discretion, most federal sentences are heavily influenced by the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. The guidelines provide detailed instructions for calculating a recommended range based on the crime, the defendant’s criminal history, and other factors.

This process considers things like:

  • The base offense level assigned to the crime
  • Increases and decreases to the offense level based on specific offense characteristics – things like the financial loss amount, use of weapons, etc.
  • Additional adjustments related to the victim, the defendant’s role in the crime, and other things
  • The defendant’s criminal history category based on any prior convictions

The final offense level and criminal history determine the recommended sentencing range per the guidelines’ sentencing table. While they are advisory, judges tend to stay within the guidelines.

Mandatory Minimum Sentences

Some federal statutes require judges to impose a mandatory minimum prison term if certain conditions are met. This legally binds the court to sentence defendants to a certain number of years.

For example, someone convicted of armed bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113 faces a mandatory minimum 7 years just for using a weapon. Other crimes like drug trafficking, child pornography, and illegal gun possession also carry mandatory minimums.

These limit judicial discretion and often result in harsher sentences. However, prosecutors can file motions to reduce mandatory minimums in some cases, allowing judges to go below the threshold.

Sentencing Memorandums

Before a federal sentencing hearing, both the prosecution and defense submit sentencing memorandums. These outline arguments about what they feel the appropriate sentence should be and why.

The defense memo will emphasize mitigating factors that support leniency. Things like a defendant’s poor upbringing, mental health issues, and lack of criminal history may be cited. The prosecution uses their memo to argue for harsher punishment.

Judges review these filings to help inform their decision. Unique personal circumstances described in the defense memorandum can sometimes lead to lower sentences.

Cooperation with the Government

One of the surest ways to reduce a federal sentence is cooperating with the prosecution. Defendants can provide substantial assistance by giving information or testifying for the government in other cases.

In exchange, prosecutors will file a 5K1.1 motion advising the judge to impose a lower sentence than the guidelines recommend. This is a powerful tool for securing a reduced punishment.

Plea Agreements

Many federal cases end in a plea deal where defendants agree to plead guilty in exchange for sentencing concessions by the government. This avoids trial and provides certainty of the outcome.

Plea agreements often bind the government to dismissing charges or recommending a lenient sentence. Judges have discretion to accept or reject the deal’s proposed sentence, but pleas nonetheless help secure better outcomes in most cases.

Sentencing Hearings

At the sentencing hearing itself, federal judges will consider arguments and evidence from both sides before imposing a final sentence. This gives defendants a chance to directly address the court and humanize themselves beyond just being a criminal on paper.

Judges look at how sincerely remorseful and willing to rehabilitate a defendant seems. Passionate advocacy from defense lawyers can also sway judges to be more lenient in borderline cases.

Federal Probation Office Recommendations

Federal probation officers play a key role in advising courts on sentencing. After a conviction, they conduct background investigations of defendants and recommend sentences to the judge.

Probation officers calculate guideline ranges and assess factors like a defendant’s role in the crime, criminal record, and family circumstances. Their recommendations carry significant weight, so having an officer advocate for leniency can help.

The Judge Assigned to Your Case

Each judge has their own philosophy, tendencies, and pet peeves when it comes to sentencing. Lawyers analyze a judge’s past rulings to gauge what they prioritize and how harsh they tend to be.

Some judges are known to be more sympathetic to certain arguments while others hand out tougher sentences. Understanding your judge can reveal opportunities to tailor your strategy.

Getting your case in front of a judge inclined to be more merciful can make a big difference. But you don’t have control over judge assignments, so this factor is about making the best of the hand you’re dealt.

Your Criminal History

A defendant’s criminal past is a key sentencing consideration. Those with minor records generally receive lower sentences than career criminals facing their latest conviction.

The guidelines use a point system to determine criminal history categories ranging from I to VI. More extensive records result in higher categories and stiffer recommended sentences.

Related factors like parole/probation status at the time of the offense, uncharged conduct, and gang affiliations also impact how judges view past crimes.

Public Safety Considerations

Federal law allows judges to factor public safety into sentences. Defendants viewed as an ongoing threat may get longer terms to protect the community.

However, empirical data shows age and criminal history are better predictors of recidivism than long sentences. Many experts argue excessive terms based on perceived dangerousness are unjustified and ineffective.

Sentencing Disparity

One sentencing goal is avoiding unwarranted disparities between defendants who commit similar crimes. Judges don’t want to impose much harsher sentences for the same offenses.

The guidelines were created to promote uniformity and proportionality. But critics argue they often have the opposite effect due to how the complex rules apply differently in each case.

Judges are allowed to deviate from the guidelines to avoid disparity, but this is uncommon. Sentencing similarities for comparable cases are closely scrutinized on appeal.

What You Can Do

While you don’t control every factor, there are things you can do to get the lowest sentence possible:

  • Avoid obstruction – don’t destroy evidence or make false statements.
  • Plead guilty and show sincere remorse where appropriate.
  • Highlight mitigating personal circumstances for the judge.
  • Obtain an experienced federal defense lawyer who can negotiate effectively.
  • Provide substantial assistance to the government if possible.

Federal sentencing is a high-stakes process with many complexities. But understanding how judges make decisions can help you develop an effective strategy. The best approach depends on the unique circumstances of your case.

Free Consultation


I was searching for a law firm with some power to help me deal with a warrant in New York . After 6 days I decided to go with Spodek Law Group. It helped that This law firm is well respected by not only the top law firms in New York , but the DA , Judge as well. I...

~Fonder Brandon

5 Stars
It was my good fortune to retain Spodek Law Group for representation for my legal needs. From the beginning, communication was prompt and thorough. Todd, Kenneth and Alex were the first people I worked with and they all made me, and my company Qumana skincare feel comfortable and confident that the team was going to work hard for me. Everything...

~A G

5 Stars
After meeting with several law firms, I chose the Spodek Law Group not only for their professionalism and experience, but for the personal attention given to me right from the initial consultation. It is important to recognize how crucial having the right legal team is when faced with potentially life altering events that impact families and the lives of loved...

~George Cherubini

Spodek Law Group

White Glove Service

We Provide Superior Service, Excellent Results, At A Level Superior To Other Criminal Defense Law Firms. Regardless Of Where Your Case Is, Nationwide, We Can Help You.
View More

Request Free Consultation

Please fill out the form below to receive a free consultation, we will respond to
your inquiry within 24-hours guaranteed.


85 Broad St 30th Floor, New York, NY 10004


get directions

Los Angeles

611 S Catalina St Suite 222, Los Angeles, CA 90005


get directions


35-37 36th St, 2nd Floor Astoria, NY 11106


get directions


195 Montague St., 14th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201


get directions
Call Now!